World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 65 2850 2615 1643 1474 304 14723

Ananda B. Amstadter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ananda B. Amstadter between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ananda B. Amstadter published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 16.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2021. 36 of the 332 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2021. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 19 publications
2006 2025

332 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ananda B. Amstadter: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 6
2008 8
2009 21
2010 12
2011 23
2012 20
2013 11
2014 11
2015 14
2016 7
2017 20
2018 21
2019 23
2020 30
2021 35
2022 22
2023 11
2024 17
2025 19
Total 332
Download as CSV

Ananda B. Amstadter publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ananda B. Amstadter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 304 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102 304
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ananda B. Amstadter D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ananda B. Amstadter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 65
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ananda B. Amstadter is affiliated with Virginia Commonwealth University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields with a focus on Psychology and Medicine, contributing notably within Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Sociology and Political Science, Genetics, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

The scientist's work covers a range of research topics including:

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol

Significant recent publications by Amstadter include:

  • A Systematic Review of the Self-Medication Hypothesis in the Context of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Comorbid Problematic Alcohol Use (2020, Journal of Traumatic Stress)
  • Depression, Anxiety, Resilience, and Coping: The Experience of Pregnant and New Mothers During the First Few Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021, Journal of Women's Health)
  • Epigenome-wide meta-analysis of PTSD across 10 military and civilian cohorts identifies methylation changes in AHRR (2020, Nature Communications)
  • Genome-wide association analyses identify 95 risk loci and provide insights into the neurobiology of post-traumatic stress disorder (2024, Nature Genetics)
  • Trauma-related drinking to cope: A novel approach to the self-medication model (2020, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors)

Amstadter researches frequently appear in these publication venues:

  • European Journal of Psychotraumatology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress
  • Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
  • Journal of American College Health

Collaborative work is a notable aspect of their career. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Kaitlin E. Bountress
  • Christina M. Sheerin
  • Danielle M. Dick
  • Shannon E. Cusack
  • Adam X. Maihofer

Best Publications

  • Prevalence and correlates of emotional, physical, sexual, and financial abuse and potential neglect in the United States: the National Elder Mistreatment Study.

    Ron E. Acierno;Melba A. Hernández;Ananda B. Amstadter;Heidi S. Resnick

  • International meta-analysis of PTSD genome-wide association studies identifies sex- and ancestry-specific genetic risk loci

    Caroline M. Nievergelt;Caroline M. Nievergelt;Adam X. Maihofer;Adam X. Maihofer;Torsten Klengel;Torsten Klengel;Elizabeth G. Atkinson;Elizabeth G. Atkinson

  • Largest GWAS of PTSD (N=20 070) yields genetic overlap with schizophrenia and sex differences in heritability

    L. E. Duncan;A. Ratanatharathorn;A. E. Aiello;L. M. Almli

  • Emotion regulation and anxiety disorders

    Unknown

  • Is Reporting of Rape on the Rise? A Comparison of Women With Reported Versus Unreported Rape Experiences in the National Women’s Study-Replication

    Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Heidi S. Resnick;Jenna L. McCauley;Ananda B. Amstadter

  • Internet-based interventions for traumatic stress-related mental health problems: a review and suggestion for future research.

    Ananda B. Amstadter;Joshua Broman-Fulks;Heidi Zinzow;Kenneth J. Ruggiero

  • Offspring psychological and biological correlates of parental posttraumatic stress: review of the literature and research agenda.

    Ellen W. Leen-Feldner;Matthew T. Feldner;Matthew T. Feldner;Ashley Arehart Knapp;Liviu Bunaciu;Liviu Bunaciu

  • Genetic determinants of depression: recent findings and future directions.

    Erin C. Dunn;Ruth C. Brown;Yael Dai;Jonathan Rosand

  • Reporting Rape in a National Sample of College Women

    Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Heidi S. Resnick;Ananda B. Amstadter;Jenna L. McCauley

  • Genetics of post-traumatic stress disorder: review and recommendations for genome-wide association studies.

    Marilyn C. Cornelis;Nicole R. Nugent;Ananda B. Amstadter;Karestan C. Koenen

  • Emotional Reactions During and After Trauma: A Comparison of Trauma Types

    Unknown

  • Exposure to interpersonal violence and risk for PTSD, depression, delinquency, and binge drinking among adolescents: Data from the NSA-R

    Josh M. Cisler;Angela M. Begle;Ananda B. Amstadter;Heidi S. Resnick

  • Longitudinal pathways of victimization, substance use, and delinquency: Findings from the National Survey of Adolescents.

    Angela M. Begle;Rochelle F. Hanson;Carla Kmett Danielson;Michael R. McCart

  • Primum non nocere: an evolutionary analysis of whether antidepressants do more harm than good.

    Paul William Andrews;J. Anderson Thomson;Ananda Amstadter;Michael C Neale

  • Relations among gender, violence exposure, and mental health: the national survey of adolescents

    Rochelle F. Hanson;Cameo Borntrager;Shannon Self-Brown;Dean G. Kilpatrick

  • Modification of the Association Between Serotonin Transporter Genotype and Risk of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Adults by County-Level Social Environment

    Karestan C. Koenen;Allison E. Aiello;Erin Bakshis;Ananda B. Amstadter

  • Prevalence and risk of psychiatric disorders as a function of variant rape histories: results from a national survey of women

    Heidi M. Zinzow;Heidi S. Resnick;Jenna L. McCauley;Ananda B. Amstadter

  • Trauma-Related Risk Factors for Substance Abuse Among Male Versus Female Young Adults

    Carla Kmett Danielson;Ananda B. Amstadter;Ruth E. Dangelmaier;Heidi S. Resnick

  • Genetics of PTSD: Fear Conditioning as a Model for Future Research.

    Ananda B. Amstadter;Nicole R. Nugent;Karestan C. Koenen

  • Psychiatric resilience: longitudinal twin study

    Ananda B. Amstadter;John M. Myers;Kenneth S. Kendler

  • The Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Workgroup: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Enters the Age of Large-Scale Genomic Collaboration

    Mark W Logue;Ananda B Amstadter;Dewleen G Baker;Laramie Duncan

  • Prevalence and Correlates of Elder Mistreatment in South Carolina: The South Carolina Elder Mistreatment Study:

    Ananda B. Amstadter;Kristyn Zajac;Martha Strachan;Melba A. Hernández

Frequent Co-Authors

Dean G. Kilpatrick
Dean G. Kilpatrick Medical University of South Carolina
Kenneth J. Ruggiero
Kenneth J. Ruggiero Medical University of South Carolina
Ron Acierno
Ron Acierno The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Nicole R. Nugent
Nicole R. Nugent Brown University
Karestan C. Koenen
Karestan C. Koenen Harvard University
Carla Kmett Danielson
Carla Kmett Danielson Medical University of South Carolina
Heidi S. Resnick
Heidi S. Resnick Medical University of South Carolina
Kenneth S. Kendler
Kenneth S. Kendler Virginia Commonwealth University
Danielle M. Dick
Danielle M. Dick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Caroline M. Nievergelt
Caroline M. Nievergelt University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens various online learning options and diverse career pathways. One of the most popular routes is social work, which blends psychological knowledge with hands-on community impact. Each state in the U.S. has specific steps for becoming a licensed social worker. Understanding these requirements is essential for future career planning.

For example, if you’re considering practicing in Michigan, it’s important to familiarize yourself with Michigan social work license requirements. Those interested in working in Minnesota should review the Minnesota social work education requirements. In Mississippi, professionals must adhere to specific Mississippi social work license requirements, and individuals aiming to work in Missouri should consult the detailed Missouri social work license requirements.

By understanding these requirements early on, psychology students can tailor their studies toward the qualifications needed for a rewarding social work career. Online degrees provide added flexibility and accessibility for those balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Ananda B. Amstadter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles