World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
50
Citations
18948
World Ranking
3993
National Ranking
1152

Mark E. Orazem publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Orazem sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 344 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Mark E. Orazem D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Orazem sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark E. Orazem is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected domains within engineering and materials science, with a focus on electrochemical processes and materials behavior.

The main fields of study for their work include:

  • Engineering
  • Materials Science

In terms of subfields, their research covers:

  • Materials Chemistry
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Electrochemistry
  • Bioengineering
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Orazem's research topics address several specialized areas such as:

  • Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
  • Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
  • Concrete Corrosion and Durability
  • Conducting Polymers and Applications
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Advanced Battery Technologies Research

They have published extensively, with frequent contributions to several scientific venues. The most common publication outlets include:

  • ECS Meeting Abstracts
  • Electrochimica Acta
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society
  • Corrosion Science
  • Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry

Recent papers attributed to Orazem or closely related to their research group include:

  • "Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy," 2021, Nature Reviews Methods Primers
  • "Impedance Analysis of Electrochemical Systems," 2022, Chemical Reviews
  • "Physical properties obtained from measurement model analysis of impedance measurements," 2020, Electrochimica Acta
  • "Application of the Kramers-Kronig Relations to Multi-Sine Electrochemical Impedance Measurements," 2020, Journal of The Electrochemical Society
  • "A tutorial on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy," 2020, ChemTexts

Throughout their career, Orazem has collaborated frequently with colleagues such as Chen You, Kevin J. Otto, Vincent Vivier, Arthur Dizon, and Bernard Tribollet. These coauthors have contributed to multiple publications, indicating ongoing research partnerships.

Best Publications

  • Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

    Shangshang Wang;Jianbo Zhang;Oumaïma Gharbi;Vincent Vivier

  • Determination of effective capacitance and film thickness from constant-phase-element parameters

    Bryan Hirschorn;Mark E. Orazem;Bernard Tribollet;Vincent Vivier

  • CPE analysis by local electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

    Jean-Baptiste Jorcin;Mark E. Orazem;Nadine Pébère;Bernard Tribollet

  • Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy: Orazem/Electrochemical

    Mark E. Orazem;Bernard Tribollet

  • Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

    Unknown

  • Impedance of steels in new and degraded ester based lubricating oil

    Kerry N. Allahar;Darryl P. Butt;Mark E. Orazem;Herbert A. Chin

  • Impedance Analysis of Electrochemical Systems.

    Unknown

  • Dielectric Properties of Materials Showing Constant-Phase-Element (CPE) Impedance Response

    Mark E. Orazem;Isabelle Frateur;Bernard Tribollet;Vincent Vivier

  • Enhanced Graphical Representation of Electrochemical Impedance Data

    Mark E. Orazem;Nadine Pébère;Bernard Tribollet

  • Constant-Phase-Element Behavior Caused by Resistivity Distributions in Films I. Theory

    Bryan Hirschorn;Mark E. Orazem;Bernard Tribollet;Vincent Vivier

  • Measurement Models for Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy I . Demonstration of Applicability

    Pankaj Agarwal;Mark E. Orazem;Luis H. Garcia‐Rubio

  • Constant-Phase-Element Behavior Caused by Resistivity Distributions in Films II. Applications

    Bryan Hirschorn;Mark E. Orazem;Bernard Tribollet;Vincent Vivier

  • Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

    Unknown

  • Application of Measurement Models to Impedance Spectroscopy III . Evaluation of Consistency with the Kramers‐Kronig Relations

    Pankaj Agarwal;Mark E. Orazem;Luis H. Garcia‐Rubio

  • The Apparent Constant-Phase-Element Behavior of a Disk Electrode with Faradaic Reactions A Global and Local Impedance Analysis

    Vicky Mei-Wen Huang;Vincent Vivier;Mark E. Orazem;Nadine Pébère

  • Comparison of different methods for measuring the passive film thickness on metals

    Marie Benoit;Christian Bataillon;Benoit Gwinner;Frédéric Miserque

  • Local electrochemical impedance spectroscopy: A review and some recent developments

    Vicky MeiWen Huang;Shao-Ling Wu;Mark E. Orazem;Nadine Pébère

  • The Apparent Constant-Phase-Element Behavior of an Ideally Polarized Blocking Electrode: A Global and Local Impedance Analysis

    Vicky Mei-Wen Huang;Vincent Vivier;Mark E. Orazem;Nadine Pébère

  • Interpretation of Low-Frequency Inductive Loops in PEM Fuel Cells

    Sunil K. Roy;Mark E. Orazem;Bernard Tribollet

  • Corrosion of Tungsten Microelectrodes used in Neural Recording Applications

    Erin Patrick;Mark E. Orazem;Justin C. Sanchez;Toshikazu Nishida

  • Application of Measurement Models to Impedance Spectroscopy II . Determination of the Stochastic Contribution to the Error Structure

    Pankaj Agarwal;Oscar D. Crisalle;Mark E. Orazem;Luis H. Garcia‐Rubio

  • Constant-phase-element behavior caused by inhomogeneous water uptake in anti-corrosion coatings

    Sylvain Amand;Marco Musiani;Mark E. Orazem;Nadine Pébère

  • The Global and Local Impedance Response of a Blocking Disk Electrode with Local Constant-Phase-Element Behavior

    Vicky Mei-Wen Huang;Vincent Vivier;Isabelle Frateur;Mark E. Orazem

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernard Tribollet
Bernard Tribollet Sorbonne University
Vincent Vivier
Vincent Vivier Sorbonne University
Nadine Pébère
Nadine Pébère Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Marco Musiani
Marco Musiani National Research Council (CNR)
Saeed Moghaddam
Saeed Moghaddam University of Florida
John Newman
John Newman University of California, Berkeley
Pankaj K. Agarwal
Pankaj K. Agarwal Duke University
Claude Deslouis
Claude Deslouis Université Paris Cité
Toshikazu Nishida
Toshikazu Nishida University of Florida
Kevin S. Jones
Kevin S. Jones University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in expanding your career options after studying Engineering and Technology in the USA, there are a variety of online degrees that can complement your technical background. For those wanting to enhance leadership and analytical skills, pursuing an mba in operations management can open doors to senior roles in manufacturing, supply chain, and project management.

Flexibility in admission requirements is also growing, with options like best online mba programs no gmat making it easier to enroll without standardized test scores. Budget-conscious students can find solid options such as an online mba under $30k, which ensures quality education without a heavy financial burden.

Additionally, the intersection of technology and marketing is a booming field. Consider exploring social media marketing schools to build expertise in digital communication and brand strategy—valuable assets for tech-savvy professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. Orazem

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles