World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
65637
World Ranking
9062
National Ranking
4674

Joyce O'Shaughnessy publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joyce O'Shaughnessy sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 751 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Joyce O'Shaughnessy D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joyce O'Shaughnessy sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joyce O'Shaughnessy is affiliated with Baylor University Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a focus on Oncology and several related subfields, including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Genetics.

Their work covers a range of topics in cancer research, emphasizing:

  • Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways

Frequent publication venues for Joyce O'Shaughnessy include:

  • Cancer Research
  • Annals of Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • New England Journal of Medicine

They have collaborated extensively with co-authors such as Hope S. Rugo, Javier Cortés, Nadia Harbeck, Sara M. Tolaney, and Sara A. Hurvitz, with collaboration counts ranging from 23 to 36 joint works.

Recent notable publications include:

  • Pembrolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Sacituzumab Govitecan in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Primary results from IMpassion131, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase III trial of first-line paclitaxel with or without atezolizumab for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, 2021, Annals of Oncology
  • Sacituzumab govitecan, a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, for patients with epithelial cancer: final safety and efficacy results from the phase I/II IMMU-132-01 basket trial, 2021, Annals of Oncology
  • Overall Survival with Pembrolizumab in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer, 2024, New England Journal of Medicine

Their publications have attracted significant citations, indicating the impact and reach of their recent work in the oncology and breast cancer research communities.

Best Publications

  • Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials

    O. Abe;R. Abe;K. Enomoto;K. Kikuchi

  • Phase III Trial of Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel Compared With Polyethylated Castor Oil–Based Paclitaxel in Women With Breast Cancer

    William J. Gradishar;Sergei Tjulandin;Neville Davidson;Heather Shaw

  • Pembrolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

    Peter Schmid;Javier Cortes;Lajos Pusztai;Heather McArthur

  • Ribociclib as First-Line Therapy for HR-Positive, Advanced Breast Cancer

    Gabriel N. Hortobagyi;Salomon M. Stemmer;Howard A. Burris;Yoon-Sim Yap

  • RIBBON-1: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab for First-Line Treatment of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative, Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer

    Nicholas J. Robert;Véronique Diéras;John Glaspy;Adam M. Brufsky

  • Sacituzumab Govitecan in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

    Aditya Bardia;Sara A Hurvitz;Sara M Tolaney;Delphine Loirat

  • Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): A phase 3 open-label randomised study

    Javier Cortes;Joyce O'Shaughnessy;David Loesch;Joanne J.L. Blum

  • Randomized Study of Lapatinib Alone or in Combination With Trastuzumab in Women With ErbB2-Positive, Trastuzumab-Refractory Metastatic Breast Cancer

    Kimberly L. Blackwell;Harold J. Burstein;Anna Maria Storniolo;Hope Rugo

  • Phase II Study of the Antibody Drug Conjugate Trastuzumab-DM1 for the Treatment of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) –Positive Breast Cancer After Prior HER2-Directed Therapy

    Howard A. Burris;Hope S. Rugo;Svetislava J. Vukelja;Charles L. Vogel

  • Sacituzumab Govitecan-hziy in Refractory Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

    Aditya Bardia;Ingrid A Mayer;Linda T Vahdat;Sara M Tolaney

  • Progress and Promise of FDG-PET Imaging for Cancer Patient Management and Oncologic Drug Development

    Gary J. Kelloff;John M. Hoffman;Bruce Johnson;Howard I. Scher

  • The Global Breast Cancer Burden: Variations in Epidemiology and Survival

    Gabriel N. Hortobagyi;Jaime de la Garza Salazar;Kathleen Pritchard;Dino Amadori

  • Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase III trial of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

    Gabriel N. Hortobagyi;Salomon M. Stemmer;Howard A. Burris;Yoon-Sim Yap

  • Addition of the PARP inhibitor veliparib plus carboplatin or carboplatin alone to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (BrighTNess): a randomised, phase 3 trial

    Sibylle Loibl;Joyce O'Shaughnessy;Michael Untch;William M Sikov

  • Detection of Chromosomal Alterations in the Circulation of Cancer Patients with Whole-Genome Sequencing

    Rebecca J. Leary;Mark Sausen;Isaac Kinde;Nickolas Papadopoulos

  • Blinded, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Single Administration Pegfilgrastim Once per Cycle Versus Daily Filgrastim as an Adjunct to Chemotherapy in Patients With High-Risk Stage II or Stage III/IV Breast Cancer

    F.A. Holmes;J.A. O’Shaughnessy;S. Vukelja;S.E. Jones

  • Overall Survival Benefit With Lapatinib in Combination With Trastuzumab for Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Final Results From the EGF104900 Study

    Kimberly L. Blackwell;Harold J. Burstein;Anna Maria Storniolo;Hope S. Rugo

  • Phase III Trial Comparing Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide With Docetaxel Plus Cyclophosphamide As Adjuvant Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer

    Stephen E. Jones;Michael A. Savin;Frankie Ann Holmes;Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy

  • A Genomic Predictor of Response and Survival Following Taxane-Anthracycline Chemotherapy for Invasive Breast Cancer

    Christos Hatzis;Lajos Pusztai;Vicente Valero;Daniel J. Booser

  • Pembrolizumab monotherapy for previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: cohort A of the phase II KEYNOTE-086 study.

    Sylvia Adams;Peter Schmid;Hope H.S. Rugo;Eric Winer

Frequent Co-Authors

Hope S. Rugo
Hope S. Rugo University of California, San Francisco
Javier Cortes
Javier Cortes Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari
Adam Brufsky
Adam Brufsky University of Pittsburgh
Aditya Bardia
Aditya Bardia Harvard University
Nadia Harbeck
Nadia Harbeck Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Véronique Diéras
Véronique Diéras Institute Curie
Sara A. Hurvitz
Sara A. Hurvitz Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Sara M. Tolaney
Sara M. Tolaney Harvard University
Michael Untch
Michael Untch Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch
Igor Bondarenko
Igor Bondarenko Ministry of Internal Affairs

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The journey to a healthcare career in the USA offers various alternative pathways beyond a traditional MD. Many students consider advanced nursing degrees, especially programs tailored for non-nurses. For those interested in accelerated options, direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online can be an excellent choice, helping you transition into nursing with a master’s degree even if your background isn’t in healthcare.

Admissions requirements vary widely among schools. Some prospective students search for whats the easiest nursing program to get into? to increase their chances of enrolling quickly, especially if they wish to enter the workforce soon. Similarly, students looking to avoid standardized entrance exams can explore institutions listed in do all nursing schools require the teas.

For those interested in allied health, medical billing and coding is a fast-growing field that provides remote career opportunities. The best medical billing and coding schools online offer accredited programs, often with financial aid, that make it easier to start a healthcare career from home. These diverse pathways make it possible to find a medical or healthcare career that fits your background and life goals.

Best Scientists Citing Joyce O'Shaughnessy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles