World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 85 14645 558 433 25630

Kong I. Lie publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kong I. Lie between 1974 and 2012, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kong I. Lie published across 39 years, from 1974 to 2012, averaging 11.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 1995. 2 of the 434 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2012. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 1995. 1974: 6 publications 1975: 9 publications 1976: 10 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 13 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 14 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 11 publications 1989: 11 publications 1990: 15 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 38 publications 1994: 43 publications 1995: 56 publications 1996: 55 publications 1997: 29 publications 1998: 19 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 2 publications
1974 2012

434 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kong I. Lie: publications per year, 1974 to 2012
Year Publications
1974 6
1975 9
1976 10
1977 5
1978 13
1979 2
1980 5
1981 4
1982 4
1983 14
1984 6
1985 7
1986 6
1987 7
1988 11
1989 11
1990 15
1991 10
1992 16
1993 38
1994 43
1995 56
1996 55
1997 29
1998 19
1999 8
2000 6
2001 5
2002 3
2003 1
2004 3
2005 3
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 2
2010 0
2011 0
2012 2
Total 434
Download as CSV

Kong I. Lie publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kong I. Lie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 433 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 433
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Kong I. Lie D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kong I. Lie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 85
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kong I. Lie is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their academic profile reflects a focus on research conducted within this institution.

While no specific publications or co-authors are recorded, the affiliation with a major European research university situates Kong I. Lie within a context of active academic scholarship, likely contributing to the university's research output.

The absence of listed main fields or subfields of study, as well as main topics of work, suggests that detailed public data on their research focus or specialization is not available. This limits the ability to outline the thematic areas of their scientific inquiry.

Similarly, there are no records of recent papers, book publications, or frequent publication venues, which indicates that either such data is not publicly indexed or the scientist's research contributions might be in progress or unpublished in widely indexed sources.

There are no awards reported for Kong I. Lie, so no distinctions or honors can be attributed at this time.

As no indication is given of the scientist being deceased, all references remain in the present tense, reflecting an active or ongoing professional status.

Best Publications

  • Effects of Lipid Lowering by Pravastatin on Progression and Regression of Coronary Artery Disease in Symptomatic Men With Normal to Moderately Elevated Serum Cholesterol Levels The Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS)

    J. Wouter Jukema;Albert V.G. Bruschke;Ad J. van Boven;Johan H.C. Reiber

  • The role of a common variant of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein gene in the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. The Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study Group

    J. A. Kuivenhoven;J. W. Jukema;A. H. Zwinderman;P. De Knijff

  • Safety and efficacy of a novel calcium sensitizer, levosimendan, in patients with left ventricular failure due to an acute myocardial infarction. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study (RUSSLAN)

    V. S. Moiseyev;P. Põder;N. Andrejevs;M. Y. Ruda

  • The value of the electrocardiogram in the differential diagnosis of a tachycardia with a widened QRS complex

    Hein J.J. Wellens;Frits W.H.M. Bär;K.I. Lie

  • Prediction of uneventful cardioversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm from direct-current electrical cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation and flutter.

    Isabelle C. Van Gelder;Harry J. Crijns;Wiek H. Van Gilst;Remco Verwer

  • Lidocaine in the prevention of primary ventricular fibrillation. A double-blind, randomized study of 212 consecutive patients.

    Lie Ki;Wellens Hj;van Capelle Fj;Durrer D

  • Observations on mechanisms of ventricular tachycardia in man.

    Hein J. J. Wellens;Donald R. Düren;K. I. Lie

  • Value and limitations of thallium-201 scintigraphy in the acute phase of myocardial infarction

    Frans J. Th. Wackers;Ellinor Busemann Sokole;Gerard Samson;J. B. V. D. Schoot

  • Early treatment of unstable angina in the coronary care unit: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled comparison of recurrent ischaemia in patients treated with nifedipine or metoprolol or both

    F. L. Meijler;A. C. Arntzenuis;A. J. Dunning;P. G. Hugenholtz

  • THE VALUE OF CLASS-IC ANTIARRHYTHMIC DRUGS FOR ACUTE CONVERSION OF PAROXYSMAL ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION OR FLUTTER TO SINUS RHYTHM

    Maarten J. Suttorp;J.Herre Kingma;Emile R. Jessurun;Loraine Lie-A-Huen

  • Randomised study of effect of ibopamine on survival in patients with advanced severe heart failure

    J R Hampton;D J van Veldhuisen;F X Kleber;A J Cowley

  • B-Mode Ultrasound Assessment of Pravastatin Treatment Effect on Carotid and Femoral Artery Walls and Its Correlations With Coronary Arteriographic Findings: A Report of the Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS)

    Eric de Groot;J.Wouter Jukema;Alexander D. Montauban van Swijndregt;Aeilko H. Zwinderman

  • Time Course of Hemodynamic Changes and Improvement of Exercise Tolerance After Cardioversion of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Unassociated With Cardiac Valve Disease

    I.C. van Gelder;H.J.G.M. Crijns;P.K. Blanksma;M.L.J. Landsman

  • Chronic atrial fibrillation - Success of serial cardioversion therapy and safety of oral anticoagulation

    I.C. van Gelder;H.J.G.M. Crijns;R.G. Tieleman;J. Brugemann

  • Spinal cord stimulation in chronic intractable angina pectoris: a randomized, controlled efficacy study.

    R. W. M. Hautvast;M. J. L. Dejongste;M. J. Staal;W. H. Van Gilst

  • Aspirin versus coumadin in the prevention of reocclusion and recurrent ischemia after successful thrombolysis: a prospective placebo-controlled angiographic study. Results of the APRICOT Study.

    A. Meijer;F. W. A. Verheugt;C. J. P. J. Werter;K. I. Lie

  • Comparison between New York Heart Association classification and peak oxygen consumption in the assessment of functional status and prognosis in patients with mild to moderate chronic congestive heart failure secondary to either ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

    Stan A.J. van den Broek;Dirk J. van Veldhuisen;Pieter A. de Graeff;Martin L.J. Landsman

  • Prognostic value of heart rate variability during long-term follow-up in patients with mild to moderate heart failure

    Jan Brouwer;Dirk J. van Veldhuisen;Arie J. Man In 't Veld;Jaap Haaksma

  • Further observations on ventricular tachycardia as studied by electrical stimulation of the heart. Chronic recurrent ventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia during acute myocardial infarction.

    Hein J. J. Wellens;K. I. Lie;Dirk Durrer

  • Observations on patients with primary ventricular fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction.

    K I Lie;H J Wellens;E Downar;D Durrer

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans L. Hillege
Hans L. Hillege University Medical Center Groningen
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen University Medical Center Groningen
Hein J.J. Wellens
Hein J.J. Wellens Maastricht University
Wiek H. van Gilst
Wiek H. van Gilst University Medical Center Groningen
J. Wouter Jukema
J. Wouter Jukema Leiden University Medical Center
Frans J. Th. Wackers
Frans J. Th. Wackers Yale University
Jan J. Piek
Jan J. Piek University of Amsterdam
Jan G.P. Tijssen
Jan G.P. Tijssen University of Amsterdam
Johan H. C. Reiber
Johan H. C. Reiber Leiden University Medical Center
Isabelle C. Van Gelder
Isabelle C. Van Gelder University Medical Center Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Medicine but seeking alternative or supplementary career paths, a range of flexible online programs can help you achieve your goals. Many healthcare professionals are enhancing their qualifications by enrolling in a 1 year dnp program online to quickly advance their nursing careers and access leadership roles.

For those focused on pharmaceutical sciences, pursuing a pharmacy school online accredited program provides the flexibility to balance studies with work—while ensuring the credentials are respected by employers and licensing bodies.

Interested in health technology and patient data? A him associate degree online opens doors to varied roles in medical records management, compliance, and healthcare IT.

Finally, medical support roles such as billing and coding are in high demand. Completing medical billing and coding online courses is a practical step toward a fast-growing healthcare career with the flexibility of remote work options.

Best Scientists Citing Kong I. Lie

Recently Published Articles