World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
4720
World Ranking
9914
National Ranking
5231

Martin A. Safer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin A. Safer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 75 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Martin A. Safer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin A. Safer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin A. Safer is affiliated with the Catholic University of America in the United States. Their professional profile shows no recorded recent papers, frequent co-authors, main or subfields of study, nor any specific topics of research, indicating limited publicly available details on research output or collaborative networks.

There are no publications listed under recent papers, so no information about the year of publication, titles, or publication venues is available.

Similarly, no frequent publication venues or book publishers are provided, suggesting either a lack of focus on particular journals or houses or that such data has not been documented in accessible indexes.

There are no notable awards or distinctions recorded for this researcher, meaning there are no known publicly documented formal recognitions to date.

This profile is constructed based on available data reflecting only affiliation without further detail on scholarly contributions, which may reflect limited indexing or the nature of their academic role.

Best Publications

  • Determinants of Three Stages of Delay in Seeking Care at a Medical Clinic

    Martin A. Safer;Quincy J. Tharps;Thomas C. Jackson;Howard Leventhal

  • The Impact of Communications on the Self-Regulation of Health Beliefs, Decisions, and Behavior:

    Howard Leventhal;Martin A. Safer;Daphne M. Panagis

  • Sources of Bias in Memory for Emotions

    Linda J. Levine;Martin A. Safer

  • Ear differences in evaluating emotional tones of voice and verbal content.

    Martin A. Safer;Howard Leventhal

  • Tunnel memory for traumatic events

    Martin A. Safer;Sven-Åke Christianson;Marguerite W. Autry;Karin Österlund

  • Emotional events and emotions in autobiographical memories

    Sven-Åke Christianson;Martin A. Safer

  • Sex and hemisphere differences in access to codes for processing emotional expressions and faces.

    Martin A. Safer

  • Functions of remembering and misremembering emotion

    Linda J. Levine;Heather C. Lench;Martin A. Safer

  • Distortion in Memory for Emotions: The Contributions of Personality and Post-Event Knowledge

    Martin A. Safer;Linda J. Levine;Amy L. Drapalski

  • Effects of present pain level on recall of chronic pain and medication use

    Wendy B. Smith;Martin A. Safer

  • What US judges know and believe about eyewitness testimony

    Richard A. Wise;Martin A. Safer

  • Eyewitnesses show hypermnesia for details about a violent event.

    Ellen Scrivner;Martin A. Safer

  • The Protective Value of Hardiness on Military Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms

    Sandra M Escolas;Barbara L Pitts;Martin A Safer;Paul T Bartone

  • "It was never that bad": Biased recall of grief and long-term adjustment to the death of a spouse

    Martin A. Safer;George A. Bonanno;Nigel P. Field

  • Accuracy and artifact: reexamining the intensity bias in affective forecasting.

    Linda J. Levine;Heather C. Lench;Robin L. Kaplan;Martin A. Safer

  • The meaning of pain: cancer patients' rating and recall of pain intensity and affect

    Wendy B Smith;Richard H Gracely;Martin A Safer

  • The impact of rock videos and music with suicidal content on thoughts and attitudes about suicide.

    Robin A. Rustad;Jacob E. Small;David A. Jobes;Martin A. Safer

  • Individual differences in misremembering pre-psychotherapy distress: personality and memory distortion.

    Martin A. Safer;David J. Keuler

  • Remembering and Misremembering Emotions.

    Linda J. Levine;Martin A. Safer;Heather C. Lench

  • What US prosecutors and defence attorneys know and believe about eyewitness testimony

    Richard A. Wise;Nell B. Pawlenko;Martin A. Safer;David Meyer

  • “Accuracy and artifact: Reexamining the intensity bias in affective forecasting”: Correction to Levine et al. (2012).

    Linda J. Levine;Heather C. Lench;Robin L. Kaplan;Martin A. Safer

  • The meaning of pain: cancer patients' rating and recall of pain intensity and affect.

    Simon S. Smith;R Gracely;M Safer

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda J. Levine
Linda J. Levine University of California, Irvine
Heather C. Lench
Heather C. Lench Texas A&M University
Howard Leventhal
Howard Leventhal Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Svein Magnussen
Svein Magnussen University of Oslo
David A. Jobes
David A. Jobes Catholic University of America
Giuseppe Sartori
Giuseppe Sartori University of Padua
Richard H. Gracely
Richard H. Gracely University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Rick S. Zimmerman
Rick S. Zimmerman Wayne State University
Nigel P. Field
Nigel P. Field Palo Alto University
George A. Bonanno
George A. Bonanno Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens the door to a variety of fulfilling online degrees and career pathways, especially within fields like social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many learners pursue online programs for the flexibility they offer, making it easier to balance studies with other responsibilities.

If you’re considering social work, be aware that degree requirements can differ depending on your state. For instance, you can find detailed state-specific guidance about social worker degree requirements in South Carolina and the South Dakota minimum degree requirement for social workers. Similarly, you can review the Tennessee education requirements for social workers and the degree needed to be a social worker in Texas.

Completing an online psychology or social work degree can set you on the path to rewarding roles in clinical environments, schools, or community organizations. As you research programs, always check state regulations to ensure your degree meets licensing requirements—this way, you’re fully prepared for your chosen career.

Best Scientists Citing Martin A. Safer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles