World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9587 8968 660 620 118 4758

Natalie Mota publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Natalie Mota between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Natalie Mota published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2021. 17 of the 143 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2021. 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 10 publications
2008 2025

143 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Natalie Mota: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 2
2009 1
2010 4
2011 5
2012 4
2013 4
2014 2
2015 11
2016 16
2017 6
2018 12
2019 9
2020 9
2021 18
2022 12
2023 11
2024 7
2025 10
Total 143
Download as CSV

Natalie Mota publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie Mota sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 118
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Natalie Mota D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie Mota sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Natalie Mota is affiliated with the University of Manitoba in Canada. Their research spans psychology and medicine, with a strong focus on clinical psychology as well as health professions and public health. The primary fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine

The subfields of study they contribute to are:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • General Health Professions
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Mota's work addresses several main research topics, including:

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Resilience and Mental Health

Frequent publication venues where Mota's work appears include:

  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • Frontiers in Health Services
  • General Hospital Psychiatry
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Coauthor collaborations feature prominently in their scholarly output. Frequent coauthors are:

  • Renée El-Gabalawy
  • Jitender Sareen
  • Jordana L. Sommer
  • Tracie O. Afifi
  • Murray W. Enns

Examples of recent published papers by Natalie Mota include:

  • "The National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study: A Narrative Review and Future Directions," 2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • "Cannabis use and social anxiety in young adulthood: A meta-analysis," 2022, Addictive Behaviors
  • "The 5-Year Incidence of Mental Disorders in a Population-Based ICU Survivor Cohort," 2020, Critical Care Medicine
  • "Addressing co-occurring suicidal thoughts and behaviors and posttraumatic stress disorder in evidence-based psychotherapies for adults: A systematic review," 2021, Journal of Traumatic Stress
  • "Course and Predictors of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the Canadian Armed Forces: A Nationally Representative, 16-Year Follow-up Study," 2021, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Self-medication with alcohol or drugs for mood and anxiety disorders: A narrative review of the epidemiological literature

    Sarah Turner;Natalie Mota;James Bolton;Jitender Sareen

  • Physical Punishment and Mental Disorders: Results From a Nationally Representative US Sample

    Tracie O. Afifi;Natalie P. Mota;Patricia Dasiewicz;Harriet L. MacMillan

  • The burden of alcohol use disorders in US military veterans: results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study.

    Brian S. Fuehrlein;Natalie Mota;Albert J. Arias;Louis A. Trevisan

  • Functional significance of a novel 7-factor model of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms: results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans study.

    Robert H. Pietrzak;Robert H. Pietrzak;Jack Tsai;Jack Tsai;Cherie Armour;Natalie Mota

  • Harsh physical punishment in childhood and adult physical health.

    Tracie O. Afifi;Natalie Mota;Harriet L. MacMillan;Jitender Sareen

  • Relationship between adverse childhood experiences and homelessness and the impact of axis I and II disorders.

    Leslie E. Roos;Natalie Mota;Tracie O. Afifi;Laurence Y. Katz

  • Perceived Need for Care, Help Seeking, and Perceived Barriers to Care for Alcohol Use Disorders in a National Sample

    B.A. Janine Oleski;Natalie Mota;Brian J. Cox;F.R.C.P.C. Jitender Sareen

  • The relationships between harsh physical punishment and child maltreatment in childhood and intimate partner violence in adulthood.

    Tracie O. Afifi;Natalie Mota;Jitender Sareen;Harriet L. MacMillan

  • Military sexual trauma in US veterans: results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study

    Katherine Klingensmith;Jack Tsai;Natalie Mota;Steven M. Southwick

  • LONGITUDINAL COURSE OF POSTTRAUMATIC GROWTH AMONG U.S. MILITARY VETERANS: RESULTS FROM THE NATIONAL HEALTH AND RESILIENCE IN VETERANS STUDY

    Jack Tsai;Jack Tsai;Lauren M. Sippel;Lauren M. Sippel;Natalie Mota;Natalie Mota;Steven M. Southwick;Steven M. Southwick

  • Psychological resilience in U.S. military veterans: A 2-year, nationally representative prospective cohort study

    Kayla Isaacs;Natalie P. Mota;Jack Tsai;Jack Tsai;Ilan Harpaz-Rotem;Ilan Harpaz-Rotem

  • Risk, coping and PTSD symptom trajectories in World Trade Center responders

    Adriana Feder;Natalie Mota;Ryan Salim;Janice Rodriguez

  • The association between adult attachment style, mental disorders, and suicidality: findings from a population-based study.

    Daniel Palitsky;Natalie Mota;Tracie O. Afifi;A. Craig Downs

  • Stress and mental disorders in female military personnel: Comparisons between the sexes in a male dominated profession

    Natalie P. Mota;Maria Medved;JianLi Wang;Gordon J.G. Asmundson

  • FKBP5 polymorphisms, childhood abuse, and PTSD symptoms: Results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study

    Laura E. Watkins;Laura E. Watkins;Shizhong Han;Ilan Harpaz-Rotem;Ilan Harpaz-Rotem;Natalie P. Mota

  • Purpose in Life is Associated with a Reduced Risk of Incident Physical Disability in Aging U.S. Military Veterans

    Natalie P. Mota;Jack Tsai;Jack Tsai;Paul D. Kirwin;Paul D. Kirwin;Jitender Sareen;Jitender Sareen

  • Associations between Abortion, Mental Disorders, and Suicidal Behaviour in a Nationally Representative Sample:

    Natalie P Mota;Margaret Burnett;Jitender Sareen

  • Nature and determinants of suicidal ideation among U.S. veterans: Results from the national health and resilience in veterans study.

    Noelle B. Smith;Noelle B. Smith;Natalie Mota;Natalie Mota;Jack Tsai;Lindsey Monteith

  • The relationship between mental disorders, quality of life, and pregnancy: findings from a nationally representative sample.

    Natalie Mota;Brian J. Cox;Murray W. Enns;Laura Calhoun

  • Protective factors for mental disorders and psychological distress in female, compared with male, service members in a representative sample.

    Natalie P Mota;Maria Medved;Debbie Whitney;Diane Hiebert-Murphy

  • Age Differences in the Association of Social Support and Mental Health in Male U.S. Veterans: Results From the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study.

    Melissa R. Weiner;Joan K. Monin;Natalie Mota;Robert H. Pietrzak;Robert H. Pietrzak

Frequent Co-Authors

Jitender Sareen
Jitender Sareen University of Manitoba
Robert H. Pietrzak
Robert H. Pietrzak Yale University
Steven M. Southwick
Steven M. Southwick Yale University
Renée El-Gabalawy
Renée El-Gabalawy University of Manitoba
Tracie O. Afifi
Tracie O. Afifi University of Manitoba
Jack Tsai
Jack Tsai The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Ilan Harpaz-Rotem
Ilan Harpaz-Rotem Yale University
John H. Krystal
John H. Krystal Yale University
Murray W. Enns
Murray W. Enns University of Manitoba
Gordon J.G. Asmundson
Gordon J.G. Asmundson University of Regina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens multiple career pathways, especially for those interested in becoming licensed therapists across the USA. Online degrees offer flexibility, but it’s essential to understand the varied educational and licensing requirements in different regions.

For example, those looking into licensed therapist requirements in New York City must complete a master’s-level program and accrue thousands of supervised hours. Similarly, if you’re considering becoming a licensed therapist in Newark, you’ll need to fulfill specific coursework and pass state licensing exams.

In other locations, like Virginia, the Norfolk licensed therapist education requirements include both formal education and monitored clinical experience. Meanwhile, aspiring professionals exploring the North Las Vegas licensed therapist education requirements should be prepared for rigorous training and exam processes.

When choosing an online psychology degree, be sure to research your preferred state’s licensing process in advance. This ensures your coursework aligns with local requirements, paving a clear path to a successful counseling or therapy career.

Best Scientists Citing Natalie Mota

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles