World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
7953
World Ranking
6711
National Ranking
3638

Paul E. Greenbaum publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul E. Greenbaum sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 93 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paul E. Greenbaum D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul E. Greenbaum sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul E. Greenbaum is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their academic profile is centered within this institution, representing their primary professional environment.

The scientist's research work is characterized by a focus on a range of scientific inquiries, although specific details regarding fields of study, subfields, and main topics have not been enumerated in the available data.

There are no listed recent papers, precluding an overview of their latest contributions or specific thematic emphases. Similarly, information on frequent co-authors and frequent publication venues is not available, which limits insight into collaborative patterns and preferred journals or conferences.

No recorded book publications have been documented, so it is unclear whether the scientist has contributed to academic publishing in monograph format or as an editor.

There is also an absence of data on awards or honors, and no indication that the scientist is deceased, confirming their status as currently living.

Best Publications

  • Up close and personal: temporal variability in the drinking of individual college students during their first year.

    Frances K. Del Boca;Jack Darkes;Paul E. Greenbaum;Mark S. Goldman

  • Expectancy for social facilitation from drinking: The divergent paths of high-expectancy and low-expectancy adolescents.

    Gregory T. Smith;Mark S. Goldman;Paul E. Greenbaum;Bruce A. Christiansen

  • National Adolescent and Child Treatment Study (NACTS) Outcomes for Children with Serious Emotional and Behavioral Disturbance

    Paul E. Greenbaum;Robert F. Dedrick;Robert M. Friedman;Krista Kutash

  • Variation in the drinking trajectories of freshmen college students

    Paul E. Greenbaum;Frances K. Del Boca;Jack Darkes;Chen pin Wang

  • Treating adolescent drug abuse: a randomized trial comparing multidimensional family therapy and cognitive behavior therapy

    Howard A. Liddle;Gayle A. Dakof;Ralph M. Turner;Craig E. Henderson

  • Multidimensional family therapy for young adolescent substance abuse: Twelve-month outcomes of a randomized controlled trial

    Howard A. Liddle;Cynthia L. Rowe;Gayle A. Dakof;Craig E. Henderson

  • Construct Validity of the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory (YPI) and the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD) With Justice-Involved Adolescents

    Norman G. Poythress;Richard Dembo;Jennifer Wareham;Paul E. Greenbaum

  • Five methods for computing significant individual client change and improvement rates: support for an individual growth curve approach.

    David C. Speer;Paul E. Greenbaum

  • Impact of psychiatric comorbidity on treatment of adolescent drug abusers

    Cynthia L Rowe;Howard A Liddle;Paul E Greenbaum;Craig E Henderson

  • Mother-child patterns of coping with anticipatory medical stress

    Joseph P. Bush;Barbara G. Melamed;Peter L. Sheras;Paul E. Greenbaum

  • Substance Abuse Prevalence and Comorbidity with Other Psychiatric Disorders among Adolescents with Severe Emotional Disturbances

    Paul E. Greenbaum;Mark E. Prange;Robert M. Friedman;Starr E. Silver

  • Effectiveness of screening instruments in detecting substance use disorders among prisoners.

    Roger H. Peters;Paul E. Greenbaum;Marc L. Steinberg;Chris R. Carter

  • Prevalence of DSM-IV substance abuse and dependence disorders among prison inmates.

    Roger H. Peters;Paul E. Greenbaum;John F. Edens;Chris R. Carter

  • Factors Associated with Community Adjustment of Young Adults with Serious Emotional Disturbance: A Longitudinal Analysis.

    Kathleen H. Armstrong;Robert F. Dedrick;Paul E. Greenbaum

  • A Confirmatory Test of Hierarchical Expectancy Structure and Predictive Power: Discriminant Validation of the Alcohol Expectancy Questionnaire.

    Mark S Goldman;Paul E. Greenbaum;Jack Darkes

  • Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis of a Scale Measuring Interagency Collaboration of Children’s Mental Health Agencies

    Robert F. Dedrick;Paul E. Greenbaum

  • Effectiveness of multidimensional family therapy with higher severity substance-abusing adolescents: Report from two randomized controlled trials

    Craig E. Henderson;Gayle A. Dakof;Paul E. Greenbaum;Howard A. Liddle

  • CO‐OCCURRING ADDICTIVE AND MENTAL DISORDERS AMONG ADOLESCENTS: Prevalence Research and Future Directions

    Paul E. Greenbaum;Lynn Foster‐Johnson;Amelia Petrila

  • Hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis of the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18.

    Paul E. Greenbaum;Robert F. Dedrick

  • Family functioning and psychopathology among adolescents with severe emotional disturbances

    Mark E. Prange;Paul E. Greenbaum;Starr E. Silver;Robert M. Friedman

  • Regular article Impact of psychiatric comorbidity on treatment of adolescent drug abusers

    Cynthia L. Rowe;Howard A. Liddle;Paul E. Greenbaum;Craig E. Henderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark S. Goldman
Mark S. Goldman University of South Florida
Howard A. Liddle
Howard A. Liddle University of Miami
Craig E. Henderson
Craig E. Henderson Sam Houston State University
Gayle A. Dakof
Gayle A. Dakof University of Miami
Richard Dembo
Richard Dembo University of South Florida
Steven Belenko
Steven Belenko Temple University
Ken C. Winters
Ken C. Winters Oregon Research Institute
James Schmeidler
James Schmeidler Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Gregory T. Smith
Gregory T. Smith University of Kentucky
Glen Dunlap
Glen Dunlap University of South Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up a variety of online degree options and specialized career pathways. Many students start with a bachelor’s degree in psychology, then move on to graduate programs focused on counseling, clinical psychology, or mental health services. Online programs offer flexibility for students managing work or family commitments while pursuing their education.

Becoming a licensed mental health counselor requires specific steps depending on your state or city. For those researching Cincinnati mental health counselor education requirements, you'll discover the need for a graduate degree and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, students who wish to become a mental health counselor in Cleveland should be aware of Ohio's licensure process, which often matches national standards. In other locations, such as Colorado, the Colorado Springs mental health counselor certification requirements may require additional state-specific exams. Aspiring counselors in Columbus should consult the Columbus mental health counselor education requirements to map out their academic and practical experience.

Choosing the right online program and understanding local licensure is crucial for successfully launching a career in mental health counseling or psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Paul E. Greenbaum

Trending Scientists