World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
17324
World Ranking
3491
National Ranking
1967

Mark S. Goldman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Goldman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 159 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark S. Goldman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Goldman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark S. Goldman is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Neuroscience with significant work also contributed to Engineering.

The scientist's subfields of study include:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Molecular Biology
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Main topics of their research cover:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms

The scientist has published extensively, with works appearing frequently in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Cell Reports, Nature Neuroscience, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Current Biology.

Recent papers include:

  • "Choice-selective sequences dominate in cortical relative to thalamic inputs to NAc to support reinforcement learning," 2022, Cell Reports
  • "Predicting modular functions and neural coding of behavior from a synaptic wiring diagram," 2024, Nature Neuroscience
  • "Cyclic structure with cellular precision in a vertebrate sensorimotor neural circuit," 2023, Current Biology
  • "Oculomotor plant and neural dynamics suggest gaze control requires integration on distributed timescales," 2022, The Journal of Physiology
  • "Interactions between circuit architecture and plasticity in a closed-loop cerebellar system," 2024, eLife

Collaborations are a significant part of their work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Emre Aksay
  • Brandon J. Bhasin
  • Jennifer L Raymond
  • Celia David
  • Amy Sterling

Best Publications

  • Expectations of Reinforcement from Alcohol: Their Domain and Relation to Drinking Patterns.

    Sandra A. Brown;Mark S. Goldman;Andres Inn;Lynn R. Anderson

  • The Alcohol Expectancy Questionnaire: an instrument for the assessment of adolescent and adult alcohol expectancies.

    Sandra A. Brown;Bruce A. Christiansen;Mark S. Goldman

  • Using alcohol expectancies to predict adolescent drinking behavior after one year.

    Bruce A. Christiansen;Gregory T. Smith;Patricia V. Roehling;Mark S. Goldman

  • Expectancy challenge and drinking reduction : experimental evidence for a mediational process

    Jack Darkes;Mark S. Goldman

  • Development of alcohol-related expectancies in adolescents: separating pharmacological from social-learning influences.

    Bruce A. Christiansen;Mark S. Goldman;Andres Inn

  • Expectancy theory - Thinking about Drinking

    Mark S Goldman;S. A. Brown;B. A. Christiansen

  • Up close and personal: temporal variability in the drinking of individual college students during their first year.

    Frances K. Del Boca;Jack Darkes;Paul E. Greenbaum;Mark S. Goldman

  • Expectancy for social facilitation from drinking: The divergent paths of high-expectancy and low-expectancy adolescents.

    Gregory T. Smith;Mark S. Goldman;Paul E. Greenbaum;Bruce A. Christiansen

  • Alcohol expectancy theory: The application of cognitive neuroscience

    Mark S Goldman;Frances K. Del Boca;Jack Darkes

  • Alcoholism and memory: broadening the scope of alcohol-expectancy research.

    Mark S. Goldman;Sandra A. Brown;Bruce A. Christiansen;Gregory T. Smith

  • Do alcohol expectancies mediate drinking patterns of adults

    Sandra A. Brown;Mark S. Goldman;Bruce A. Christiansen

  • Alcohol-Related Expectancies versus Demographic/Background Variables in the Prediction of Adolescent Drinking.

    Bruce A. Christiansen;Mark S. Goldman

  • Emergence of alcohol expectancies in childhood: a possible critical period.

    P. G. Miller;G. T. Smith;Mark S. Goldman

  • Expectancy challenge and drinking reduction: process and structure in the alcohol expectancy network.

    Jack Darkes;Mark S. Goldman

  • The college and noncollege experience: a review of the factors that influence drinking behavior in young adulthood.

    Ashlee C. Carter;Karen Obremski Brandon;Mark S. Goldman

  • Variation in the drinking trajectories of freshmen college students

    Paul E. Greenbaum;Frances K. Del Boca;Jack Darkes;Chen pin Wang

  • Age and Drinking-Related Differences in the Memory Organization of Alcohol Expectancies in 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th Grade Children

    Michael E. Dunn;Mark S. Goldman

  • Self-reported drinking and alcohol-related problems among early adolescents: dimensionality and validity over 24 months

    Gregory T. Smith;Denis M. McCarthy;Mark S. Goldman

  • Empirical modeling of an alcohol expectancy memory network in elementary school children as a function of grade.

    Michael E. Dunn;Mark S. Goldman

  • Adolescents are not adults: developmental considerations in alcohol users.

    Deborah Deas;Paula Riggs;James Langenbucher;Mark S Goldman

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul E. Greenbaum
Paul E. Greenbaum University of South Florida
Gregory T. Smith
Gregory T. Smith University of Kentucky
Sandra A. Brown
Sandra A. Brown University of California, San Diego
Emanuel Donchin
Emanuel Donchin University of South Florida
James MacKillop
James MacKillop McMaster University
David J. Drobes
David J. Drobes University of South Florida
Mark A. Ferro
Mark A. Ferro University of Waterloo
Kenneth J. Sher
Kenneth J. Sher University of Missouri
Peter E. Nathan
Peter E. Nathan University of Iowa
Sara Jo Nixon
Sara Jo Nixon University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to various rewarding careers, especially in mental health and counseling. One popular pathway is becoming a substance abuse counselor, a role that is in high demand across the country. Each state — and even individual cities — can have its own education, training, and licensure requirements.

For instance, those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Long Beach need to complete specific educational programs and supervised clinical hours. Navigating the Los Angeles substance abuse counselors education requirements is essential for those who wish to practice in that city, which may include state-approved certification and ongoing professional development.

Requirements also differ city by city — those exploring Louisville substance abuse counselor certification requirements or learning about how to become a substance abuse counselor in Lubbock will find varying paths related to degree levels, supervised hours, and state exams. Researching these pathways will help you align your online psychology studies with the right career and location for your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Mark S. Goldman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles