World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Australia
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
65
Citations
12733
World Ranking
2501
National Ranking
75

Yaoqi Zhou publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yaoqi Zhou sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 174 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Yaoqi Zhou D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yaoqi Zhou sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Yaoqi Zhou is affiliated with Griffith University in Australia and has an extensive publication record primarily in the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their research contributions span various subfields including Molecular Biology, Geology, Infectious Diseases, Materials Chemistry, and Plant Science.

Their work frequently addresses topics related to RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, machine learning applications in bioinformatics, genomics and phylogenetic studies, protein structure and dynamics, RNA modifications and cancer, RNA research and splicing, as well as hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction, 2021, Nature Methods
  • Structure-aware protein-protein interaction site prediction using deep graph convolutional network, 2021, Bioinformatics
  • Improved RNA secondary structure and tertiary base-pairing prediction using evolutionary profile, mutational coupling and two-dimensional transfer learning, 2021, Bioinformatics
  • DescribePROT: database of amino acid-level protein structure and function predictions, 2020, Nucleic Acids Research
  • Multiple sequence alignment-based RNA language model and its application to structural inference, 2023, Nucleic Acids Research

Yaoqi Zhou has published extensively in several venues, with notable contributions in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Bioinformatics
  • Nucleic Acids Research
  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • Goldschmidt Abstracts

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Zhou's research, with frequent co-authors including Jian Zhan, Thomas Litfin, Jaswinder Singh, Kuldip K. Paliwal, and Jaspreet Singh. This network reflects a multidisciplinary approach to scientific inquiry.

Best Publications

  • Capturing non-local interactions by long short-term memory bidirectional recurrent neural networks for improving prediction of protein secondary structure, backbone angles, contact numbers and solvent accessibility.

    Rhys Heffernan;Yuedong Yang;Kuldip K. Paliwal;Yaoqi Zhou

  • Real-time reliable determination of binding kinetics of DNA hybridization using a multi-channel graphene biosensor

    Shicai Xu;Jian Zhan;Baoyuan Man;Shouzhen Jiang

  • Improving protein fold recognition and template-based modeling by employing probabilistic-based matching between predicted one-dimensional structural properties of query and corresponding native properties of templates

    Yuedong Yang;Eshel Faraggi;Huiying Zhao;Yaoqi Zhou

  • RNA secondary structure prediction using an ensemble of two-dimensional deep neural networks and transfer learning.

    Jaswinder Singh;Jack Hanson;Kuldip Paliwal;Yaoqi Zhou

  • Improving prediction of secondary structure, local backbone angles, and solvent accessible surface area of proteins by iterative deep learning.

    Rhys Heffernan;Kuldip Paliwal;James Lyons;Abdollah Dehzangi

  • Improving protein disorder prediction by deep bidirectional long short-term memory recurrent neural networks.

    Jack Hanson;Yuedong Yang;Kuldip K. Paliwal;Yaoqi Zhou

  • Protein binding site prediction using an empirical scoring function

    Shide Liang;Chi Zhang;Song Liu;Yaoqi Zhou

  • Fold recognition by combining sequence profiles derived from evolution and from depth‐dependent structural alignment of fragments

    Hongyi Zhou;Yaoqi Zhou

  • SPINE X: Improving protein secondary structure prediction by multistep learning coupled with prediction of solvent accessible surface area and backbone torsion angles

    Eshel Faraggi;Tuo Zhang;Tuo Zhang;Yuedong Yang;Yuedong Yang;Lukasz A. Kurgan;Lukasz A. Kurgan

  • Sixty-five years of the long march in protein secondary structure prediction: the final stretch?

    Yuedong Yang;Jianzhao Gao;Jihua Wang;Rhys Heffernan

  • Single-body residue-level knowledge-based energy score combined with sequence-profile and secondary structure information for fold recognition

    Hongyi Zhou;Yaoqi Zhou

  • Improving prediction of protein secondary structure, backbone angles, solvent accessibility and contact numbers by using predicted contact maps and an ensemble of recurrent and residual convolutional neural networks

    Jack Hanson;Kuldip K. Paliwal;Thomas Litfin;Yuedong Yang

  • Folding rate prediction using total contact distance.

    Hongyi Zhou;Yaoqi Zhou

  • SPINE-D: Accurate Prediction of Short and Long Disordered Regions by a Single Neural-Network Based Method

    Tuo Zhang;Eshel Faraggi;Bin Xue;A. Keith Dunker

  • Accurate prediction of protein contact maps by coupling residual two-dimensional bidirectional long short-term memory with convolutional neural networks.

    Jack Hanson;Kuldip K. Paliwal;Thomas Litfin;Yuedong Yang;Yuedong Yang

  • Achieving 80% ten‐fold cross‐validated accuracy for secondary structure prediction by large‐scale training

    Ofer Dor;Yaoqi Zhou

  • SPIDER2: A Package to Predict Secondary Structure, Accessible Surface Area, and Main-Chain Torsional Angles by Deep Neural Networks

    Yuedong Yang;Rhys Heffernan;Kuldip Paliwal;James Lyons

  • Predicting backbone Cα angles and dihedrals from protein sequences by stacked sparse auto-encoder deep neural network.

    James G. Lyons;Abdollah Dehzangi;Abdollah Dehzangi;Rhys Heffernan;Alok Sharma;Alok Sharma

  • Structure-aware protein-protein interaction site prediction using deep graph convolutional network.

    Qianmu Yuan;Jianwen Chen;Huiying Zhao;Yaoqi Zhou

  • SPOT-Disorder2: Improved Protein Intrinsic Disorder Prediction by Ensembled Deep Learning

    Jack Hanson;Kuldip K. Paliwal;Thomas Litfin;Yaoqi Zhou

  • Community-wide assessment of protein-interface modeling suggests improvements to design methodology

    Sarel J. Fleishman;Sarel J. Fleishman;Timothy A. Whitehead;Eva Maria Strauch;Jacob E. Corn;Jacob E. Corn

  • Improving the prediction accuracy of residue solvent accessibility and real-value backbone torsion angles of proteins by guided-learning through a two-layer neural network.

    Eshel Faraggi;Bin Xue;Bin Xue;Yaoqi Zhou;Yaoqi Zhou

Frequent Co-Authors

Yuedong Yang
Yuedong Yang Sun Yat-sen University
Kuldip K. Paliwal
Kuldip K. Paliwal Griffith University
Chi Zhang
Chi Zhang Hohai University
David Neil Cooper
David Neil Cooper Cardiff University
Matthew Mort
Matthew Mort Cardiff University
Yunlong Liu
Yunlong Liu Indiana University
Abdul Sattar
Abdul Sattar Griffith University
Abdollah Dehzangi
Abdollah Dehzangi Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Lukasz Kurgan
Lukasz Kurgan Virginia Commonwealth University
Alok Sharma
Alok Sharma Griffith University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in expanding your tech career beyond traditional Computer Science programs? Today’s educational landscape offers a wide range of flexible online degrees and credentials that can fast-track your entry into in-demand fields.

For those curious about data analytics, following a data science learning path can provide specialized skills in data processing, AI, and statistical modeling. Data scientists are highly sought-after in multiple industries, making it a practical next step for many students.

Engineering enthusiasts can opt for the convenience of remote study while keeping tuition costs in check. There are many programs that focus on electrical engineering online tuition costs to help you budget and plan for your degree.

Looking for faster credentials? Some schools offer easy licenses and certifications to get that open doors to rewarding, high-paying tech jobs with minimal time investment.

If earning a graduate credential quickly is your aim, you can explore the quickest online masters degree programs available. These allow you to further specialize and improve your job prospects with minimal delay.

Best Scientists Citing Yaoqi Zhou

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles