Andrew Mead publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew Mead between 1957 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew Mead published across 69 years, from 1957 to 2025, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2012. 13 of the 196 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications

5 10 15 20 25

1957 2025

196 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table

Andrew Mead: publications per year, 1957 to 2025
Year	Publications
1957	1
1958	0
1959	0
1960	0
1961	0
1962	0
1963	0
1964	0
1965	0
1966	0
1967	0
1968	0
1969	0
1970	0
1971	0
1972	0
1973	0
1974	0
1975	0
1976	0
1977	0
1978	0
1979	0
1980	0
1981	0
1982	0
1983	1
1984	0
1985	0
1986	0
1987	0
1988	0
1989	0
1990	1
1991	2
1992	1
1993	0
1994	1
1995	0
1996	3
1997	0
1998	0
1999	7
2000	4
2001	4
2002	5
2003	10
2004	12
2005	4
2006	5
2007	4
2008	6
2009	4
2010	1
2011	3
2012	27
2013	8
2014	5
2015	4
2016	2
2017	3
2018	2
2019	3
2020	8
2021	12
2022	6
2023	24
2024	10
2025	3
Total	196

Download as CSV

Andrew Mead publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Mead sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists

50 100 150 200 250

36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 118 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table

Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications	Scientists	This scientist
36–40	2
41–45	7
46–50	40
51–55	58
56–60	60
61–65	107
66–70	130
71–75	153
76–80	191
81–85	199
86–90	206
91–95	218
96–100	226
101–105	227
106–110	247
111–115	255
116–120	253	118
121–125	233
126–130	219
131–135	201
136–140	194
141–145	176
146–150	157
151–155	147
156–160	151
161–165	159
166–170	137
171–175	128
176–180	126
181–185	98
186–190	114
191–195	100
196–200	90
201–205	71
206–210	98
211–215	70
216–220	86
221–225	61
226–230	58
231–235	53
236–240	64
241–245	39
246–250	46
251–255	51
256–260	36
261–265	44
266–270	35
271–275	30
276–280	33
281–285	35
286–290	36
291–295	26
296–300	26
301–305	31
306–310	30
311–315	21
316–320	29
321–325	14
326–330	15
331–335	15
336–340	17
341–345	15
346–350	12
351–355	17
356–360	18
361–365	12
366–370	11
371–375	6
376–380	6
381–385	11
386–390	9
391–395	10
396–400	8
401–405	4
406–410	9
411–415	11
416–420	4
421–425	7
426–430	4
431–435	3
436–440	5
441–445	8
446–450	6
451–455	7
456–460	5
461–465	6
466	2
467+	99

Download as CSV

Andrew Mead D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Mead sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists

50 100 150 200 250

30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table

Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index	Scientists	This scientist
30	200
31	236
32	253
33	283
34	288
35	240
36	246
37	243
38	247
39	229
40	232
41	230
42	228
43	219
44	193
45	164
46	158
47	143
48	131
49	127
50	122	50
51	122
52	110
53	102
54	98
55	79
56	85
57	88
58	91
59	62
60	61
61	59
62	54
63	61
64	59
65	58
66	41
67	49
68	39
69	32
70	40
71	47
72	38
73	28
74	29
75	28
76	22
77	21
78	25
79	26
80	19
81	16
82	12
83	16
84	14
85	11
86	17
87	13
88	10
89	12
90	18
91	16
92	16
93	17
94	12
95	8
96	9
97	9
98	11
99	12
100	5
101	8
102	4
103	11
104	5
105	9
106	7
107	4
108	8
109+	99

Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

Botany
Ecology
Gene

His primary scientific interests are in Botany, Shoot, Gene expression profiling, Host and Agar. His Botany study frequently links to related topics such as Nutrient. Andrew Mead has researched Shoot in several fields, including Cultivar, Phylogenetic tree, Phylogenetics, Brassica oleracea and Genetic variation.

In his study, Agronomy is strongly linked to Doubled haploidy, which falls under the umbrella field of Cultivar. His studies in Genetic variation integrate themes in fields like Clade and Biogeochemical cycle. His Gene expression profiling study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Regulation of gene expression, Transcription factor, Computational biology and Gene regulatory network.

His most cited work include:

Phylogenetic Variation in the Silicon Composition of Plants (622 citations)
High-Resolution Temporal Profiling of Transcripts during Arabidopsis Leaf Senescence Reveals a Distinct Chronology of Processes and Regulation (552 citations)
Interactions between selenium and sulphur nutrition in Arabidopsis thaliana (300 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Botany, Agronomy, Horticulture, Ecology and Weed. His research in the fields of Shoot, Germination and Cultivar overlaps with other disciplines such as Agar. His Shoot research incorporates themes from Phylogenetics, Phytoremediation and Phylogenetic tree.

In his work, Fungi imperfecti, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Spore and Predation is strongly intertwined with Biological pest control, which is a subfield of Agronomy. His work on Water quality is typically connected to Resistome, Drainage basin and Integron as part of general Ecology study, connecting several disciplines of science. He interconnects Weed control, Competition and Seedling in the investigation of issues within Weed.

He most often published in these fields:

Botany (26.27%)
Agronomy (25.42%)
Horticulture (15.25%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

Crop (8.47%)
Gene (7.63%)
Cultivar (7.63%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Andrew Mead focuses on Crop, Gene, Cultivar, Veterinary medicine and Agronomy. His Crop research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Aphid, Myzus persicae, Suction trap and Growing season. Aphid is a subfield of Botany that Andrew Mead tackles.

Andrew Mead has included themes like Fusarium and Microbiology in his Gene study. His Cultivar study combines topics in areas such as Pathogen, Fusarium wilt, Fusarium oxysporum, Major gene and Housekeeping gene. His Agronomy research integrates issues from Photosynthesis, RuBisCO and Canopy.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

Phenotyping of field-grown wheat in the UK highlights contribution of light response of photosynthesis and flag leaf longevity to grain yield (74 citations)
A spatial temporal analysis of the Fusarium graminearum transcriptome during symptomless and symptomatic wheat infection. (28 citations)
Towards new sources of resistance to the currant-lettuce aphid (Nasonovia ribisnigri). (9 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

Botany
Ecology
Gene

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Crop, Cultivar, Crop yield, Agronomy and Carriage. The study incorporates disciplines such as Domestication, Aphid, Botany and Expressed sequence tag in addition to Crop. His research in Cultivar intersects with topics in Lactuca and Sequence assembly.

His Crop yield research incorporates elements of Photosynthesis, Climate change, Mean radiant temperature and Fertilizer. His Agronomy research includes elements of Canopy and RuBisCO. MANNHEIMIA HAEMOLYTICA, Colonisation, Pasteurellaceae, Nasal passages and Veterinary medicine are fields of study that intersect with his Carriage research.

Best Publications

Phylogenetic Variation in the Silicon Composition of Plants

M. J. Hodson;Philip J. White;A. Mead;M. R. Broadley

1292
Citations
High-Resolution Temporal Profiling of Transcripts during Arabidopsis Leaf Senescence Reveals a Distinct Chronology of Processes and Regulation

Emily Breeze;Elizabeth Harrison;Stuart McHattie;Linda Karen Hughes

955
Citations
Interactions between selenium and sulphur nutrition in Arabidopsis thaliana

P. J. White;H. C. Bowen;P. Parmaguru;M. Fritz

564
Citations
Arabidopsis Defense against Botrytis cinerea: Chronology and Regulation Deciphered by High-Resolution Temporal Transcriptomic Analysis

Oliver P. Windram;Priyadharshini Madhou;Stuart McHattie;Claire Hill

398
Citations
A virulent strain of deformed wing virus (DWV) of honeybees (Apis mellifera) prevails after Varroa destructor-mediated, or in vitro, transmission.

Eugene V. Ryabov;Graham R. Wood;Jessica M. Fannon;Jonathan D. Moore

384
Citations
Shoot yield drives phosphorus use efficiency in Brassica oleracea and correlates with root architecture traits

John P Hammond;Martin R Broadley;Philip J White;Graham J King

382
Citations
Phylogenetic variation in heavy metal accumulation in angiosperms

Martin R. Broadley;Neil J. Willey;Janine C. Wilkins;Alan J. M. Baker

298
Citations
Phylogenetic variation in the shoot mineral concentration of angiosperms

Martin R. Broadley;Helen C. Bowen;Helen L. Cotterill;John P. Hammond

290
Citations
Contrasting arbuscular mycorrhizal communities colonizing different host plants show a similar response to a soil phosphorus concentration gradient

Paul Gosling;Andrew Mead;Maude Proctor;John P. Hammond

255
Citations
MODELLING THE EMERGENCE RESPONSE OF WEED SEEDS TO BURIAL DEPTH: INTERACTIONS WITH SEED DENSITY, WEIGHT AND SHAPE

A. C. Grundy;A. Mead;S. Burston

223
Citations
A local regulatory network around three NAC transcription factors in stress responses and senescence in Arabidopsis leaves

Richard Hickman;Claire Hill;Christopher A. Penfold;Emily Breeze

222
Citations
Cesium Toxicity in Arabidopsis

Corrina R. Hampton;Helen C. Bowen;Martin R. Broadley;John P. Hammond

218
Citations
Phenotyping of field-grown wheat in the UK highlights contribution of light response of photosynthesis and flag leaf longevity to grain yield.

Elizabete Carmo-Silva;P.J. Andralojc;Joanna C. Scales;Steven M. Driever

212
Citations
Transcriptional Dynamics Driving MAMP-Triggered Immunity and Pathogen Effector-Mediated Immunosuppression in Arabidopsis Leaves Following Infection with Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000

Laura A. Lewis;Krzysztof Polanski;Marta de Torres-Zabala;Siddharth Jayaraman

194
Citations
Variation in the shoot calcium content of angiosperms

Martin R. Broadley;Helen C. Bowen;Helen L. Cotterill;John P. Hammond

184
Citations
Temperature, light and nitrate sensing coordinate Arabidopsis seed dormancy cycling resulting in winter and summer annual phenotypes

Steven Footitt;Ziyue Huang;Heather A. Clay;Andrew Mead

176
Citations
Shoot Calcium and Magnesium Concentrations Differ between Subtaxa, Are Highly Heritable, and Associate with Potentially Pleiotropic Loci in Brassica oleracea

Martin R. Broadley;John P. Hammond;Graham J. King;Dave Astley

168
Citations
Field studies on the biofumigation of take-all by Brassica break crops

J. A. Kirkegaard;M. Sarwar;P. T. W. Wong;A. Mead

164
Citations
A method to assess taxonomic variation in shoot caesium concentration among flowering plants.

M.R. Broadley;N.J. Willey;A. Mead

138
Citations
Time-series transcriptomics reveals that AGAMOUS-LIKE22 affects primary metabolism and developmental processes in drought-stressed arabidopsis

Ulrike Bechtold;Christopher A Penfold;Dafyd J Jenkins;Roxane Legaie

131
Citations
One‐step analysis of seed storage data and the longevity of Arabidopsis thaliana seeds

Fiona R. Hay;Andrew Mead;Kirstine Manger;Fiona J. Wilson

108
Citations
Modelling the effect of weed‐seed distribution in the soil profile on seedling emergence

A. C. Grundy;A. Mead;W. Bond

106
Citations
Organic weed management: A review of the current UK farmer perspective

R.J. Turner;G. Davies;H. Moore;A.C. Grundy

103
Citations