World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 34 12250 11893 4963 4739 96 4403

Abdollah Dehzangi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Abdollah Dehzangi between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Abdollah Dehzangi published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2022. 29 of the 156 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2022. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 15 publications
2007 2025

156 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Abdollah Dehzangi: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 0
2009 2
2010 3
2011 3
2012 3
2013 8
2014 9
2015 10
2016 5
2017 7
2018 7
2019 13
2020 15
2021 13
2022 17
2023 11
2024 14
2025 15
Total 156
Download as CSV

Abdollah Dehzangi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abdollah Dehzangi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 92–101 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 96 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421 96
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Abdollah Dehzangi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abdollah Dehzangi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918 34
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Abdollah Dehzangi is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a strong emphasis on Molecular Biology. Additional focus areas include Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Microbiology.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, notably Machine Learning in Bioinformatics, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, Protein Structure and Dynamics, Computational Drug Discovery Methods, COVID-19 diagnosis using AI, and Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities.

Recent publications by Abdollah Dehzangi include:

  • Accurate brain tumor detection using deep convolutional neural network (2022) in Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
  • A review on deep learning approaches in healthcare systems: Taxonomies, challenges, and open issues (2020) in Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • Application of explainable artificial intelligence in medical health: A systematic review of interpretability methods (2023) in Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
  • ACP-MHCNN: an accurate multi-headed deep-convolutional neural network to predict anticancer peptides (2021) in Scientific Reports
  • CNN-KCL: Automatic myocarditis diagnosis using convolutional neural network combined with k-means clustering (2022) in Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering

Their frequent collaborators include Alok Sharma, Hamid Alinejad-Rokny, Swakkhar Shatabda, Shahab S. Band, and Amin Beheshti.

Abdollah Dehzangi has published frequently in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Preprints.org, Scientific Reports, Genes, and arXiv (Cornell University).

Best Publications

  • Improving prediction of secondary structure, local backbone angles, and solvent accessible surface area of proteins by iterative deep learning.

    Rhys Heffernan;Kuldip Paliwal;James Lyons;Abdollah Dehzangi

  • A review on deep learning approaches in healthcare systems: Taxonomies, challenges, and open issues.

    Shahab Shamshirband;Shahab Shamshirband;Mahdis Fathi;Abdollah Dehzangi;Anthony Theodore Chronopoulos

  • Gram-positive and Gram-negative protein subcellular localization by incorporating evolutionary-based descriptors into Chou׳s general PseAAC

    Abdollah Dehzangi;Abdollah Dehzangi;Rhys Heffernan;Alok Sharma;Alok Sharma;James Lyons

  • SPIDER2: A Package to Predict Secondary Structure, Accessible Surface Area, and Main-Chain Torsional Angles by Deep Neural Networks

    Yuedong Yang;Rhys Heffernan;Kuldip Paliwal;James Lyons

  • Predicting backbone Cα angles and dihedrals from protein sequences by stacked sparse auto-encoder deep neural network.

    James G. Lyons;Abdollah Dehzangi;Abdollah Dehzangi;Rhys Heffernan;Alok Sharma;Alok Sharma

  • A feature extraction technique using bi-gram probabilities of position specific scoring matrix for protein fold recognition.

    Alok Sharma;James Lyons;Abdollah Dehzangi;Abdollah Dehzangi;Kuldip Kumar Paliwal

  • Highly accurate sequence-based prediction of half-sphere exposures of amino acid residues in proteins

    Rhys Heffernan;Abdollah Dehzangi;Abdollah Dehzangi;James G. Lyons;Kuldip K. Paliwal

  • iDTI-ESBoost: Identification of Drug Target Interaction Using Evolutionary and Structural Features with Boosting.

    Farshid Rayhan;Sajid Ahmed;Swakkhar Shatabda;Dewan Md Farid

  • iDNAProt-ES: Identification of DNA-binding Proteins Using Evolutionary and Structural Features

    Shahana Yasmin Chowdhury;Swakkhar Shatabda;Abdollah Dehzangi

  • PyFeat: A Python-based Effective Feature Generation Tool for DNA, RNA, and Protein Sequences.

    Rafsanjani Muhammod;Sajid Ahmed;Dewan M. Farid;Swakkhar Shatabda

  • Predict Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Subcellular Localization via Incorporating Evolutionary Information and Physicochemical Features Into Chou's General PseAAC

    Ronesh Sharma;Abdollah Dehzangi;James Lyons;Kuldip Paliwal

  • Computer-aided decision-making for predicting liver disease using PSO-based optimized SVM with feature selection

    Javad Hassannataj Joloudari;Hamid Saadatfar;Abdollah Dehzangi;Shahaboddin Shamshirband

  • SPIN2: Predicting sequence profiles from protein structures using deep neural networks.

    James O'Connell;Zhixiu Li;Jack Hanson;Rhys Heffernan

  • PSSM-Suc: Accurately predicting succinylation using position specific scoring matrix into bigram for feature extraction

    Abdollah Dehzangi;Yosvany López;Sunil Pranit Lal;Ghazaleh Taherzadeh

  • A Tri-Gram Based Feature Extraction Technique Using Linear Probabilities of Position Specific Scoring Matrix for Protein Fold Recognition

    Kuldip K. Paliwal;Alok Sharma;James Lyons;Abdollah Dehzangi

  • Proposing a highly accurate protein structural class predictor using segmentation-based features.

    Abdollah Dehzangi;Abdollah Dehzangi;Kuldip K. Paliwal;James G. Lyons;Alok Sharma;Alok Sharma

  • A Combination of Feature Extraction Methods with an Ensemble of Different Classifiers for Protein Structural Class Prediction Problem

    Abdollah Dehzangi;Kuldip Paliwal;Alok Sharma;Omid Dehzangi

  • Using random forest for protein fold prediction problem: An empirical study

    Abdollah Dehzangi;Somnuk Phon-Amnuaisuk;Omid Dehzangi

  • SPRINT-Gly: predicting N- and O-linked glycosylation sites of human and mouse proteins by using sequence and predicted structural properties.

    Ghazaleh Taherzadeh;Abdollah Dehzangi;Maryam Golchin;Yaoqi Zhou

  • A strategy to select suitable physicochemical attributes of amino acids for protein fold recognition.

    Alok Sharma;Alok Sharma;Kuldip Kumar Paliwal;Abdollah Dehzangi;James Lyons

  • Improving succinylation prediction accuracy by incorporating the secondary structure via helix, strand and coil, and evolutionary information from profile bigrams.

    Abdollah Dehzangi;Yosvany López;Sunil Pranit Lal;Ghazaleh Taherzadeh

  • Success: evolutionary and structural properties of amino acids prove effective for succinylation site prediction.

    Yosvany López;Alok Sharma;Alok Sharma;Abdollah Dehzangi;Sunil Pranit Lal

Frequent Co-Authors

Alok Sharma
Alok Sharma Griffith University
Abdul Sattar
Abdul Sattar Griffith University
Kuldip K. Paliwal
Kuldip K. Paliwal Griffith University
Tatsuhiko Tsunoda
Tatsuhiko Tsunoda University of Tokyo
Yaoqi Zhou
Yaoqi Zhou Griffith University
Yuedong Yang
Yuedong Yang Sun Yat-sen University
Satoru Miyano
Satoru Miyano Tokyo Medical and Dental University
Shoba Ranganathan
Shoba Ranganathan Macquarie University
Bhyravabhotla Jayaram
Bhyravabhotla Jayaram Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
Kenta Nakai
Kenta Nakai University of Tokyo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Computer Science doesn't always require a traditional, in-person degree path. Many students opt for flexible online programs that fit their schedule and budget. For those just starting, an online associate's degree in computer science can provide a solid foundation and open doors to entry-level tech roles or further study.

If you’re aiming higher, choosing which master's degree is most in demand in usa is a smart move. Master’s programs in data science, AI, and cybersecurity are especially valuable and can lead to highly sought-after positions.

It’s important to consider cost and admission requirements as well. There are plenty of most affordable online colleges that offer computer science programs, making higher education more accessible. Likewise, those with a lower GPA can still pursue their dreams by applying to online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa and work towards a career in the tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Abdollah Dehzangi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles