World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jochen E. Gebauer

Jochen E. Gebauer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8552 7986 396 389 80 6620

Jochen E. Gebauer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jochen E. Gebauer between 2006 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jochen E. Gebauer published across 19 years, from 2006 to 2024, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2021. 8 of the 89 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2021. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 5 publications
2006 2024

89 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jochen E. Gebauer: publications per year, 2006 to 2024
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 1
2008 4
2009 1
2010 2
2011 5
2012 6
2013 10
2014 4
2015 4
2016 6
2017 2
2018 6
2019 7
2020 6
2021 13
2022 2
2023 3
2024 5
Total 89
Download as CSV

Jochen E. Gebauer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jochen E. Gebauer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 80
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jochen E. Gebauer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jochen E. Gebauer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jochen E. Gebauer is affiliated with the University of Mannheim in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with significant contributions to subfields such as Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Health, and Economics and Econometrics.

Their work extensively covers main topics including Cultural Differences and Values, Personality Traits and Psychology, Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Religion and Society Interactions, Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction, and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology.

Gebauer's frequent coauthors include Wiebke Bleidorn, Peter J. Rentfrow, Samuel D. Gosling, Jeff Potter, and Theresa M. Entringer, reflecting ongoing collaborative research efforts in their areas of study.

Publication venues where Gebauer's research appears most frequently include:

  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Journal of Personality
  • Assessment
  • Current Opinion in Psychology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Notable recent papers by Gebauer include:

  • Country-level correlates of the Dark Triad traits in 49 countries, 2020, Journal of Personality
  • Religious people only live longer in religious cultural contexts: A gravestone analysis., 2020, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Structure of Dark Triad Dirty Dozen Across Eight World Regions, 2020, Assessment
  • Are Regional Differences in Psychological Characteristics and Their Correlates Robust? Applying Spatial-Analysis Techniques to Examine Regional Variation in Personality, 2021, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • The impact of childhood lead exposure on adult personality: Evidence from the United States, Europe, and a large-scale natural experiment, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Best Publications

  • Age and Gender Differences in Self-Esteem—A Cross-Cultural Window

    Wiebke Bleidorn;Ruben C. Arslan;Jaap J. A. Denissen;Peter J. Rentfrow

  • The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding Short Form (BIDR-16):

    Claire M. Hart;Timothy D. Ritchie;Erica G. Hepper;Jochen E. Gebauer

  • Religiosity as Self-Enhancement: A Meta-Analysis of the Relation Between Socially Desirable Responding and Religiosity:

    Constantine Sedikides;Jochen E. Gebauer

  • Communal narcissism.

    Unknown

  • Pancultural Nostalgia: Prototypical Conceptions Across Cultures

    Erica G. Hepper;Tim Wildschut;Constantine Sedikides;Timothy D. Ritchie

  • Religiosity, Social Self-Esteem, and Psychological Adjustment On the Cross-Cultural Specificity of the Psychological Benefits of Religiosity

    Jochen E. Gebauer;Constantine Sedikides;Wiebke Neberich

  • Self-Enhancement and Psychological Adjustment: A Meta-Analytic Review

    Michael Dufner;Jochen E. Gebauer;Constantine Sedikides;Jaap J. A. Denissen

  • Pleasure and pressure based prosocial motivation: Divergent relations to subjective well-being.

    Jochen E. Gebauer;Michael Riketta;Philip Broemer;Gregory R. Maio

  • Agency‐Communion and Self‐Esteem Relations Are Moderated by Culture, Religiosity, Age, and Sex: Evidence for the “Self‐Centrality Breeds Self‐Enhancement” Principle

    Jochen E. Gebauer;Jenny Wagner;Constantine Sedikides;Wiebke Neberich

  • A Three-Tier Hierarchy of Self-Potency: Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self

    Constantine Sedikides;Lowell Gaertner;Michelle A. Luke;Erin M. O’Mara

  • Cross-cultural variations in Big Five relationships with religiosity : A sociocultural motives perspective

    Jochen E. Gebauer;Wiebke Bleidorn;Samuel D. Gosling;Peter J. Rentfrow

  • “How much do you like your name?” An implicit measure of global self-esteem

    Jochen E. Gebauer;Michael Riketta;Philip Broemer;Gregory R. Maio

  • Dynamics of Identity: Between Self-Enhancement and Self-Assessment

    Aiden P. Gregg;Constantine Sedikides;Jochen E. Gebauer

  • To Live Among Like-Minded Others: Exploring the Links Between Person-City Personality Fit and Self-Esteem

    Wiebke Bleidorn;Wiebke Bleidorn;Felix D. Schönbrodt;Jochen E. Gebauer;Peter J. Rentfrow

  • Basic human values: inter-value structure in memory

    Ali Pakizeh;Jochen E. Gebauer;Gregory Richard Maio

  • The religiosity as social value hypothesis: A multi-method replication and extension across 65 countries and three levels of spatial aggregation.

    Jochen E Gebauer;Constantine Sedikides;Felix D Schönbrodt;Wiebke Bleidorn

  • Big Two Personality and Religiosity Across Cultures: Communals as Religious Conformists and Agentics as Religious Contrarians

    Jochen E. Gebauer;Delroy L. Paulhus;Wiebke Neberich

  • Cultural Estrangement: The Role of Personal and Societal Value Discrepancies

    Mark M. Bernard;Jochen E. Gebauer;Gregory Richard Maio

  • Country-level correlates of the Dark Triad traits in 49 countries.

    Peter K. Jonason;Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska;Jarosław Piotrowski;Constantine Sedikides

  • Cultural norm fulfillment, interpersonal belonging, or getting ahead? A large-scale cross-cultural test of three perspectives on the function of self-esteem.

    Jochen E. Gebauer;Constantine Sedikides;Jenny Wagner;Wiebke Bleidorn

  • The need to belong can motivate belief in God.

    Jochen E. Gebauer;Gregory Richard Maio

Frequent Co-Authors

Constantine Sedikides
Constantine Sedikides University of Southampton
Samuel D. Gosling
Samuel D. Gosling The University of Texas at Austin
Wiebke Bleidorn
Wiebke Bleidorn University of Zurich
Jeff Potter
Jeff Potter Brown University
Gregory R. Maio
Gregory R. Maio University of Bath
Peter J. Rentfrow
Peter J. Rentfrow University of Cambridge
Geoffrey Haddock
Geoffrey Haddock Cardiff University
Peter K. Jonason
Peter K. Jonason VIZJA University
Jaap J. A. Denissen
Jaap J. A. Denissen Utrecht University
Mark R. Leary
Mark R. Leary Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to a range of rewarding career pathways, especially in mental health counseling. Online degrees have made it easier than ever for students to start their journey in this field, offering flexibility and access to accredited programs across the country.

When considering a counseling career, it’s important to understand local licensing and educational requirements, as these can vary significantly by location. For example, those interested in working on the West Coast can review the mental health counselor requirements in Seattle or learn how to become a mental health counselor in Spokane. For students in the Midwest or Southeast, resources covering St. Louis mental health counselor certification requirements and St. Petersburg mental health counselor certification requirements detail the necessary steps.

Many psychology graduates go on to earn advanced credentials, specializing in areas such as school counseling, addiction counseling, or clinical psychology. No matter your location, researching your region’s specific prerequisites ensures you are prepared for a successful career in mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Jochen E. Gebauer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles