World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7188 3893 112 9174

Scott F. Coffey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott F. Coffey between 1997 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott F. Coffey published across 24 years, from 1997 to 2020, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2013. 4 of the 112 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2013. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications
1997 2020

112 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott F. Coffey: publications per year, 1997 to 2020
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 2
2001 0
2002 4
2003 5
2004 3
2005 2
2006 7
2007 4
2008 6
2009 4
2010 5
2011 7
2012 9
2013 12
2014 7
2015 12
2016 4
2017 6
2018 5
2019 2
2020 2
Total 112
Download as CSV

Scott F. Coffey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott F. Coffey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 112 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 112
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott F. Coffey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott F. Coffey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott F. Coffey was affiliated with the University of Mississippi Medical Center in the United States. Their research contributions focused primarily on fields related to health professions and medicine.

The main fields of study for Coffey included:

  • Health Professions
  • Medicine

Within these areas, their subfields of study covered:

  • General Health Professions
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health

The primary research topics addressed by Coffey encompassed:

  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment

Coffey published work appearing in the venue:

  • Training and Education in Professional Psychology

Among the recent papers authored, the following is notable:

  • Practice and dissemination of motivational interviewing: A psychology internship curriculum, 2020, Training and Education in Professional Psychology

Frequent collaborators included:

  • Julie A. Schumacher
  • Daniel C. Williams
  • Michael B. Madson
  • Nicholas W. McAfee

Scott F. Coffey is deceased. Their body of work contributes to the academic discussion around health professions, mental health, and the implementation of clinical practices within health policy frameworks.

Best Publications

  • Examination of a short English version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale ☆

    Melissa A. Cyders;Andrew K. Littlefield;Scott Coffey;Kenny A. Karyadi

  • Impulsivity and rapid discounting of delayed hypothetical rewards in cocaine-dependent individuals.

    Scott F. Coffey;Gregory D. Gudleski;Michael E. Saladin;Kathleen T. Brady

  • The Impact of Event Scale –Revised: Psychometric properties in a sample of motor vehicle accident survivors

    J. Gayle Beck;DeMond M. Grant;Jennifer P. Read;Joshua D. Clapp

  • Substance Abuse and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

    Kathleen T. Brady;Sudie E. Back;Scott F. Coffey

  • Financial and social circumstances and the incidence and course of PTSD in Mississippi during the first two years after Hurricane Katrina.

    Sandro Galea;Melissa Tracy;Fran Norris;Scott F. Coffey

  • Trauma and substance cue reactivity in individuals with comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and cocaine or alcohol dependence.

    Scott F Coffey;Michael E Saladin;David J Drobes;Kathleen T Brady

  • Psychometric Properties of the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI): a replication with motor vehicle accident survivors.

    J. Gayle Beck;Scott F. Coffey;Sarah A. Palyo;Berglind Gudmundsdottir

  • Intimate partner violence and Hurricane Katrina: predictors and associated mental health outcomes.

    Julie A. Schumacher;Scott F. Coffey;Fran H. Norris;Melissa Tracy

  • Cocaine dependence with and without post-traumatic stress disorder: a comparison of substance use, trauma history and psychiatric comorbidity.

    Sudie Back;Bonnie S. Dansky;Scott F. Coffey;Michael E. Saladin

  • Screening for PTSD in motor vehicle accident survivors using the PSS-SR and IES

    Scott F. Coffey;Berglind Gudmundsdottir;J. Gayle Beck;Sarah A. Palyo

  • Psychometric properties of the IES-R in traumatized substance dependent individuals with and without PTSD

    Carla J. Rash;Scott F. Coffey;Joseph S. Baschnagel;David J. Drobes

  • Screening for PTSD in a substance abuse sample: Psychometric properties of a modified version of the PTSD symptom scale self-report

    Scott F. Coffey;Bonnie S. Dansky;Sherry A. Falsetti;Michael E. Saladin

  • Trauma-focused imaginal exposure for individuals with comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and alcohol dependence: Revealing mechanisms of alcohol craving in a cue reactivity paradigm.

    Scott F. Coffey;Paul R. Stasiewicz;Pamela M. Hughes;Marcella L. Brimo

  • The relationship of alexithymia to emotional dysregulation within an alcohol dependent treatment sample.

    Paul R. Stasiewicz;Clara M. Bradizza;Gregory D. Gudleski;Scott F. Coffey

  • PTSD symptom severity as a predictor of cue-elicited drug craving in victims of violent crime.

    Michael E Saladin;David J Drobes;Scott F Coffey;Bonnie S Dansky

  • The use of divalproex in alcohol relapse prevention: a pilot study.

    Kathleen T Brady;Hugh Myrick;Hugh Myrick;Scott Henderson;Scott F Coffey

  • Social Support Moderates Effects of Natural Disaster Exposure on Depression and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: Effects for Displaced and Nondisplaced Residents

    Adam P. McGuire;Adam P. McGuire;Jami M. Gauthier;Jami M. Gauthier;Lisa M. Anderson;Lisa M. Anderson;Lisa M. Anderson;David W. Hollingsworth;David W. Hollingsworth;David W. Hollingsworth

  • Group cognitive behavior therapy for chronic posttraumatic stress disorder: an initial randomized pilot study.

    J. Gayle Beck;Scott F. Coffey;David W. Foy;Terence M. Keane

  • Internet-based intervention for mental health and substance use problems in disaster-affected populations: a pilot feasibility study.

    Kenneth J. Ruggiero;Heidi S. Resnick;Ron Acierno;Scott F. Coffey

  • Acute and protracted cocaine abstinence in an outpatient population: a prospective study of mood, sleep and withdrawal symptoms.

    Scott F Coffey;Bonnie S Dansky;Maureen H Carrigan;Kathleen T Brady

  • Sleep disturbance and emotion dysregulation as transdiagnostic processes in a comorbid sample.

    Christopher P. Fairholme;Elizabeth L. Nosen;Elizabeth L. Nosen;Yael I. Nillni;Yael I. Nillni;Yael I. Nillni;Julie A. Schumacher

Frequent Co-Authors

Kathleen T. Brady
Kathleen T. Brady Medical University of South Carolina
Michael E. Saladin
Michael E. Saladin Medical University of South Carolina
Sandro Galea
Sandro Galea Washington University in St. Louis
Bonnie S. Dansky
Bonnie S. Dansky Medical University of South Carolina
David J. Drobes
David J. Drobes University of South Florida
J. Gayle Beck
J. Gayle Beck University of Memphis
Natalie Mota
Natalie Mota University of Manitoba
Matthew T. Tull
Matthew T. Tull University of Toledo
Jennifer P. Read
Jennifer P. Read University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Dean G. Kilpatrick
Dean G. Kilpatrick Medical University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens the door to a variety of online degrees and career pathways, particularly in counseling, mental health, and therapy roles. With the growing demand for mental health professionals in the USA, it’s important to consider both the quality and affordability of programs that fit your career ambitions.

Many accredited universities now offer flexible, online counseling degrees for students seeking career advancement or a new role in behavioral health. If you’re budget-conscious, it’s worth exploring the affordable counseling programs in Colorado or the cheapest counseling programs in Connecticut. For those located in the Midwest, consider researching the cheapest counseling programs in Des Moines.

Additionally, the southeastern region offers some of the most affordable counseling degree programs in Florida, making it easier for students to balance education and cost. Whatever your location, comparing these programs can help you find the right balance between tuition, flexibility, and career outcomes within the expanding field of psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Scott F. Coffey

Recently Published Articles