World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Law 34 169 150 127 113 208 9886

Malcolm M Feeley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Malcolm M Feeley between 1968 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Malcolm M Feeley published across 58 years, from 1968 to 2025, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2001. 3 of the 212 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2001. 1968: 2 publications 1969: 3 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 5 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 2 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 7 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 4 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1968 2025

212 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Malcolm M Feeley: publications per year, 1968 to 2025
Year Publications
1968 2
1969 3
1970 2
1971 1
1972 0
1973 5
1974 2
1975 1
1976 2
1977 4
1978 4
1979 7
1980 4
1981 4
1982 6
1983 3
1984 1
1985 4
1986 0
1987 3
1988 2
1989 5
1990 4
1991 7
1992 8
1993 1
1994 4
1995 2
1996 4
1997 2
1998 3
1999 2
2000 3
2001 13
2002 8
2003 6
2004 5
2005 5
2006 4
2007 7
2008 12
2009 3
2010 5
2011 3
2012 8
2013 6
2014 4
2015 2
2016 4
2017 1
2018 3
2019 1
2020 2
2021 1
2022 1
2023 0
2024 2
2025 1
Total 212
Download as CSV

Malcolm M Feeley publications per year - data summary

  • Malcolm M Feeley, a Law scholar from University of California, Berkeley, has 212 publications recorded across 58 years, from 1968 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1968 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2001, with 13 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1971, 1975, 1984, 1993 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 58 years in the span carry no publications at all (1972, 1986 and 2023).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.9 per year counting only the 55 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 5 publications, 2% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1968-1987: 58 publications (2.9 per year); 1988-2007: 95 publications (4.8 per year); 2008-2025: 59 publications (3.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Malcolm M Feeley publication distribution in Law in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Law in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm M Feeley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 46 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 262+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 262+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 262 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 207–211 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 3 scientists 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 0 scientists 52–56 publications: 3 scientists 57–61 publications: 2 scientists 62–66 publications: 1 scientist 67–71 publications: 6 scientists 72–76 publications: 6 scientists 77–81 publications: 10 scientists 82–86 publications: 7 scientists 87–91 publications: 10 scientists 92–96 publications: 18 scientists 97–101 publications: 15 scientists 102–106 publications: 14 scientists 107–111 publications: 12 scientists 112–116 publications: 12 scientists 117–121 publications: 14 scientists 122–126 publications: 10 scientists 127–131 publications: 9 scientists 132–136 publications: 14 scientists 137–141 publications: 12 scientists 142–146 publications: 14 scientists 147–151 publications: 8 scientists 152–156 publications: 14 scientists 157–161 publications: 5 scientists 162–166 publications: 9 scientists 167–171 publications: 15 scientists 172–176 publications: 6 scientists 177–181 publications: 9 scientists 182–186 publications: 8 scientists 187–191 publications: 16 scientists 192–196 publications: 7 scientists 197–201 publications: 6 scientists 202–206 publications: 7 scientists 207–211 publications: 11 scientists 212–216 publications: 0 scientists 217–221 publications: 5 scientists 222–226 publications: 6 scientists 227–231 publications: 10 scientists 232–236 publications: 8 scientists 237–241 publications: 5 scientists 242–246 publications: 4 scientists 247–251 publications: 2 scientists 252–256 publications: 7 scientists 257–261 publications: 5 scientists 262+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 262+

This scientist: 208 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 262 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Law scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 466 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 3
42–46 1
47–51 0
52–56 3
57–61 2
62–66 1
67–71 6
72–76 6
77–81 10
82–86 7
87–91 10
92–96 18
97–101 15
102–106 14
107–111 12
112–116 12
117–121 14
122–126 10
127–131 9
132–136 14
137–141 12
142–146 14
147–151 8
152–156 14
157–161 5
162–166 9
167–171 15
172–176 6
177–181 9
182–186 8
187–191 16
192–196 7
197–201 6
202–206 7
207–211 11 208
212–216 0
217–221 5
222–226 6
227–231 10
232–236 8
237–241 5
242–246 4
247–251 2
252–256 7
257–261 5
262+ 100
Download as CSV

Malcolm M Feeley publication distribution in Law in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 466 Law scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 46 ranges running from 37–41 to 262+ publications.
  • Malcolm M Feeley, a Law scholar from University of California, Berkeley, records 208 publications - the 66th percentile of the discipline.
  • 66% of ranked Law scientists score the same or lower than Malcolm M Feeley, and about 34% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 167–171 publications range, and Malcolm M Feeley ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 262+ publications, holding 100 scientists (21% of the field).
  • 14% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 92–96 publications), so the field is spread fairly evenly across the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 262 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (21% of the field).

Malcolm M Feeley D-index placement in Law in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Law scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm M Feeley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 23 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 42+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 92. Most scientists, 92, have 42+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 42 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 16 scientists 21 D-Index: 23 scientists 22 D-Index: 11 scientists 23 D-Index: 20 scientists 24 D-Index: 17 scientists 25 D-Index: 23 scientists 26 D-Index: 19 scientists 27 D-Index: 19 scientists 28 D-Index: 22 scientists 29 D-Index: 14 scientists 30 D-Index: 25 scientists 31 D-Index: 25 scientists 32 D-Index: 20 scientists 33 D-Index: 24 scientists 34 D-Index: 23 scientists 35 D-Index: 12 scientists 36 D-Index: 11 scientists 37 D-Index: 15 scientists 38 D-Index: 14 scientists 39 D-Index: 4 scientists 40 D-Index: 8 scientists 41 D-Index: 9 scientists 42+ D-Index: 92 scientists
20 D-Index 42+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 42 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Law scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 466 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 16
21 23
22 11
23 20
24 17
25 23
26 19
27 19
28 22
29 14
30 25
31 25
32 20
33 24
34 23 34
35 12
36 11
37 15
38 14
39 4
40 8
41 9
42+ 92
Download as CSV

Malcolm M Feeley D-index placement in Law in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 466 Law scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 23 ranges running from 20 to 42+ D-Index.
  • Malcolm M Feeley, a Law scholar from University of California, Berkeley, records 34 D-Index - the 65th percentile of the discipline.
  • 65% of ranked Law scientists score the same or lower than Malcolm M Feeley, and about 35% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 31 D-Index range, and Malcolm M Feeley ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42+ D-Index, holding 92 scientists (20% of the field).
  • 24% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 25 D-Index), so the field is spread fairly evenly across the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 42 D-Index or more, 92 scientists in all (20% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Malcolm M Feeley is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their scholarly work primarily spans the social sciences, with a focus on law, political science and international relations, cognitive neuroscience, economics and econometrics, and sociology and political science.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Criminal Law and Evidence
  • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Free Will and Agency
  • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • American Constitutional Law and Politics
  • Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems

Malcolm M Feeley has published frequently in several academic venues, including:

  • Law & Society Review
  • New Criminal Law Review
  • Public Choice
  • Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies

Recent papers authored by Feeley cover a range of topics related to criminal justice and constitutionalism. These publications include:

  • "Criminal Justice as Regulation," 2020, New Criminal Law Review
  • "Privilege and punishment: How race and class matter in criminal court. By Matthew Clair. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020. 320 pp. $19.95 paperback," 2022, Law & Society Review
  • "Prisoners of Politics: Breaking the Cycle of Mass Incarceration. By Rachel Elise Barkow. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 2019. 291 pp. $35.00 hardcover," 2020, Law & Society Review
  • "David Skarbek: The puzzle of prison order: why life behind bars varies around the world. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 2020, xiii + 240 pp, USD 27.95 (paperback)," 2021, Public Choice
  • "Introduction to the Symposium on Nicholas Barber, The Principles of Constitutionalism," 2021, Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies

Feeley's collaboration record includes work with Rosann Greenspan.

In 2020, Malcolm M Feeley was named a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Best Publications

  • The New Penology : Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications

    Malcolm M. Feeley;Jonathan Simon

  • Federalism: Some Notes on a National Neurosis

    Edward L. Rubin;Malcolm Feeley

  • Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America's Prisons

    Malcolm Feeley;Edward L. Rubin

  • The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court

    Malcolm M. Feeley

  • Economic Analysis of Law

    Malcolm Feeley;Richard A. Posner

  • Fighting for political freedom : comparative studies of the legal complex and political liberalism

    Malcolm M Feeley;Terry Halliday;Lucien Karpik

  • True Crime: The New Penology and Public Discourse on Crime

    Malcolm M Feeley;Jonathan Simon

  • The Process is the Punishment

    Paul Wiles;Malcolm M. Feeley

  • Two Models of the Criminal Justice System: An Organizational Perspective

    Malcolm M. Feeley

  • Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail

    Malcolm M Feeley

  • Federalism: Political Identity and Tragic Compromise

    Malcolm M. Feeley;Edward L. Rubin

  • Entrepreneurs of punishment: The legacy of privatization

    Malcolm M. Feeley

  • 1-1-1972 Two Models of the Criminal Justice System : An Organizational Perspective

    Unknown

  • Hollow Hopes, Flypaper, and Metaphors

    Malcolm M. Feeley

  • The impact of Supreme Court decisions

    Malcolm M Feeley;Theodore L. Becker

  • The Vanishing Female: The Decline of Women in the Criminal Process, 1687-1912

    Malcolm M. Feeley;Deborah L. Little

  • The Legal Complex and Struggles for Political Liberalism

    Terry Halliday;Lucien Karpik;Malcolm Feeley

  • Legality, Social Research, and the Challenge of Institutional Review Boards

    Malcolm M. Feeley

  • The Form and Limits of the New Penology

    Malcolm M Feeley;Jonathan Simon

  • Fates of Political Liberalism in the British Post-Colony: The Politics Of The Legal Complex

    Terence C. Halliday;Lucien Karpik;Malcolm M. Feeley

  • Book Review: Crime, social order and the rise of neo-Conservative politics

    Malcolm M. Feeley

  • THE CONCEPT OF LAWS IN SOCIAL SCIENCE : A CRITIQUE AND NOTES ON AN EXPANDED VIEW *

    Unknown

  • Urban politics and the criminal courts

    Malcolm M. Feeley;Martin A. Levin

  • The Process is the Punishment

    Malcolm M. Feeley

  • The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court.

    Jean Bickmore White;Malcolm M. Feeley

  • The Policy Dilemma; Federal Crime Policy and the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, 1968-1978

    Robert F. Coulam;Malcolm M. Feeley;Austin D. Sarat

Frequent Co-Authors

Austin Sarat
Austin Sarat Amherst College
Terence C. Halliday
Terence C. Halliday American Bar Foundation
Lee Epstein
Lee Epstein Washington University in St. Louis
Richard A. Posner
Richard A. Posner University of Chicago
Virginia Gray
Virginia Gray University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in law doesn’t have to be limited to traditional legal degrees. Today, online education offers a range of alternative pathways that support legal careers in management, leadership, and business strategy. For instance, pursuing the best online master's in organizational leadership can help you develop skills in strategic decision-making and ethical leadership—qualities highly valued in legal contexts.

If you’re interested in the operations side of legal practice, an online mba in operations management covers topics like supply chain, project management, and organizational efficiency. Many professionals aiming for legal roles in business or consulting also look for flexible educational opportunities, making an online mba without gmat requirements especially attractive.

Cost is another vital consideration. Students frequently seek out high-quality programs that remain affordable, such as an online mba under $30k. By combining legal studies with business, management, or leadership degrees, you can create a diverse and rewarding career path in law or related sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Malcolm M Feeley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles