World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
22632
World Ranking
17149
National Ranking
8593

Hillel Laks publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hillel Laks sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 547 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Hillel Laks D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hillel Laks sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hillel Laks is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research spans key areas in medicine and engineering, with a focus on surgery, biomedical engineering, and epidemiology. Their work also addresses specialized topics within transplantation methods and outcomes, mechanical circulatory support devices, congenital heart disease studies, and cardiac structural anomalies and repair.

The scientist's publication record includes contributions to diverse venues, notably Current Transplantation Reports and Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. Among recent publications are:

  • Orthotopic Heart and Combined Heart Liver Transplantation: the Ultimate Treatment Option for Failing Fontan Physiology, 2021, Current Transplantation Reports
  • A Novel Method of Chest Wall Reconstruction Succeeding Pediatric Heart Transplantation Donor-recipient Size Mismatch: 25-year Follow-up, 2025, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open

Frequent collaborators in their research include Leigh Reardon, Jeannette P. Lin, Glen S. VanArsdell, Fady M. Kaldas, and Gentian Lluri. These coauthors have contributed to various aspects of transplantation and surgical methods in multiple published works.

Hillel Laks' main fields of study encompass:

  • Medicine
  • Engineering

Their subfields of study entail:

  • Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Epidemiology

The main topics of their scholarly activity can be found in:

  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair

Best Publications

  • Effect of pravastatin on outcomes after cardiac transplantation.

    J A Kobashigawa;S Katznelson;H Laks;J A Johnson

  • Monocyte transmigration induced by modification of low density lipoprotein in cocultures of human aortic wall cells is due to induction of monocyte chemotactic protein 1 synthesis and is abolished by high density lipoprotein

    M Navab;S S Imes;S Y Hama;G P Hough

  • Structural abnormalities of great arterial walls in congenital heart disease: light and electron microscopic analyses.

    Koichiro Niwa;Joseph K. Perloff;Sunita M. Bhuta;Hillel Laks

  • Value of metabolic imaging with positron emission tomography for evaluating prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction

    Marcelo F. Di Carli;Michael Davidson;Roderick Little;Sandeep Khanna

  • Quantitative Relation Between Myocardial Viability and Improvement in Heart Failure Symptoms After Revascularization in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

    M. F. Di Carli;Farbod Asgarzadie;H. R. Schelbert;R. C. Brunken

  • Atrial extracellular matrix remodeling and the maintenance of atrial fibrillation.

    Jun Xu;Guanggen Cui;Fardad Esmailian;Mark Plunkett

  • A controlled trial of exercise rehabilitation after heart transplantation.

    Jon A. Kobashigawa;David A. Leaf;Nancy Lee;Michael P. Gleeson

  • Impact of left ventricular cavity size on survival in advanced heart failure

    Thomas H. Lee;Michele A. Hamilton;Lynne W. Stevenson;Jaime D. Moriguchi

  • Ten-year follow-up of a randomized trial of pravastatin in heart transplant patients.

    Jon A. Kobashigawa;Jaime D. Moriguchi;Hillel Laks;Liane Wener

  • Improvement in exercise capacity of candidates awaiting heart transplantation

    Lynne Warner Stevenson;Anthony E Steimle;Gregg Fonarow;Michael Kermani

  • Initial experience with the AbioCor implantable replacement heart system.

    Robert D Dowling;Laman A Gray;Steven W Etoch;Hillel Laks

  • Girdling effect of nonstimulated cardiomyoplasty on left ventricular function

    Eli R. Capouya;Richard S. Gerber;Davis C. Drinkwater;Jeffrey M. Pearl

  • Warm induction of cardioplegia with glutamate-enriched blood in coronary patients with cardiogenic shock who are dependent on inotropic drugs and intra-aortic balloon support.

    Eliot R. Rosenkranz;Gerald D. Buckberg;Hillel Laks;Donald G. Mulder

  • Benefits of Early Surgical Repair in Fixed Subaortic Stenosis

    Ron Brauner;Hillel Laks;Davis C. Drinkwater;Oleg Shvarts

  • Partial Fontan: advantages of an adjustable interatrial communication.

    Hillel Laks;Jeffrey M. Pearl;Gary S. Haas;Davis C. Drinkwater

  • Monocyte migration into the subendothelial space of a coculture of adult human aortic endothelial and smooth muscle cells.

    Mahamad Navab;Gregory P. Hough;Lynne W. Stevenson;Davis C. Drinkwater

  • Ventilatory and diffusion abnormalities in potential heart transplant recipients.

    Robert S. Wright;Michael S. Levine;Paul E. Bellamy;Michael S. Simmons

  • Prevention of reperfusion injury in the neonatal heart with leukocyte-depleted blood.

    M. A. Breda;D. C. Drinkwater;H. Laks;S. Bhuta

  • Pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect in adults.

    A J Marelli;J K Perloff;J S Child;H Laks

  • A prospective, randomized, crossover pilot study of inhaled nitric oxide versus inhaled prostacyclin in heart transplant and lung transplant recipients

    Tanveer A. Khan;Gabriel Schnickel;David Ross;Sam Bastani

Frequent Co-Authors

Jon A. Kobashigawa
Jon A. Kobashigawa Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Michael C. Fishbein
Michael C. Fishbein University of California, Los Angeles
Gregg C. Fonarow
Gregg C. Fonarow University of California, Los Angeles
Lynne W. Stevenson
Lynne W. Stevenson Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Judith A. Berliner
Judith A. Berliner University of California, Los Angeles
Gerald D. Buckberg
Gerald D. Buckberg University of California, Los Angeles
Thomas A. Drake
Thomas A. Drake University of California, Los Angeles
Benjamin Bonavida
Benjamin Bonavida University of California, Los Angeles
Alan M. Fogelman
Alan M. Fogelman University of California, Los Angeles
Kalyanam Shivkumar
Kalyanam Shivkumar University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine can open diverse pathways beyond becoming a practicing physician. Online degrees now provide accessible options for students eager to enter or advance within the rapidly growing healthcare field.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, an online health management degree offers foundational skills in administration, policy, and patient care coordination. Advancing further, you may consider the cheapest master's in healthcare administration to gain deeper expertise for mid-to-senior level roles in hospitals and clinics.

Nursing professionals seeking the highest level of clinical practice can look at the cheapest bsn to dnp programs available online, allowing RNs to become Doctor of Nursing Practice graduates with leadership and advanced practice skills. Those passionate about pharmaceuticals might pursue online pharmacy programs, preparing graduates for licensure as pharmacists or roles in research and industry.

Exploring these alternative degrees is a smart way to enter or progress in medicine, especially if you seek flexible learning and a wide range of healthcare career options.

Best Scientists Citing Hillel Laks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles