World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
5739
World Ranking
8568
National Ranking
3645

Mario Dzemidzic publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario Dzemidzic sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 124 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mario Dzemidzic D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario Dzemidzic sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mario Dzemidzic is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States, focusing on research within the broad fields of Neuroscience and Medicine. Their work primarily engages with various subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The scientist's research topics cover multiple areas with the highest number of publications related to Functional Brain Connectivity Studies. Other significant themes in their body of work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Mental Health Research Topics, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, and the influence of Neurotransmitter Receptors on behavior.

Frequent publication venues for their studies include the Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, Proceedings of IMPRS, NeuroImage, and Schizophrenia Research. These journals reflect a focus on the intersection of neuroscience, psychiatric conditions, and neuroimaging methodology.

The following papers illustrate key aspects of their recent research contributions:

  • Assessing pulsatile waveforms of paravascular cerebrospinal fluid dynamics within the glymphatic pathways using dynamic diffusion-weighted imaging (dDWI), 2022, NeuroImage
  • Optimizing differential identifiability improves connectome predictive modeling of cognitive deficits from functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease, 2021, Human Brain Mapping
  • The disengaging brain: Dynamic transitions from cognitive engagement and alcoholism risk, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Tangent functional connectomes uncover more unique phenotypic traits, 2023, iScience
  • Keeping the inner voice inside the head, a pilot fMRI study, 2021, Brain and Behavior

Collaboration forms a notable element of their research profile. Frequent co-authors include David A. Kareken, Jaroslaw Harezlak, Karmen K. Yoder, Yu-Chien Wu, and Evgeny J. Chumin, each having contributed to multiple joint publications with Dzemidzic.

Best Publications

  • Resting state corticolimbic connectivity abnormalities in unmedicated bipolar disorder and unipolar depression

    Amit Anand;Yu Li;Yang Wang;Mark J. Lowe

  • Correlations in low-frequency BOLD fluctuations reflect cortico-cortical connections.

    Mark J. Lowe;Mario Dzemidzic;Joseph T. Lurito;Vincent P. Mathews

  • Hemispheric roles in the perception of speech prosody.

    Jackson T. Gandour;Yunxia Tong;Donald Wong;Thomas M. Talavage

  • Multiple sclerosis: low-frequency temporal blood oxygen level-dependent fluctuations indicate reduced functional connectivity initial results.

    Mark J. Lowe;Micheal D. Phillips;Joseph T. Lurito;David Mattson

  • Temporal integration of speech prosody is shaped by language experience: an fMRI study.

    Jack Gandour;Mario Dzemidzic;Donald Wong;Mark Lowe

  • Temporal lobe activation demonstrates sex-based differences during passive listening.

    Micheal D. Phillips;Mark J. Lowe;Joseph T. Lurito;Mario Dzemidzic

  • A Cross-Linguistic fMRI Study of Spectral and Temporal Cues Underlying Phonological Processing

    Jack Gandour;Donald Wong;Mark Lowe;Mario Dzemidzic

  • Food‐Related Odor Probes of Brain Reward Circuits During Hunger: A Pilot fMRI Study

    Veronique Bragulat;Mario Dzemidzic;Carolina Bruno;Cari A. Cox

  • Alcohol-related olfactory cues activate the nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area in high-risk drinkers: preliminary findings.

    David A. Kareken;Eric D. Claus;Merav Sabri;Mario Dzemidzic

  • Mapping the functional connectome traits of levels of consciousness

    Enrico Amico;Enrico Amico;Daniele Marinazzo;Carol Di Perri;Lizette Heine

  • Functional anatomy of human odor sensation, discrimination, and identification in health and aging.

    David A. Kareken;Diane M. Mosnik;Richard L. Doty;Mario Dzemidzic

  • Striatal dopamine transporter availability in unmedicated bipolar disorder.

    Amit Anand;Gavriel Barkay;Mario Dzemidzic;Daniel Albrecht

  • A cross‐linguistic fMRI study of perception of intonation and emotion in Chinese

    Jack Gandour;Donald Wong;Mario Dzemidzic;Mark Lowe

  • Decreased GABA levels in anterior cingulate cortex/medial prefrontal cortex in panic disorder

    Zaiyang Long;Carla Medlock;Mario Dzemidzic;Yong Wook Shin

  • Activation of the left planum temporale in pitch processing is shaped by language experience.

    Yisheng Xu;Jackson Gandour;Thomas Talavage;Donald Wong

  • Negative Urgency and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Responses to Alcohol Cues: fMRI Evidence of Emotion‐Based Impulsivity

    Melissa A. Cyders;Mario Dzemidzic;William J. Eiler;Ayca Coskunpinar

  • Neurochemical abnormalities in unmedicated bipolar depression and mania: A 2D 1H MRS investigation

    Jun Xu;Ulrike Dydak;Ulrike Dydak;Jaroslaw Harezlak;Jonathan Nixon

  • Beer flavor provokes striatal dopamine release in male drinkers: mediation by family history of alcoholism.

    Brandon G Oberlin;Mario Dzemidzic;Stella M Tran;Christina M Soeurt

  • Family history of alcoholism mediates the frontal response to alcoholic drink odors and alcohol in at-risk drinkers

    David A. Kareken;Veronique Bragulat;Mario Dzemidzic;Cari Cox

  • Neural correlates of segmental and tonal information in speech perception

    Jack Gandour;Yisheng Xu;Donald Wong;Mario Dzemidzic

Frequent Co-Authors

S. E. Vigdor
S. E. Vigdor Indiana University
Andrew J. Saykin
Andrew J. Saykin Indiana University
Liana G. Apostolova
Liana G. Apostolova Indiana University
Jack Gandour
Jack Gandour Purdue University West Lafayette
Sean O'Connor
Sean O'Connor Indiana University
Olaf Sporns
Olaf Sporns Indiana University
Melissa A. Cyders
Melissa A. Cyders Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Robert V. Considine
Robert V. Considine Indiana University
Shannon L. Risacher
Shannon L. Risacher Indiana University
Jackson T. Gandour
Jackson T. Gandour Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Neuroscience and the wide range of associated careers, exploring online education can open up flexible pathways. Numerous online certifications offer practical skills or specialization in related areas, helping you stay competitive in the evolving job market.

If you are searching for accessible entry points, a variety of easy bachelor degrees online might provide a foundation before advancing toward neuroscience or allied health programs. Such options can be ideal for those balancing other commitments or looking to build confidence in a university setting.

The expanding need for mental health professionals also connects neuroscience with fields like social work and applied behavior analysis. Some of the most affordable online msw programs prepare graduates for clinical and counseling roles, while bcba online masters programs focus on applied behavioral analysis, a specialization valued in schools, clinics, and research settings.

Together, these flexible options create pathways for students with diverse goals, backgrounds, and resources to participate in neuroscience-related careers and research.

Best Scientists Citing Mario Dzemidzic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles