World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 62 1278 1131 592 515 420 13630

XinQi Dong publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by XinQi Dong between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. XinQi Dong published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 18 papers a year. Output peaked at 53 publications in 2018. 7 of the 449 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 53. Peak 53 publications in 2018. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 49 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 47 publications 2018: 53 publications 2019: 53 publications 2020: 43 publications 2021: 45 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 6 publications
2001 2025

449 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
XinQi Dong: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 3
2004 0
2005 2
2006 2
2007 2
2008 10
2009 7
2010 10
2011 11
2012 17
2013 15
2014 49
2015 22
2016 29
2017 47
2018 53
2019 53
2020 43
2021 45
2022 18
2023 3
2024 1
2025 6
Total 449
Download as CSV

XinQi Dong publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where XinQi Dong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 414–423 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 420 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20 420
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

XinQi Dong D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where XinQi Dong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94 62
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

XinQi Dong is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with a focus on areas related to health, aging, and caregiving.

The main fields of study covered in their work include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Subfields of study contributing to their research portfolio are:

  • Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Health Professions
  • Demography

Prominent research topics examined by XinQi Dong include:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, among whom are:

  • Mengting Li
  • Bei Wu
  • Dexia Kong
  • Stephanie Bergren
  • Man Guo

Their publications appear prominently in journals specializing in aging and mental health. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • Aging & Mental Health
  • Research on Aging
  • Journal of Aging and Health
  • Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect

Some of XinQi Dong's recent papers are:

  • "Artificial intelligence with multi-functional machine learning platform development for better healthcare and precision medicine," 2020, Database
  • "Human gene and disease associations for clinical-genomics and precision medicine research," 2020, Clinical and Translational Medicine
  • "Longitudinal Association Between Hearing Loss, Vision Loss, Dual Sensory Loss, and Cognitive Decline," 2020, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • "Education, Social Engagement, and Cognitive Function: A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis," 2023, The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • "Advancing clinical genomics and precision medicine with GVViZ: FAIR bioinformatics platform for variable gene-disease annotation, visualization, and expression analysis," 2021, Human Genomics

Best Publications

  • Artificial intelligence with multi-functional machine learning platform development for better healthcare and precision medicine

    Zeeshan Ahmed;Khalid Mohamed;Saman Zeeshan;Xin Qi Dong

  • Elder Abuse: Systematic Review and Implications for Practice

    Xin Qi Dong

  • Elder self-neglect and abuse and mortality risk in a community-dwelling population.

    Xin Qi Dong;Melissa Simon;Carlos Mendes De Leon;Terry Fulmer

  • Elder Abuse as a Risk Factor for Hospitalization in Older Persons

    Xin Qi Dong;Melissa A. Simon

  • Integrating cultural humility into health care professional education and training

    E-shien Chang;Melissa Simon;XinQi Dong

  • Human gene and disease associations for clinical-genomics and precision medicine research

    Zeeshan Ahmed;Saman Zeeshan;Dinesh Mendhe;XinQi Dong

  • Elder Abuse and Psychological Well-Being: A Systematic Review and Implications for Research and Policy - A Mini Review

    XinQi Dong;RuiJia Chen;E-Shien Chang;Melissa Simon

  • Elder Abuse and Neglect in an Urban Chinese Population

    Xinqi Dong;Melissa A. Simon;Martin Gorbien

  • Medical Implications of Elder Abuse and Neglect

    XinQi Dong

  • Cognitive decline after hospitalization in a community population of older persons

    R.S. Wilson;L.E. Hebert;P.A. Scherr;X. Dong

  • Study design and implementation of the PINE study.

    XinQi Dong;Esther Wong;Melissa A. Simon

  • Elder abuse and mortality: the role of psychological and social wellbeing.

    X.Q. Dong;M.A. Simon;T.T. Beck;C. Farran

  • Demographic characteristics of U.S. Chinese older adults in the Greater Chicago area: assessing the representativeness of the PINE study.

    Melissa A. Simon;E-Shien Chang;Kumar Bharat Rajan;Mary Jane Welch

  • Elder Abuse And Dementia: A Review Of The Research And Health Policy

    XinQi Q. Dong;Ruijia Chen;Melissa A. Simon

  • Perception and Negative Effect of Loneliness in a Chicago Chinese Population of Older Adults

    XinQi Dong;E-Shien Chang;Esther Wong;Melissa Simon

  • Depression and elder abuse and neglect among a community-dwelling Chinese elderly population

    Xinqi Dong;Melissa A. Simon;Richard Odwazny;Martin Gorbien

  • Loneliness in Older Chinese Adults: A Risk Factor for Elder Mistreatment

    XinQi Dong;Melissa A. Simon;Martin Gorbien;Jeffrey Percak

  • The associations of gender, depression and elder mistreatment in a community-dwelling Chinese population: The modifying effect of social support

    XinQi Dong;Todd Beck;Melissa A. Simon

  • Health and aging in a Chinese population: urban and rural disparities

    XinQi Dong;XinQi Dong;Melissa Andrea Simon

  • Elder Abuse and Self-neglect: “I Don't Care Anything About Going to the Doctor, to Be Honest. . . . ”

    Laura Mosqueda;XinQi Dong

Frequent Co-Authors

Melissa A. Simon
Melissa A. Simon Northwestern University
Bei Wu
Bei Wu New York University
Denis A. Evans
Denis A. Evans Rush University Medical Center
Iris Chi
Iris Chi University of Southern California
Carlos F. Mendes de Leon
Carlos F. Mendes de Leon Georgetown University
Robert S. Wilson
Robert S. Wilson Rush University Medical Center
Alicia K. Matthews
Alicia K. Matthews University of Illinois at Chicago
Agnes Tiwari
Agnes Tiwari University of Hong Kong
Merril Silverstein
Merril Silverstein Syracuse University
Erik J. A. Scherder
Erik J. A. Scherder Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing your education in Social Sciences and Humanities can open up diverse and rewarding career paths in areas such as counseling, social work, behavioral analysis, and public policy. Online education now offers flexible study options, making it easier to balance school, work, and personal life.

Those seeking to fast-track their education may consider 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees online, which provide a quicker route to a recognized qualification. Graduate studies are also increasingly accessible through an online master’s degree, allowing students to earn advanced credentials in as little as one year.

For those interested in impactful, service-oriented careers, social work is a popular choice. There are numerous most affordable msw programs online that allow future social workers to gain expertise without incurring significant debt. Similarly, if your interests lie in behavioral analysis, explore the cheapest bcba online program options, which prepare students for important roles in behavioral health fields.

These flexible, affordable online degrees support a variety of career pathways, making higher education in Social Sciences and Humanities more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing XinQi Dong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles