World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 50 3993 3831 1152 1057 344 18948

Mark E. Orazem publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark E. Orazem between 1979 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark E. Orazem published across 48 years, from 1979 to 2026, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2008. 9 of the 420 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2008. 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 4 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 46 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
1979 2026

420 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark E. Orazem: publications per year, 1979 to 2026
Year Publications
1979 2
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 2
1984 5
1985 1
1986 4
1987 4
1988 3
1989 0
1990 5
1991 5
1992 7
1993 7
1994 2
1995 7
1996 10
1997 7
1998 6
1999 5
2000 2
2001 2
2002 1
2003 3
2004 5
2005 2
2006 20
2007 16
2008 46
2009 15
2010 8
2011 15
2012 9
2013 20
2014 19
2015 12
2016 16
2017 31
2018 9
2019 11
2020 21
2021 14
2022 7
2023 9
2024 15
2025 8
2026 1
Total 420
Download as CSV

Mark E. Orazem publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Orazem sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 338–347 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 344 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99 344
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark E. Orazem D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Orazem sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210 50
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark E. Orazem is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected domains within engineering and materials science, with a focus on electrochemical processes and materials behavior.

The main fields of study for their work include:

  • Engineering
  • Materials Science

In terms of subfields, their research covers:

  • Materials Chemistry
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Electrochemistry
  • Bioengineering
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Orazem's research topics address several specialized areas such as:

  • Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
  • Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
  • Concrete Corrosion and Durability
  • Conducting Polymers and Applications
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Advanced Battery Technologies Research

They have published extensively, with frequent contributions to several scientific venues. The most common publication outlets include:

  • ECS Meeting Abstracts
  • Electrochimica Acta
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society
  • Corrosion Science
  • Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry

Recent papers attributed to Orazem or closely related to their research group include:

  • "Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy," 2021, Nature Reviews Methods Primers
  • "Impedance Analysis of Electrochemical Systems," 2022, Chemical Reviews
  • "Physical properties obtained from measurement model analysis of impedance measurements," 2020, Electrochimica Acta
  • "Application of the Kramers-Kronig Relations to Multi-Sine Electrochemical Impedance Measurements," 2020, Journal of The Electrochemical Society
  • "A tutorial on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy," 2020, ChemTexts

Throughout their career, Orazem has collaborated frequently with colleagues such as Chen You, Kevin J. Otto, Vincent Vivier, Arthur Dizon, and Bernard Tribollet. These coauthors have contributed to multiple publications, indicating ongoing research partnerships.

Best Publications

  • Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

    Shangshang Wang;Jianbo Zhang;Oumaïma Gharbi;Vincent Vivier

  • Determination of effective capacitance and film thickness from constant-phase-element parameters

    Bryan Hirschorn;Mark E. Orazem;Bernard Tribollet;Vincent Vivier

  • CPE analysis by local electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

    Jean-Baptiste Jorcin;Mark E. Orazem;Nadine Pébère;Bernard Tribollet

  • Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy: Orazem/Electrochemical

    Mark E. Orazem;Bernard Tribollet

  • Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

    Unknown

  • Impedance of steels in new and degraded ester based lubricating oil

    Kerry N. Allahar;Darryl P. Butt;Mark E. Orazem;Herbert A. Chin

  • Impedance Analysis of Electrochemical Systems.

    Unknown

  • Dielectric Properties of Materials Showing Constant-Phase-Element (CPE) Impedance Response

    Mark E. Orazem;Isabelle Frateur;Bernard Tribollet;Vincent Vivier

  • Enhanced Graphical Representation of Electrochemical Impedance Data

    Mark E. Orazem;Nadine Pébère;Bernard Tribollet

  • Constant-Phase-Element Behavior Caused by Resistivity Distributions in Films I. Theory

    Bryan Hirschorn;Mark E. Orazem;Bernard Tribollet;Vincent Vivier

  • Measurement Models for Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy I . Demonstration of Applicability

    Pankaj Agarwal;Mark E. Orazem;Luis H. Garcia‐Rubio

  • Constant-Phase-Element Behavior Caused by Resistivity Distributions in Films II. Applications

    Bryan Hirschorn;Mark E. Orazem;Bernard Tribollet;Vincent Vivier

  • Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

    Unknown

  • Application of Measurement Models to Impedance Spectroscopy III . Evaluation of Consistency with the Kramers‐Kronig Relations

    Pankaj Agarwal;Mark E. Orazem;Luis H. Garcia‐Rubio

  • The Apparent Constant-Phase-Element Behavior of a Disk Electrode with Faradaic Reactions A Global and Local Impedance Analysis

    Vicky Mei-Wen Huang;Vincent Vivier;Mark E. Orazem;Nadine Pébère

  • Comparison of different methods for measuring the passive film thickness on metals

    Marie Benoit;Christian Bataillon;Benoit Gwinner;Frédéric Miserque

  • Local electrochemical impedance spectroscopy: A review and some recent developments

    Vicky MeiWen Huang;Shao-Ling Wu;Mark E. Orazem;Nadine Pébère

  • The Apparent Constant-Phase-Element Behavior of an Ideally Polarized Blocking Electrode: A Global and Local Impedance Analysis

    Vicky Mei-Wen Huang;Vincent Vivier;Mark E. Orazem;Nadine Pébère

  • Interpretation of Low-Frequency Inductive Loops in PEM Fuel Cells

    Sunil K. Roy;Mark E. Orazem;Bernard Tribollet

  • Corrosion of Tungsten Microelectrodes used in Neural Recording Applications

    Erin Patrick;Mark E. Orazem;Justin C. Sanchez;Toshikazu Nishida

  • Application of Measurement Models to Impedance Spectroscopy II . Determination of the Stochastic Contribution to the Error Structure

    Pankaj Agarwal;Oscar D. Crisalle;Mark E. Orazem;Luis H. Garcia‐Rubio

  • Constant-phase-element behavior caused by inhomogeneous water uptake in anti-corrosion coatings

    Sylvain Amand;Marco Musiani;Mark E. Orazem;Nadine Pébère

  • The Global and Local Impedance Response of a Blocking Disk Electrode with Local Constant-Phase-Element Behavior

    Vicky Mei-Wen Huang;Vincent Vivier;Isabelle Frateur;Mark E. Orazem

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernard Tribollet
Bernard Tribollet Sorbonne University
Vincent Vivier
Vincent Vivier Sorbonne University
Nadine Pébère
Nadine Pébère Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Marco Musiani
Marco Musiani National Research Council (CNR)
Saeed Moghaddam
Saeed Moghaddam University of Florida
John Newman
John Newman University of California, Berkeley
Pankaj K. Agarwal
Pankaj K. Agarwal Duke University
Claude Deslouis
Claude Deslouis Université Paris Cité
Toshikazu Nishida
Toshikazu Nishida University of Florida
Kevin S. Jones
Kevin S. Jones University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in expanding your career options after studying Engineering and Technology in the USA, there are a variety of online degrees that can complement your technical background. For those wanting to enhance leadership and analytical skills, pursuing an mba in operations management can open doors to senior roles in manufacturing, supply chain, and project management.

Flexibility in admission requirements is also growing, with options like best online mba programs no gmat making it easier to enroll without standardized test scores. Budget-conscious students can find solid options such as an online mba under $30k, which ensures quality education without a heavy financial burden.

Additionally, the intersection of technology and marketing is a booming field. Consider exploring social media marketing schools to build expertise in digital communication and brand strategy—valuable assets for tech-savvy professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. Orazem

Trending Scientists