World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
9709
World Ranking
6886
National Ranking
327

Franz J. Neyer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franz J. Neyer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 166 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Franz J. Neyer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franz J. Neyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Social network changes and life events across the life span: a meta-analysis.

    Cornelia Wrzus;Martha Hänel;Jenny Wagner;Franz J. Neyer

  • A Gentle Introduction to Bayesian Analysis: Applications to Developmental Research

    Rens van de Schoot;Rens van de Schoot;David Kaplan;Jaap J.A. Denissen;Jens B. Asendorpf

  • Personality-Relationship transaction in young adulthood.

    Franz J. Neyer;Jens B. Asendorpf

  • Do we become a different person when hitting the road? Personality development of sojourners.

    Julia Zimmermann;Franz J. Neyer

  • Psychologie der Beziehung

    Jens B. Asendorpf;Rainer Banse;Franz J. Neyer

  • Relationships matter in personality development: evidence from an 8-year longitudinal study across young adulthood.

    Franz J. Neyer;Judith Lehnart

  • The Stability and Change of Loneliness Across the Life Span: A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies:

    Marcus Mund;Maren M. Freuding;Kathrin Möbius;Nicole Horn

  • Entwicklung und Validierung einer Kurzskala zur Erfassung von Technikbereitschaft

    Franz J. Neyer;Juliane Felber;Claudia Gebhardt

  • Blood is thicker than water: kinship orientation across adulthood.

    Franz Josef Neyer;Frieder R. Lang

  • How Peers Make a Difference: The Role of Peer Groups and Peer Relationships in Personality Development:

    Anne K. Reitz;Anne K. Reitz;Julia Zimmermann;Roos Hutteman;Roos Hutteman;Jule Specht

  • Long-Term Effects of Social Investment: The Case of Partnering in Young Adulthood

    Judith Lehnart;Franz J. Neyer;Jacquelynne Eccles

  • Treating personality-relationship transactions with respect: narrow facets, advanced models, and extended time frames.

    Marcus Mund;Franz J. Neyer

  • Personality‐Relationship Transactions Revisited

    Franz J. Neyer;Marcus Mund;Julia Zimmermann;Cornelia Wrzus

  • Should i stay or should i go? Attachment and personality in stable and instable romantic relationships:

    Judith Lehnart;Franz J. Neyer

  • Patterns and Sources of Personality Development in Old Age

    Christian Kandler;Anna Elena Kornadt;Birk Hagemeyer;Franz J. Neyer

  • Personality and Social Network Effects on Romantic Relationships: A Dyadic Approach

    Franz J. Neyer;Daniel Voigt

  • The German Family Panel (pairfam)

    Josef Brüderl;Karsten Hank;Johannes Huinink;Bernhard Nauck

  • Twin relationship in old age: A developmental perspective

    Franz Josef Neyer

  • Psychologie der Persönlichkeit

    Unknown

  • Beziehungsspezifische Bindungsskalen für Erwachsene und ihre Validierung durch Netzwerk- und Tagebuchverfahren

    Jens B. Asendorpf;Rainer Banse;Susanne Wilpers;Franz J. Neyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Frieder R. Lang
Frieder R. Lang University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Jens B. Asendorpf
Jens B. Asendorpf Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Cornelia Wrzus
Cornelia Wrzus Heidelberg University
Frank M. Spinath
Frank M. Spinath Saarland University
Peter Noack
Peter Noack Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Rainer Banse
Rainer Banse University of Bonn
Karsten Hank
Karsten Hank University of Cologne
Christian Kandler
Christian Kandler University of Bremen
Rens van de Schoot
Rens van de Schoot Utrecht University
Lars Wolf
Lars Wolf Technische Universität Braunschweig

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Franz J. Neyer

Recently Published Articles