World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
12962
World Ranking
7718
National Ranking
4138

Mark D. Alicke publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Alicke sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark D. Alicke D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Alicke sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark D. Alicke is affiliated with Ohio University in the United States. Their research intersects multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on psychology, neuroscience, and social sciences, with particular attention to cognitive neuroscience and social psychology subfields.

The researcher has contributed notably to the study of social and intergroup psychology, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, and cultural differences and values. Additional topics in their work include free will and agency, deception detection and forensic psychology, personality traits, and crime patterns and interventions.

Mark D. Alicke has recent publications that demonstrate engagement with these themes. These include:

  • "My True Self is Better Than Yours: Comparative Bias in True Self Judgments" (2020), published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • "The Reasonable Person Standard: Psychological and Legal Perspectives" (2021), published in Annual Review of Law and Social Science
  • "Self-Awareness and Self-Knowledge" (2020), published in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology
  • "The reasonably prudent person, or me?" (2020), published in Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • "Explaining the better-than-average effect among prisoners" (2020), published in Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Mark D. Alicke include Yiyue Zhang, Constantine Sedikides, Nicole Stephenson, Stephanie H. Weigel, and John J. Skowronski.

Their work is often published in venues such as the Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology, and the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Best Publications

  • Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives.

    Mark D. Alicke

  • Culpable control and the psychology of blame.

    Mark D. Alicke

  • Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect.

    Mark D. Alicke;M. L. Klotz;David L. Breitenbecher;Tricia J. Yurak

  • Self-enhancement and self-protection: what they are and what they do

    Mark D. Alicke;Constantine Sedikides

  • Effectiveness of psychotherapy with children and adolescents: a meta-analysis for clinicians

    John R. Weisz;Bahr Weiss;Mark D. Alicke;M. L. Klotz

  • The Better-Than-Average Effect.

    Mark D. Alicke;Olesya Govorun

  • The better-than-average effect in comparative self-evaluation: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.

    Ethan Zell;Jason E Strickhouser;Constantine Sedikides;Mark D Alicke

  • Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection

    Mark D. Alicke;Constantine Sedikides

  • The Local Dominance Effect in Self-Evaluation: Evidence and Explanations

    Ethan Zell;Mark D. Alicke

  • Complaining Behavior in Social Interaction

    Mark D. Alicke;James C. Braun;Jeffrey E. Glor;M. L. Klotz

  • Causation, Norm violation, and culpable control

    Mark D. Alicke;David Rose;Dori Bloom

  • Culpable Control and Counterfactual Reasoning in the Psychology of Blame

    Mark D. Alicke;Justin Buckingham;Ethan Zell;Teresa Davis

  • Self-Enhancement and Self-Protection Motives

    Constantine Sedikides;Mark D. Alicke

  • The person who outperforms me is a genius : Maintaining perceived competence in upward social comparison

    Mark D. Alicke;Frank M. LoSchiavo;Jennifer Zerbst;Shaobo Zhang

  • Deconstructing the better-than-average effect.

    Corey L. Guenther;Mark D. Alicke

  • The Self in Social Judgment

    Mark D. Alicke;David A. Dunning;Joachim I. Krueger

  • Conformity and Group Size: The Concern with Being Right and the Concern with Being Liked

    Chester A. Insko;Richard H. Smith;Mark D. Alicke;Joel Wade

  • Judgments of Physical Attractiveness: The Role of Faces and Bodies

    Mark D. Alicke;Richard H. Smith;M. L. Klotz

  • The influence of individual versus aggregate social comparison and the presence of others on self-evaluations.

    Justin T. Buckingham;Mark D. Alicke

  • Self-Evaluative Effects of Temporal and Social Comparison

    Ethan Zell;Mark D. Alicke

  • Contextual neglect, self-evaluation, and the frog-pond effect.

    Ethan Zell;Mark D. Alicke

Frequent Co-Authors

Constantine Sedikides
Constantine Sedikides University of Southampton
Chester A. Insko
Chester A. Insko University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Bahr Weiss
Bahr Weiss Vanderbilt University
Joachim I. Krueger
Joachim I. Krueger Brown University
John J. Skowronski
John J. Skowronski Northern Illinois University
David Dunning
David Dunning University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David A. Lagnado
David A. Lagnado University College London
John R. Weisz
John R. Weisz Harvard University
Denis J. Hilton
Denis J. Hilton Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Psychology in the USA, exploring related online degrees can expand your career options. Many students interested in psychology pursue careers in social work, counseling, or mental health services. Universities across the country offer online programs that qualify graduates for key roles—however, degree requirements for becoming a social worker differ depending on the state.

For example, the New Mexico minimum degree requirement for social workers is a bachelor’s degree in social work (BSW), while some states require a Master of Social Work (MSW). In New York, state boards outline specific social worker degree requirements in New York that involve both education and licensure.

Similarly, North Carolina minimum degree requirement for social workers and the North Dakota minimum degree requirement for social workers highlight the importance of accredited degrees and supervised clinical experience. Researching your state’s requirements before starting an online degree is essential for a successful pathway from psychology studies into a professional role in social work or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Mark D. Alicke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles