World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
31
Citations
6308
World Ranking
6079
National Ranking
346

David Pink publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Pink sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 94 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

David Pink D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Pink sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Fresh fruit and vegetables as vehicles for the transmission of human pathogens

    Cedric N. Berger;Samir V. Sodha;Robert K. Shaw;Patricia M. Griffin

  • The molecular analysis of leaf senescence--a genomics approach.

    Vicky Buchanan-Wollaston;Simon Earl;Elizabeth Harrison;Evy Mathas

  • Phyllosphere microbiology with special reference to diversity and plant genotype

    J. M. Whipps;Paul Hand;David Pink;G. D. Bending

  • Development of novel assays for lignin degradation: comparative analysis of bacterial and fungal lignin degraders

    Mark Ahmad;Charles R. Taylor;David Pink;Kerry Burton

  • Both Leaf Properties and Microbe-Microbe Interactions Influence Within-Species Variation in Bacterial Population Diversity and Structure in the Lettuce (Lactuca Species) Phyllosphere

    Paul J. Hunter;Paul Hand;David Pink;John M. Whipps

  • Genetics and Utilization of Pathogen Resistance in Plants.

    Ian R. Crute;David A. C. Pink

  • Strategies using genes for non-durable disease resistance

    David A.C. Pink

  • Shoot Calcium and Magnesium Concentrations Differ between Subtaxa, Are Highly Heritable, and Associate with Potentially Pleiotropic Loci in Brassica oleracea

    Martin R. Broadley;John P. Hammond;Graham J. King;Dave Astley

  • Identification of quantitative trait loci for resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in Brassica rapa

    P. Soengas;P. Soengas;Paul Hand;J. G. Vicente;J. M. Pole

  • The Evolutionary History of Wild, Domesticated, and Feral Brassica oleracea (Brassicaceae).

    Makenzie E. Mabry;Sarah D. Turner-Hissong;Evan Y. Gallagher;Alex C. McAlvay

  • Aspects of the Interactions between Wild Lactuca Spp. and Related Genera and Lettuce Downy Mildew (Bremia Lactucae)

    A. Lebeda;D. A. C. Pink;D. Astley

  • Deployment of disease resistance genes by plant transformation – a ‘mix and match’ approach

    David Pink;Ian Puddephat

  • Wild Lactuca species, their genetic diversity, resistance to diseases and pests, and exploitation in lettuce breeding

    Aleš Lebeda;Eva Křístková;Miloslav Kitner;Barbora Mieslerová

  • Evaluation of a core collection of Brassica oleracea accessions for resistance to Brevicoryne brassicae, the cabbage aphid

    P.R. Ellis;D.A.C. Pink;K. Phelps;P.L. Jukes

  • Novel pathotypes of lettuce mosaic virus — breakdown of a durable resistance?

    D. A. C. Pink;H. Lot;R. Johnson

  • Recovery of phenotypically normal transgenic plants of Brassica oleracea upon Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated co-transformation and selection of transformed hairy roots by GUS assay

    I. J. Puddephat;H. T. Robinson;T. M. Fenning;D. J. Barbara

  • Double haploids, markers and QTL analysis in vegetable brassicas

    David Pink;Liz Bailey;Sandy McClement;Paul Hand

  • Effect of silver nitrate on long-term culture and regeneration of callus from Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera.

    J. Williams;D. A. C. Pink;N. L. Biddington

  • Differentiation of pathotypes of lettuce mosaic virus.

    D. A. C. Pink;D. Kostova;D. G. A. Walkey

  • Human pathogens and the phyllosphere.

    John M. Whipps;Paul Hand;David A.C. Pink;Gary D. Bending

  • Resistance to Brevicoryne brassicae in horticultural brassicas

    P. R. Ellis;R. Singh;D. A. C. Pink;J. R. Lynn

  • Screening for genotype and environment effects on nitrate accumulation in 24 species of young lettuce.

    Ian G. Burns;Kefeng Zhang;Mary K. Turner;Mark C. Meacham

  • Variation in resistance to the cabbage aphid ( Brevicoryne brassicae) between and within wild and cultivated Brassica species

    P. R. Ellis;N. B. Kift;D. A. C. Pink;P. L. Jukes

  • Identification of differential resistance to six Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepae isolates in commercial onion cultivars through the development of a rapid seedling assay

    Andrew Taylor;V. Vagany;Dez J. Barbara;Brian Thomas

  • Cultivar-level genotype differences influence diversity and composition of lettuce (Lactuca sp.) phyllosphere fungal communities

    Paul J. Hunter;David A.C. Pink;Gary D. Bending

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary D. Bending
Gary D. Bending University of Warwick
Aleš Lebeda
Aleš Lebeda Palacký University, Olomouc
John M. Whipps
John M. Whipps University of Warwick
Andrew Mead
Andrew Mead Rothamsted Research
Gad Frankel
Gad Frankel Imperial College London
Graham J.W. King
Graham J.W. King University of Western Ontario
Martin R. Broadley
Martin R. Broadley Rothamsted Research
Carol Wagstaff
Carol Wagstaff University of Reading
Eric B. Holub
Eric B. Holub University of Warwick
J. Chris Pires
J. Chris Pires Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David Pink

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles