World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frans J. Th. Wackers

Frans J. Th. Wackers

Frans J. Th. Wackers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frans J. Th. Wackers between 1974 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frans J. Th. Wackers published across 49 years, from 1974 to 2022, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2004. 3 of the 173 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2004. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 8 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 3 publications
1974 2022

173 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frans J. Th. Wackers: publications per year, 1974 to 2022
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 1
1977 1
1978 1
1979 3
1980 8
1981 3
1982 2
1983 2
1984 2
1985 2
1986 1
1987 4
1988 3
1989 2
1990 5
1991 3
1992 1
1993 4
1994 3
1995 8
1996 11
1997 5
1998 6
1999 9
2000 5
2001 3
2002 5
2003 9
2004 14
2005 7
2006 4
2007 4
2008 8
2009 2
2010 4
2011 1
2012 1
2013 2
2014 1
2015 1
2016 1
2017 1
2018 1
2019 4
2020 1
2021 0
2022 3
Total 173
Download as CSV

Frans J. Th. Wackers publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans J. Th. Wackers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Frans J. Th. Wackers D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans J. Th. Wackers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Frans J. Th. Wackers is affiliated with Yale University in the United States and has contributed to research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work encompasses several subfields, including Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Political Science and International Relations, and Development.

The scientist has published multiple papers in notable venues, with a concentration in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. Recent publications include:

  • Heinz R. Schelbert, MD, PhD. (Born 1939), 2020, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
  • What happened to ASNC's founding members? The 2021 survey, 2022, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
  • Who were the Founding Members of ASNC?, 2022, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
  • In Memoriam Barry L. Zaret, MD 1940-2022, 2022, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Frequently, Wackers co-authors work with several researchers, including Ami E. Iskandrian, Jeffrey A. Leppo, and George Beller.

The main topics addressed in the scientist's research include Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy, Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes, Hospital Admissions and Outcomes, Global Political and Economic Relations, and International Development and Aid.

The frequent publication venue for their work is the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, which has hosted four of their papers to date.

Best Publications

  • Detection of silent myocardial ischemia in asymptomatic diabetic subjects: the DIAD study.

    Frans J Th Wackers;Lawrence H Young;Silvio E Inzucchi;Deborah A Chyun

  • Cardiac outcomes after screening for asymptomatic coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: the DIAD study: a randomized controlled trial.

    Lawrence H. Young;Frans J. Th. Wackers;Deborah A. Chyun;Janice A. Davey

  • Technetium-99m Hexakis 2-Methoxyisobutyl Isonitrile: Human Biodistribution, Dosimetry, Safety, and Preliminary Comparison to Thallium-201 for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

    F J Wackers;D S Berman;J Maddahi;D D Watson

  • Congestive heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction complicating doxorubicin therapy: Seven-year experience using serial radionuclide angiocardiography

    Ronald G. Schwartz;William B. McKenzie;Jonathan Alexander;Philip Sager

  • Multiple gated cardiac blood pool imaging for left ventricular ejection fraction: validation of the technique and assessment of variability.

    Frans J.Th. Wackers;Harvey J. Berger;David E. Johnstone;Lee Goldman

  • Use of the Initial Electrocardiogram to Predict In-Hospital Complications of Acute Myocardial Infarction

    J. E. Brush;D. A. Brand;D. Acampora;B. Chalmer

  • Feasibility of tomographic 99mTc-hexakis-2-methoxy-2-methylpropyl-isonitrile imaging for the assessment of myocardial area at risk and the effect of treatment in acute myocardial infarction.

    R. J. Gibbons;M. S. Verani;T. Behrenbeck;P. A. Pellikka

  • Value and limitations of thallium-201 scintigraphy in the acute phase of myocardial infarction

    Frans J. Th. Wackers;Ellinor Busemann Sokole;Gerard Samson;J. B. V. D. Schoot

  • Clinical Value of Acute Rest Technetium-99m Tetrofosmin Tomographic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Acute Chest Pain and Nondiagnostic Electrocardiograms

    Gary V Heller;Stephen A Stowers;Robert C Hendel;Steven D Herman

  • Comparison and reproducibility of visual echocardiographic and quantitative radionyclide left ventricular ejection fractions

    Niels van Royen;Carl C. Jaffe;Harlan M. Krumholz;Kevin M. Johnson

  • Failure to Improve Left Ventricular Function After Coronary Revascularization for Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Is Not Associated With Worse Outcome

    Habib Samady;John A. Elefteriades;Brian G. Abbott;Jennifer A. Mattera

  • Utility of cardiac biomarkers in predicting infarct size, left ventricular function, and clinical outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

    Stanley Chia;Fred Senatore;O. Christopher Raffel;Hang Lee

  • Comparison of immediate invasive, delayed invasive, and conservative strategies after tissue-type plasminogen activator. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Phase II-A trial.

    W J Rogers;D S Baim;J M Gore;B G Brown

  • Association of leukocyte and neutrophil counts with infarct size, left ventricular function and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

    Stanley Chia;John T. Nagurney;David F.M. Brown;O. Christopher Raffel

  • Prevalence of right ventricular involvement in inferior wall infarction assessed with myocardial imaging with thallium-201 and technetium-99m pyrophosphate

    Frans J. T.-H. Wackers;Frans J. T.-H. Wackers;K. I. Lie;K. I. Lie;Ellinor Busemann Sokole;Ellinor Busemann Sokole;Jan Res;Jan Res

  • Serial Quantitative Planar Technetium-99m Isonitrile Imaging in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Efficacy for Noninvasive Assessment of Thrombolytic Therapy

    Frans J.Th. Wackers;Raymond J. Gibbons;Mario S. Verani;David S. Kayden

  • Biokinetics of technetium-99m-tetrofosmin: myocardial perfusion imaging agent: implications for a one-day imaging protocol.

    Diwakar Jain;Frans J.Th. Wackers;Jennifer Mattera;Michael McMahon

  • Location and size of acute transmural myocardial infarction estimated from thallium-201 scintiscans. A clinicopathological study.

    F.J.T. Wackers;A.E. Becker;G. Samson;E.B. Sokole

  • Erratum: Detection of Ischemia in Asymptomatic Diabetics (DIAD) investigators: Detection of silent myocardial ischemia in asymptomatic diabetic subjects: The DIAD study (Diabetes Care (2004) 27 (1954-1961))

    F. J.Th Wackers;L. H. Young;S. E. Inzucchi;D. A. Chyun

  • Clinical validation of SPECT attenuation correction using x-ray computed tomography—derived attenuation maps: Multicenter clinical trial with angiographic correlation

    Yasmin Masood;Yi Hwa Liu;Gordon DePuey;Raymond Taillefer

Frequent Co-Authors

Barry L. Zaret
Barry L. Zaret Yale University
Silvio E. Inzucchi
Silvio E. Inzucchi Yale University
Kong I. Lie
Kong I. Lie University of Amsterdam
Alexander Gottschalk
Alexander Gottschalk Michigan State University
Daniel S. Berman
Daniel S. Berman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Eugene Braunwald
Eugene Braunwald Harvard Medical School
Jeroen J. Bax
Jeroen J. Bax Leiden University Medical Center
Hein J.J. Wellens
Hein J.J. Wellens Maastricht University
James E. Udelson
James E. Udelson Tufts Medical Center
Heinrich R. Schelbert
Heinrich R. Schelbert University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine can open doors to a wide array of rewarding opportunities beyond traditional medical school. For those interested in nursing, many individuals wonder, do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school? With the growing range of nursing schools that now waive standardized testing requirements, entering the field has become more flexible.

If you’re drawn to the administrative side of healthcare, a healthcare administration online degree provides a strong foundation in health leadership and policy. These flexible programs are ideal for those aspiring to manage healthcare facilities or lead teams.

Nurses looking to advance their roles can consider adn to np programs online, which bridge the gap between associate and master’s degrees, allowing for career growth as nurse practitioners.

Finally, a growing interest in wellness is driving demand for experts in diet and nutrition. With online degrees in nutrition, students can specialize in holistic care and public health, complementing many medical career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Frans J. Th. Wackers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles