World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
47
Citations
12659
World Ranking
2478
National Ranking
194

John P. Hammond publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John P. Hammond sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 116 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

John P. Hammond D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John P. Hammond sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Genetics

His scientific interests lie mostly in Botany, Shoot, Arabidopsis thaliana, Phosphorus metabolism and Nutrient. His Botany research integrates issues from Hyperaccumulator, Thlaspi caerulescens, Zea mays and Soil phosphorus. His Hyperaccumulator study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as genomic DNA, Transcriptome and In silico.

He has researched Shoot in several fields, including Phloem, Sugar, Acclimatization, Doubled haploidy and Root system. He studied Arabidopsis thaliana and Arabidopsis that intersect with Extracellular, Horticulture and Agar. His Phosphorus metabolism study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Cultivar, Crop yield, Agronomy, Brassica oleracea and Lateral root.

His most cited work include:

  • Zinc in plants (1169 citations)
  • How do plants respond to nutrient shortage by biomass allocation (737 citations)
  • Changes in Gene Expression in Arabidopsis Shoots during Phosphate Starvation and the Potential for Developing Smart Plants (354 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Botany, Agronomy, Shoot, Horticulture and Brassica. He combines subjects such as Arabidopsis thaliana, Hyperaccumulator, Thlaspi caerulescens and Genetic variation with his study of Botany. His study in Arabidopsis thaliana is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Ionomics and Arabidopsis.

He has included themes like Phosphorus metabolism, Phloem, Phosphate, Brassica oleracea and Nutrient in his Shoot study. His Root system, Sprouting and Dormancy study in the realm of Horticulture interacts with subjects such as Materials science. The study incorporates disciplines such as Quantitative trait locus, Lateral root and Canola in addition to Brassica.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (39.64%)
  • Agronomy (26.13%)
  • Shoot (23.42%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Horticulture (18.92%)
  • Brassica (20.72%)
  • Botany (39.64%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Horticulture, Brassica, Botany, Quantitative trait locus and Doubled haploidy are his primary areas of study. John P. Hammond interconnects Ploidy and Genetic variation in the investigation of issues within Horticulture. The various areas that John P. Hammond examines in his Brassica study include Flavobacterium, Genetics, Carbohydrate transport and Shoot.

His Shoot research includes elements of Arabidopsis thaliana, Ionomics, Phosphate and Genetic dissection. His Botany research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas stutzeri and Soil microbiology. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Cultivar and Oryza sativa.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • The ‘known’ genetic potential for microbial communities to degrade organic phosphorus is reduced in low-pH soils (39 citations)
  • The ‘known’ genetic potential for microbial communities to degrade organic phosphorus is reduced in low-pH soils (39 citations)
  • Identification of extracellular glycerophosphodiesterases in Pseudomonas and their role in soil organic phosphorus remineralisation. (13 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Genetics

John P. Hammond mainly investigates Botany, Medicago truncatula, Medicago, Autoregulation and Nitrogen fixation. His work carried out in the field of Botany brings together such families of science as Pseudomonas stutzeri and Soil microbiology. He integrates many fields, such as Medicago truncatula and engineering, in his works.

Best Publications

  • Zinc in plants

    Martin R. Broadley;Philip J. White;John P. Hammond;Ivan Zelko;Ivan Zelko

  • How do plants respond to nutrient shortage by biomass allocation

    Christian Hermans;John P. Hammond;Philip J. White;Nathalie Verbruggen

  • Sucrose transport in the phloem: integrating root responses to phosphorus starvation

    John P. Hammond;Philip J. White

  • Changes in Gene Expression in Arabidopsis Shoots during Phosphate Starvation and the Potential for Developing Smart Plants

    John P. Hammond;Malcolm J. Bennett;Helen C. Bowen;Martin R. Broadley

  • Genetic Responses to Phosphorus Deficiency

    John P. Hammond;Martin R. Broadley;Philip J. White

  • Shoot yield drives phosphorus use efficiency in Brassica oleracea and correlates with root architecture traits

    John P Hammond;Martin R Broadley;Philip J White;Graham J King

  • Phylogenetic variation in the shoot mineral concentration of angiosperms

    Martin R. Broadley;Helen C. Bowen;Helen L. Cotterill;John P. Hammond

  • A comparison of the Thlaspi caerulescens and Thlaspi arvense shoot transcriptomes.

    John P. Hammond;John P. Hammond;Helen C. Bowen;Philip J. White;Victoria Mills

  • Contrasting arbuscular mycorrhizal communities colonizing different host plants show a similar response to a soil phosphorus concentration gradient

    Paul Gosling;Andrew Mead;Maude Proctor;John P. Hammond

  • Nutrient Sensing and Signalling in Plants: Potassium and Phosphorus

    Anna Amtmann;John P. Hammond;Patrick Armengaud;Philip J. White

  • A SEPALLATA gene is involved in the development and ripening of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) fruit, a non-climacteric tissue.

    Graham B. Seymour;Carol D. Ryder;Volkan Cevik;John P. Hammond

  • The Ecophysiology of Plant-Phosphorus Interactions

    Philip J. White;John P. Hammond

  • Phosphorus nutrition of terrestrial plants

    Philip J. White;John P. Hammond

  • Sugar signaling in root responses to low phosphorus availability.

    John P. Hammond;Philip J. White

  • Cesium Toxicity in Arabidopsis

    Corrina R. Hampton;Helen C. Bowen;Martin R. Broadley;John P. Hammond

  • Relationships Between Yield and Mineral Concentrations in Potato Tubers

    Philip J. White;John E. Bradshaw;M. Finlay;B. Dale

  • Niche-adaptation in plant-associated Bacteroidetes favours specialisation in organic phosphorus mineralisation.

    Ian D. E. A. Lidbury;Ian D. E. A. Lidbury;Chiara Borsetto;Andrew R. J. Murphy;Andrew Bottrill

  • Tackling Drought Stress: RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASES Present New Approaches

    Alex Marshall;Reidunn B. Aalen;Dominique Audenaert;Tom Beeckman

  • Variation in the shoot calcium content of angiosperms

    Martin R. Broadley;Helen C. Bowen;Helen L. Cotterill;John P. Hammond

  • Response to zinc deficiency of two rice lines with contrasting tolerance is determined by root growth maintenance and organic acid exudation rates, and not by zinc-transporter activity.

    Widodo;Martin R. Broadley;Terry Rose;Michael Frei

  • Shoot Calcium and Magnesium Concentrations Differ between Subtaxa, Are Highly Heritable, and Associate with Potentially Pleiotropic Loci in Brassica oleracea

    Martin R. Broadley;John P. Hammond;Graham J. King;Dave Astley

  • Analyzing Lateral Root Development: How to Move Forward

    Ive De Smet;Philip J. White;A. Glyn Bengough;A. Glyn Bengough;Lionel Dupuy

  • A comparison of the Thlaspi caerulescens and Thlaspi arvense shoot transcriptomes. Commentary

    John P. Hammond;Helen C. Bowen;Philip J. White;Victoria Mills

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip J. White
Philip J. White James Hutton Institute
Martin R. Broadley
Martin R. Broadley Rothamsted Research
Graham J.W. King
Graham J.W. King University of Western Ontario
Neil S. Graham
Neil S. Graham University of Nottingham
Andrew Mead
Andrew Mead Rothamsted Research
Gary D. Bending
Gary D. Bending University of Warwick
Elizabeth M. H. Wellington
Elizabeth M. H. Wellington University of Warwick
David J. Scanlan
David J. Scanlan University of Warwick
Leon A. Terry
Leon A. Terry Cranfield University
Andrew J. Thompson
Andrew J. Thompson Cranfield University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing John P. Hammond

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles