World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Grace K. Pavlath

Grace K. Pavlath

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
14201
World Ranking
10765
National Ranking
4676

Grace K. Pavlath publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grace K. Pavlath sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 118 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Grace K. Pavlath D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grace K. Pavlath sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Grace K. Pavlath is affiliated with Emory University in the United States. Their recent research includes contributions to gene therapy approaches targeting neurodegenerative diseases.

One of the notable recent papers authored by Grace K. Pavlath is titled "Abstract 4366785: Efficacy and Safety of a Novel AAV FXN Gene Therapy (SGT-212) for the Treatment of Friedreich's Ataxia", published in 2025 in the journal Circulation. This work focuses on evaluating the therapeutic potential of an adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy aimed at addressing Friedreich's Ataxia, a progressive neurodegenerative disorder.

Their publications have appeared in the venue Circulation, indicating a connection to cardiovascular and systemic physiological research contexts. Grace collaborates frequently with a range of researchers, including Jamie L. Marshall, Jun Hee Lee, Matthew Harmelink, Gourav Roy Choudhury, and Heather A. Born, each contributing to overlapping scientific inquiries.

  • Circulation

  • Jamie L. Marshall
  • Jun Hee Lee
  • Matthew Harmelink
  • Gourav Roy Choudhury
  • Heather A. Born

Despite the limited number of publications currently available, Grace K. Pavlath's research focus includes gene therapy techniques and methodologies related to rare genetic disorders. Their work may contribute to the broader scientific understanding of safe and effective gene delivery systems.

Best Publications

  • Plasticity of the differentiated state.

    Helen M. Blau;Grace K. Pavlath;Edna C. Hardeman;Choy-Pik Chiu

  • IL-4 Acts as a Myoblast Recruitment Factor during Mammalian Muscle Growth

    Valerie Horsley;Katie M Jansen;Stephen T Mills;Grace K Pavlath

  • Myoblast fusion: lessons from flies and mice

    Susan M. Abmayr;Grace K. Pavlath

  • Normal dystrophin transcripts detected in Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients after myoblast transplantation.

    Emanuela Gussoni;Grace K. Pavlath;Andrea M. Lanctot;Khema R. Sharma

  • Systemic delivery of human growth hormone by injection of genetically engineered myoblasts.

    Jyotsna Dhawan;Lydia C. Pan;Grace K. Pavlath;Marilyn A. Travis

  • Nfat: ubiquitous regulator of cell differentiation and adaptation

    Valerie Horsley;Grace K. Pavlath

  • Differentially Activated Macrophages Orchestrate Myogenic Precursor Cell Fate During Human Skeletal Muscle Regeneration

    Marielle Saclier;Marielle Saclier;Marielle Saclier;Houda Yacoub‐Youssef;Houda Yacoub‐Youssef;Houda Yacoub‐Youssef;Abigail L. Mackey;Abigail L. Mackey;Ludovic Arnold;Ludovic Arnold

  • The COX-2 pathway is essential during early stages of skeletal muscle regeneration

    Brenda A. Bondesen;Stephen T. Mills;Kristy M. Kegley;Grace K. Pavlath

  • Defective myoblasts identified in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

    Helen M. Blau;Cecelia Webster;Grace K. Pavlath

  • Localization of muscle gene products in nuclear domains

    Grace K. Pavlath;Grace K. Pavlath;Kevin Rich;Kevin Rich;Steven G. Webster;Helen M. Blau

  • Hepatocyte growth factor affects satellite cell activation and differentiation in regenerating skeletal muscle.

    Kristy J. Miller;Deepa Thaloor;Sarah Matteson;Grace K. Pavlath

  • Regulation of the growth of multinucleated muscle cells by an NFATC2-dependent pathway.

    Valerie Horsley;Bret B. Friday;Sarah Matteson;Kristy Miller Kegley

  • Forming a multinucleated cell: molecules that regulate myoblast fusion.

    Valerie Horsley;Grace K. Pavlath

  • Activation and Cellular Localization of the Cyclosporine A-sensitive Transcription Factor NF-AT in Skeletal Muscle Cells

    Karen L. Abbott;Bret B. Friday;Deepa Thaloor;T.J. Murphy

  • Calcineurin activity is required for the initiation of skeletal muscle differentiation.

    Bret B. Friday;Valerie Horsley;Grace K. Pavlath

  • Myoblast implantation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: the San Francisco study.

    R.G. Miller;R.G. Miller;K.R. Sharma;G.K. Pavlath;E. Gussoni

  • Systemic administration of the NF-κB inhibitor curcumin stimulates muscle regeneration after traumatic injury

    Deepa Thaloor;Kristy J. Miller;Jonathan Gephart;Patrick O. Mitchell

  • Isolation of human myoblasts with the fluorescence-activated cell sorter.

    Cecelia Webster;Grace K. Pavlath;David R. Parks;Frank S. Walsh

  • MOR23 promotes muscle regeneration and regulates cell adhesion and migration

    Christine A. Griffin;Kimberly A. Kafadar;Grace K. Pavlath

  • A muscle precursor cell-dependent pathway contributes to muscle growth after atrophy.

    Patrick O. Mitchell;Grace K. Pavlath

Frequent Co-Authors

Helen M. Blau
Helen M. Blau Stanford University
Anita H. Corbett
Anita H. Corbett Emory University
Robert G. Miller
Robert G. Miller California Pacific Medical Center
Thomas A. Rando
Thomas A. Rando Stanford University
Lawrence Steinman
Lawrence Steinman Stanford University
Andrés J. García
Andrés J. García Georgia Institute of Technology
Bénédicte Chazaud
Bénédicte Chazaud Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
Arthur W. English
Arthur W. English Emory University
Jamel Chelly
Jamel Chelly Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology
Frank S. Walsh
Frank S. Walsh Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Biology and Biochemistry, several online degrees and career paths offer exciting professional opportunities. Many graduates explore options in healthcare management, which blends science with leadership roles. Pursuing an affordable online mba healthcare management program can open doors to high-level administrative positions in hospitals, research labs, or pharmaceutical companies.

Another avenue involves medical coding and billing, which are vital for healthcare operations. Understanding the differences between ccs vs cpc certification is important, as each credential impacts your expertise, salary prospects, and job roles within medical records or billing departments.

If you want to know more about career potential, read about medical coding salary expectations, typical job duties, and certification pathways. Healthcare organizations rely on skilled coders to process patient data accurately and efficiently.

Wondering if this path is right for you? Consider the is medical coding a good career assessment for a balanced look at the rewards and challenges in the field. These flexible, online-oriented careers can help biology and biochemistry graduates build a diverse and fulfilling future.

Best Scientists Citing Grace K. Pavlath

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles