World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
34788
World Ranking
10812
National Ranking
428

Johan H. C. Reiber publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johan H. C. Reiber sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 690 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Johan H. C. Reiber D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johan H. C. Reiber sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Johan H. C. Reiber is affiliated with Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the field of medicine, with a particular focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and biomedical engineering.

Their scholarly contributions largely concentrate on several key topics within cardiovascular research. These include:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research

Johan H. C. Reiber has published extensively in certain academic venues, showing a pattern of frequent contributions to:

  • The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
  • International Journal of Cardiac Imaging
  • EuroIntervention
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • European Heart Journal

Recent publications authored by or involving Johan H. C. Reiber include:

  • Association Between Changes in Perivascular Adipose Tissue Density and Plaque Progression, 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Attenuation in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Versus Stable Coronary Artery Disease, 2023, Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
  • The SYNTAX Score on Its Way Out or... Towards Artificial Intelligence: Part I, 2020, EuroIntervention
  • The SYNTAX Score on Its Way Out or... Towards Artificial Intelligence: Part II, 2020, EuroIntervention
  • The Aging Imageomics Study: Rationale, Design and Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population, 2020, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development

Collaborations are an important facet of their research output. Frequent co-authors associated with Johan H. C. Reiber include:

  • Patrick W. Serruys
  • Yoshinobu Onuma
  • Christos V. Bourantas
  • Pieter Kitslaar
  • Ryo Torii

Best Publications

  • A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction.

    F. Zijlstra;M. J. De Boer;J. C. A. Hoorntje;S. Reiffers

  • Incidence of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: a time-related phenomenon. A quantitative angiographic study in 342 consecutive patients at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months.

    P. W. Serruys;H. E. Luijten;K. J. Beatt;R. Geuskens

  • Effects of Lipid Lowering by Pravastatin on Progression and Regression of Coronary Artery Disease in Symptomatic Men With Normal to Moderately Elevated Serum Cholesterol Levels The Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS)

    J. Wouter Jukema;Albert V.G. Bruschke;Ad J. van Boven;Johan H.C. Reiber

  • Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms.

    J H Reiber;P W Serruys;C J Kooijman;W Wijns

  • Diet, lipoproteins, and the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. The Leiden Intervention Trial.

    Arntzenius Ac;Kromhout D;Barth Jd;Reiber Jh

  • Infarct tissue heterogeneity assessed with contrast-enhanced MRI predicts spontaneous ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

    Stijntje Dorien Roes;C. Jan Willem Borleffs;Rob J. van der Geest;Jos J.M. Westenberg

  • A Randomized Clinical Trial of α1-Antitrypsin Augmentation Therapy

    Asger Dirksen;Joop H. Dijkman;Flemming Madsen;Berend Stoel

  • A new cluster validity index for the fuzzy c-mean

    M. Ramze Rezaee;B. B.F. Lelieveldt;J. H.C. Reiber

  • 3-D active appearance models: segmentation of cardiac MR and ultrasound images

    S.C. Mitchell;J.G. Bosch;B.P.F. Lelieveldt;R.J. van der Geest

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography : The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study

    Shengxian Tu;Jelmer Westra;Junqing Yang;Clemens von Birgelen

  • Multistage hybrid active appearance model matching: segmentation of left and right ventricles in cardiac MR images

    S.C. Mitchell;B.P.F. Lelieveldt;R.J. van der Geest;H.G. Bosch

  • Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries.

    Shengxian Tu;Emanuele Barbato;Zsolt Köszegi;Junqing Yang

  • Automatic segmentation of echocardiographic sequences by active appearance motion models

    J.G. Bosch;S.C. Mitchell;B.P.F. Lelieveldt;F. Nijland

  • LDL-Apheresis Atherosclerosis Regression Study (LAARS) Effect of Aggressive Versus Conventional Lipid Lowering Treatment on Coronary Atherosclerosis

    A.A. Kroon;W.R.M. Aengevaeren;T. van der Werf;G.J.H. Uijen

  • Comparison of echocardiographic methods with magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of right ventricular function in children.

    Willem A. Helbing;Hans G. Bosch;Chris Maliepaard;Sidney A. Rebergen

  • Evaluation of plaque characteristics in acute coronary syndromes: non-invasive assessment with multi-slice computed tomography and invasive evaluation with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis

    Gabija Pundziute;Joanne D Schuijf;J Wouter Jukema;Isabel Decramer

  • Coronary Artery Dimensions from Cineangiograms-Methodology and Validation of a Computer-Assisted Analysis Procedure

    Johan H. C. Reiber;Cornelis J. Kooijman;Cornelis J. Slager;Jan J. Gerbrands

  • Fully automatic segmentation of white matter hyperintensities in MR images of the elderly

    F. Admiraal-Behloul;D.M.J. van den Heuvel;H. Olofsen;M.J.P. van Osch

  • Head-to-head comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and electroanatomical voltage mapping to assess post-infarct scar characteristics in patients with ventricular tachycardias: real-time image integration and reversed registration

    Adrianus P Wijnmaalen;Rob J van der Geest;Carine F B van Huls van Taxis;Hans-Marc J Siebelink

  • Comparison between manual and semiautomated analysis of left ventricular volume parameters from short-axis MR images.

    van der Geest Rj;Buller Vg;Jansen E;Lamb Hj

Frequent Co-Authors

Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt
Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt Leiden University Medical Center
Rob J. van der Geest
Rob J. van der Geest Leiden University Medical Center
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Albert de Roos
Albert de Roos Leiden University Medical Center
Jeroen J. Bax
Jeroen J. Bax Leiden University Medical Center
J. Wouter Jukema
J. Wouter Jukema Leiden University Medical Center
William Wijns
William Wijns University of Galway
Milan Sonka
Milan Sonka University of Iowa
Hildo J. Lamb
Hildo J. Lamb Leiden University Medical Center
Martin J. Schalij
Martin J. Schalij Leiden University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring your options beyond traditional medical school is essential for those seeking flexibility or accelerated entry into healthcare careers. Online programs offer a variety of pathways designed for students with different goals and schedules. For nurses aiming to advance their education quickly, a 1 year dnp program online can propel your expertise to the highest clinical level in less time.

If you’re looking for a faster way to start working in patient care, a 9 month lpn program provides an accelerated path to become a Licensed Practical Nurse. Meanwhile, those interested in mental health can consider specialized options like online pmhnp programs, which are designed for working professionals aiming to become Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioners.

Not all healthcare roles require direct patient care. If you’re interested in the business side of healthcare, earning an affordable healthcare administration degree online can open doors to leadership and administrative positions in hospitals, clinics, and other organizations. Each pathway presents unique rewards and challenges, allowing you to tailor your education to your career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Johan H. C. Reiber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles