World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 74 558 515 17 17 164 22719

Henk Schat publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Henk Schat between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Henk Schat published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2009. 7 of the 174 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2009. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 7 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 1 publication
1983 2025

174 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Henk Schat: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 2
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 4
1992 4
1993 2
1994 2
1995 1
1996 1
1997 3
1998 1
1999 7
2000 6
2001 6
2002 2
2003 8
2004 3
2005 5
2006 6
2007 8
2008 7
2009 9
2010 7
2011 4
2012 6
2013 7
2014 8
2015 8
2016 3
2017 8
2018 5
2019 6
2020 3
2021 5
2022 2
2023 4
2024 6
2025 1
Total 174
Download as CSV

Henk Schat publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henk Schat sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–165 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 164 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159 164
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Henk Schat D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henk Schat sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29 74
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Enzyme

His primary areas of study are Botany, Hyperaccumulator, Biochemistry, Cadmium and Thlaspi caerulescens. His research ties Arsenate and Botany together. In the subject of general Hyperaccumulator, his work in Noccaea caerulescens is often linked to Biological materials, thereby combining diverse domains of study.

His work in Biochemistry addresses issues such as Caryophyllaceae, which are connected to fields such as Silene. The study incorporates disciplines such as Phytoremediation, Metal and Heavy metal detoxification in addition to Cadmium. His Thlaspi caerulescens research integrates issues from Zinc and Thlaspi.

His most cited work include:

  • Hyperaccumulators of metal and metalloid trace elements: Facts and fiction (753 citations)
  • Molecular mechanisms of metal hyperaccumulation in plants (688 citations)
  • Mechanisms to cope with arsenic or cadmium excess in plants. (531 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Botany, Hyperaccumulator, Shoot, Cadmium and Zinc. His Botany research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Phytochelatin, Thlaspi caerulescens and Arabidopsis thaliana. Henk Schat interconnects Metallophyte, Thlaspi arvense, Nickel and Calamine in the investigation of issues within Hyperaccumulator.

His Shoot research focuses on Plant physiology and how it relates to Serpentine soil, Noccaea caerulescens and Nuclear chemistry. His Cadmium study combines topics in areas such as Chelation and Metal. Henk Schat combines subjects such as Phytotoxicity, Ecotype and Endodermis with his study of Zinc.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (61.38%)
  • Hyperaccumulator (35.86%)
  • Shoot (26.90%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Botany (61.38%)
  • Shoot (26.90%)
  • Hyperaccumulator (35.86%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Henk Schat mostly deals with Botany, Shoot, Hyperaccumulator, Plant physiology and Metallophyte. His work on Silene vulgaris is typically connected to Achillea wilhelmsii as part of general Botany study, connecting several disciplines of science. His Shoot study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Phosphorus, Nutrient, Xylem and Animal science.

The various areas that Henk Schat examines in his Hyperaccumulator study include Zinc and Cadmium. His work carried out in the field of Plant physiology brings together such families of science as Nickel, Chromosomal translocation, Noccaea caerulescens, Dry weight and Serpentine soil. The concepts of his Metallophyte study are interwoven with issues in Biscutella laevigata, Genetic diversity and Pycnandra acuminata.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Expression of the ZNT1 Zinc Transporter from the Metal Hyperaccumulator Noccaea caerulescens Confers Enhanced Zinc and Cadmium Tolerance and Accumulation to Arabidopsis thaliana (44 citations)
  • Constitutive high-level SOS1 expression and absence of HKT1;1 expression in the salt-accumulating halophyte Salicornia dolichostachya (42 citations)
  • Both the concentration and redox state of glutathione and ascorbate influence the sensitivity of arabidopsis to cadmium. (41 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Enzyme

His primary areas of investigation include Botany, Shoot, Arabidopsis, Cadmium and Metallophyte. His Botany study incorporates themes from Zinc and Hyperaccumulator. His Shoot research includes themes of Halophyte, Salinity, Salicornia and Gene expression.

Henk Schat has included themes like Arabidopsis thaliana, Reactive oxygen species, Cell biology, Glutathione and Peroxidase in his Arabidopsis study. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Thlaspi caerulescens, Iron deficiency and Calamine. His research integrates issues of Silene and Silene vulgaris in his study of Metallophyte.

Best Publications

  • Hyperaccumulators of metal and metalloid trace elements: Facts and fiction

    Antony van der Ent;Alan J. M. Baker;Roger D. Reeves;A. Joseph Pollard

  • Molecular mechanisms of metal hyperaccumulation in plants

    Nathalie Verbruggen;Christian Hermans;Henk Schat

  • Mechanisms to cope with arsenic or cadmium excess in plants.

    Nathalie Verbruggen;Christian Hermans;Henk Schat

  • Metal tolerance in plants

    W. H. O. Ernst;J. A. C. Verkleij;H. Schat

  • Large Expression Differences in Genes for Iron and Zinc Homeostasis, Stress Response, and Lignin Biosynthesis Distinguish Roots of Arabidopsis thaliana and the Related Metal Hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens

    Judith E. van de Mortel;Laia Almar Villanueva;Henk Schat;Jeroen Kwekkeboom

  • Glutathione Depletion Due to Copper-Induced Phytochelatin Synthesis Causes Oxidative Stress in Silene cucubalus

    C. H. Ric De Vos;Marjolein J. Vonk;Riet Vooijs;Henk Schat

  • Increased resistance to copper-induced damage of the root cell plasmalemma in copper tolerant Silene cucubalus

    C. H. R. De Vos;H. Schat;M. A. M. De Waal;R. Vooijs

  • Overexpression of a Novel Arabidopsis Gene Related to Putative Zinc-Transporter Genes from Animals Can Lead to Enhanced Zinc Resistance and Accumulation

    Bert J. van der Zaal;Leon W. Neuteboom;Johan E. Pinas;Agnes N. Chardonnens

  • Elevated expression of metal transporter genes in three accessions of the metal hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens

    A. G. L. Assunção;P. Da Costa Martins;S. De Folter;R. Vooijs

  • The role of phytochelatins in constitutive and adaptive heavy metal tolerances in hyperaccumulator and non‐hyperaccumulator metallophytes

    Henk Schat;Mercè Llugany;Riet Vooijs;Jeanette Hartley‐Whitaker

  • Thlaspi caerulescens, an attractive model species to study heavy metal hyperaccumulation in plants.

    Ana G. L. Assunção;Henk Schat;Mark G. M. Aarts

  • Heavy metal‐induced accumulation of free proline in a metal‐tolerant and a nontolerant ecotype of Silene vulgaris

    Henk Schat;Shanti S. Sharma;Riet Vooijs

  • Elevated expression of metal transporter genes in three accessions of the metal hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens: Zinc transporters of Thlaspi caerulescens

    A. G. L. Assunção;P. Da Costa Martins;S. De Folter;R. Vooijs

  • Expression differences for genes involved in lignin, glutathione and sulphate metabolism in response to cadmium in Arabidopsis thaliana and the related Zn/Cd-hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens

    Judith E. Van De Mortel;Henk Schat;Perry D. Moerland;Emiel Ver Loren Van Themaat

  • Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factors bZIP19 and bZIP23 regulate the adaptation to zinc deficiency

    Ana G. L. Assunção;Eva Herrero;Ya-Fen Lin;Bruno Huettel

  • Uptake, translocation and transformation of arsenate and arsenite in sunflower (Helianthus annuus): formation of arsenic-phytochelatin complexes during exposure to high arsenic concentrations.

    Andrea Raab;H. Schat;Andrew Alexander Meharg;Jorg Feldmann

  • Research Priorities for Conservation of Metallophyte Biodiversity and their Potential for Restoration and Site Remediation

    S. N. Whiting;R. D. Reeves;D. Richards;M. S. Johnson

  • Phytochelatins are involved in differential arsenate tolerance in Holcus lanatus.

    Jeanette Hartley-Whitaker;Gillian Ainsworth;Riet Vooijs;Wilma Ten Bookum

  • Genetic engineering in the improvement of plants for phytoremediation of metal polluted soils.

    S. Kärenlampi;H. Schat;J. Vangronsveld;J.A.C. Verkleij

  • Enhanced arsenate reduction by a CDC25-like tyrosine phosphatase explains increased phytochelatin accumulation in arsenate-tolerant Holcus lanatus.

    Petra M. Bleeker;Henk W.J. Hakvoort;Mattijs Bliek;Erik Souer

  • Phytochelatins in Cadmium-Sensitive and Cadmium-Tolerant Silene vulgaris (Chain Length Distribution and Sulfide Incorporation)

    J. A. De Knecht;M. Van Dillen;P. L. M. Koevoets;H. Schat

  • Differential metal-specific tolerance and accumulation patterns among Thlaspi caerulescens populations originating from different soil types.

    Ana G. L. Assunção;Wilma M. Bookum;Hans J. M. Nelissen;Riet Vooijs

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark G. M. Aarts
Mark G. M. Aarts Wageningen University & Research
Sirpa Kärenlampi
Sirpa Kärenlampi University of Eastern Finland
Alan J. M. Baker
Alan J. M. Baker University of Queensland
Maarten Koornneef
Maarten Koornneef Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research
Fang-Jie Zhao
Fang-Jie Zhao Nanjing Agricultural University
Antony van der Ent
Antony van der Ent University of Queensland
Jaco Vangronsveld
Jaco Vangronsveld Hasselt University
Steve P. McGrath
Steve P. McGrath Rothamsted Research
Ann Cuypers
Ann Cuypers Hasselt University
Cristina Gonnelli
Cristina Gonnelli University of Florence

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Henk Schat

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles