World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
22191
World Ranking
15748
National Ranking
7925

Barry L. Zaret publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barry L. Zaret sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 385 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Barry L. Zaret D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barry L. Zaret sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Barry L. Zaret is affiliated with Yale University in the United States. Their recent research contributions are documented in a publication from 2021 in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

Their known published paper is:

  • "Avijit (Tultul) Lahiri (1948-2021): A friend, mentor and inspiration to all!" (2021), Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Zaret has collaborated with the following frequent co-authors:

  • Jeffrey A. Leppo
  • Prem Soman

The primary publication venue for Zaret's work is the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

Zaret has been recognized as a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Comparative Effects of Therapy With Captopril and Digoxin in Patients With Mild to Moderate Heart Failure

    Jay Cohn;Morton Hawkins;Herbert Levine;John Naughton

  • Intact systolic left ventricular function in clinical congestive heart failure.

    Robert Soufer;Daniel Wohlgelernter;Nestor A. Vita;Marcos Amuchestegui

  • Serial Assessment of Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity with Quantitative Radionuclide Angiocardiography

    J Alexander;N Dainiak;H J Berger;L Goldman

  • Congestive heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction complicating doxorubicin therapy: Seven-year experience using serial radionuclide angiocardiography

    Ronald G. Schwartz;William B. McKenzie;Jonathan Alexander;Philip Sager

  • The effect of intravenous thrombolytic therapy on left ventricular function: a report on tissue-type plasminogen activator and streptokinase from the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI Phase I) trial.

    F H Sheehan;E Braunwald;P Canner;H T Dodge

  • Coronary artery bypass grafting in severe left ventricular dysfunction: Excellent survival with improved ejection fraction and functional state

    John A. Elefteriades;George Tolis;Evelyn Levi;L.Kendrick Mills

  • Multiple gated cardiac blood pool imaging for left ventricular ejection fraction: validation of the technique and assessment of variability.

    Frans J.Th. Wackers;Harvey J. Berger;David E. Johnstone;Lee Goldman

  • Assessment of cardiac performance with quantitative radionuclide angiocardiography: Right ventricular ejection fraction with reference to findings in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Harvey J. Berger;Richard A. Matthay;Jacob Loke;Robert C. Marshall

  • Noninvasive regional myocardial perfusion with radioactive potassium. Study of patients at rest, with exercise and during angina pectoris.

    Zaret Bl;Strauss Hw;Martin Nd;Wells Hp

  • Noninvasive imaging of myocardial angiogenesis following experimental myocardial infarction

    David F. Meoli;Mehran M. Sadeghi;Svetlana Krassilnikova;Brian N. Bourke

  • Functional left ventricular aneurysm formation after acute anterior transmural myocardial infarction: incidence, natural history and prognostic implications

    Jay L. Meizlish;Harvey J. Berger;Michael Plankey;Diane Errico

  • Global and regional left ventricular response to bicycle exercise in coronary artery disease: Assessment by quantitative radionuclide angiocardiography

    Harvey J. Berger;Lawrence A. Reduto;David E. Johnstone;Henry Borkowski

  • Myocardial imaging with thallium-201: A multicenter study in patients with angina pectoris or acute myocardial infarction

    James L. Ritchie;Barry L. Zaret;H.William Strauss;Bertram Pitt

  • Comparison of immediate invasive, delayed invasive, and conservative strategies after tissue-type plasminogen activator. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Phase II-A trial.

    W J Rogers;D S Baim;J M Gore;B G Brown

  • Assessment of cardiac performance with quantitative radionuclide angiocardiography: sequential left ventricular ejection fraction, normalized left ventricular ejection rate, and regional wall motion.

    R C Marshall;H J Berger;J C Costin;G S Freedman

  • Physiologic correlates of right ventricular ejection fraction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A combined radionuclide and hemodynamic study☆

    Bruce N. Brent;Harvey J. Berger;Richard A. Matthay;Donald Mahler

  • A noninvasive scintiphotographic method for detecting regional ventricular dysfunction in man.

    Zaret Bl;Strauss Hw;Hurley Pj;Natarajan Tk

  • Sequential radionuclide assessment of left and right ventricular performance after acute transmural myocardial infarction.

    Lawrence A. Reduto;Harvey J. Berger;Lawrence S. Cohen;Alexander Gottschalk

  • Role of behavioral and psychological factors in mental stress-induced silent left ventricular dysfunction in coronary artery disease☆

    Matthew M. Burg;Diwakar Jain;Robert Soufer;Robert Soufer;Robert D. Kerns;Robert D. Kerns

  • Serial Quantitative Planar Technetium-99m Isonitrile Imaging in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Efficacy for Noninvasive Assessment of Thrombolytic Therapy

    Frans J.Th. Wackers;Raymond J. Gibbons;Mario S. Verani;David S. Kayden

Frequent Co-Authors

Frans J. Th. Wackers
Frans J. Th. Wackers Yale University
Alexander Gottschalk
Alexander Gottschalk Michigan State University
Matthew M. Burg
Matthew M. Burg Yale University
Eugene Braunwald
Eugene Braunwald Harvard Medical School
George A. Beller
George A. Beller University of Virginia
Jeffrey R. Bender
Jeffrey R. Bender Yale University
Hillel Laks
Hillel Laks University of California, Los Angeles
H. William Strauss
H. William Strauss Cornell University
Bertram Pitt
Bertram Pitt University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open new career doors for those interested in healthcare, even beyond traditional medical studies. Accelerated options such as the accelerated healthcare administration degree are ideal for students who want to quickly move into management roles within hospitals, clinics, or private practices.

For nurses who want to advance their clinical expertise, asn to nurse practitioner programs provide a flexible path from an associate’s degree to a master’s degree in nursing. These bridge programs are designed for working professionals seeking higher credentials without pausing their careers.

Nutrition is another vital health discipline with promising online study options. The best online nutrition programs deliver foundational knowledge in dietetics, wellness, and preventative care—the perfect complement to various medical careers.

Finally, those focused on healthcare leadership can pursue cahme-accredited online mha programs, which offer a strong academic and professional foundation for future healthcare administrators.

Best Scientists Citing Barry L. Zaret

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles