World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
54
Citations
15643
World Ranking
3963
National Ranking
1512

Jay L. Garland publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay L. Garland sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 186 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jay L. Garland D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay L. Garland sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jay L. Garland is affiliated with the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with a particular concentration in Water Science and Technology, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pollution, Nutrition and Dietetics, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist's work encompasses multiple topics related to environmental and public health concerns, including:

  • Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Jay L. Garland has contributed to several recent publications including:

  • "SARS-CoV-2 monitoring at three sewersheds of different scales and complexity demonstrates distinctive relationships between wastewater measurements and COVID-19 case data" (2021) published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment of Antimicrobial Resistant and Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in Reclaimed Wastewaters" (2021) published in Environmental Science & Technology
  • "A one health approach for monitoring antimicrobial resistance: developing a national freshwater pilot effort" (2024) published in Frontiers in Water
  • "Geospatial Patterns of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in the US EPA National Rivers and Streams Assessment Survey" (2022) published in Environmental Science & Technology
  • "Human Health, Economic and Environmental Assessment of Onsite Non-Potable Water Reuse Systems for a Large, Mixed-Use Urban Building" (2020) published in Sustainability

The frequent coauthors in their body of work include:

  • Michael A. Jahne
  • Scott P. Keely
  • Nichole E. Brinkman
  • Mary E. Schoen
  • Maitreyi Nagarkar

Jay L. Garland's research has been published extensively in certain venues with multiple contributions to:

  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Water Research
  • Environmental Science & Technology Letters
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Science Water Research & Technology

Best Publications

  • Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon-source utilization.

    Jay L. Garland;Aaron L. Mills

  • Manual of environmental microbiology.

    C. J. Hurst;R. L. Crawford;J. L. Garland;D. A. Lipson

  • Analysis and interpretation of community-level physiological profiles in microbial ecology

    Jay L Garland

  • Analytical approaches to the characterization of samples of microbial communities using patterns of potential C source utilization.

    Jay L. Garland

  • Significance of hydrated radius and hydration shells on ionic permeability during nanofiltration in dead end and cross flow modes

    Berrin Tansel;John C. Sager;Tony Rector;Jay L. Garland

  • Patterns of potential C source utilization by rhizosphere communities

    Jay L. Garland

  • Significance of dissolved methane in effluents of anaerobically treated low strength wastewater and potential for recovery as an energy product: A review.

    Brian C. Crone;Jay L. Garland;George A. Sorial;Leland M. Vane

  • An integrated approach to evaluate the impacts of the herbicides glyphosate, 2,4-D and metsulfuron-methyl on soil microbial communities in the Pampas region, Argentina

    Maria Celina Zabaloy;Jay L. Garland;Marisa Anahi Gomez

  • Effect of Nutrient Removal and Resource Recovery on Life Cycle Cost and Environmental Impacts of a Small Scale Water Resource Recovery Facility

    Ben Morelli;Sarah Cashman;Xin Cissy Ma;Jay Garland

  • Influence of Elevated CO2 on the Fungal Community in a Coastal Scrub Oak Forest Soil Investigated with Terminal-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis

    Morten Klamer;Michael S. Roberts;Lanfang H. Levine;Bert G. Drake

  • Impact of dilution on microbial community structure and functional potential: comparison of numerical simulations and batch culture experiments.

    Rima B. Franklin;Jay L. Garland;Carl H. Bolster;Aaron L. Mills

  • Relative effectiveness of kinetic analysis vs single point readings for classifying environmental samples based on community-level physiological profiles (CLPP)

    J.L. Garland;A.L. Mills;J.S. Young

  • Reproducibility in the response of soil bacterial community-level physiological profiles from a land use intensification gradient

    E. Gomez;J. Garland;M. Conti

  • Manual of Environmental Microbiology, Third Edition

    Christon J. Hurst;David A. Lipson;Jay L. Garland;Linda D. Stetzenbach

  • An assessment of US microbiome research.

    Elizabeth Stulberg;Deborah Fravel;Lita M. Proctor;David M. Murray

  • Biotransformations of Manganese

    Bradley M. Tebo;Brian G. Clement;Gregory J. Dick

  • Deposition of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and microtopographical changes on membrane surfaces during intermittent filtration conditions

    Berrin Tansel;John Sager;Jay Garland;Shaohua Xu

  • Assessment of microbial community function and structure in soil microcosms exposed to glyphosate

    María C. Zabaloy;Elena Gómez;Jay L. Garland;Marisa A. Gómez

  • Effects of microbial community diversity on the survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the wheat rhizosphere

    A. Matos;Lee J. Kerkhof;J. L. Garland

  • Dilution/extinction of community phenotypic characters to estimate relative structural diversity in mixed communities

    Jay L. Garland;R.Michael Lehman

  • Scales of temporal and spatial variability in the distribution of harmful algae species in the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, USA

    Edward J. Phlips;Susan Badylak;Mary Christman;Jennifer Wolny

  • Critical insights for a sustainability framework to address integrated community water services: Technical metrics and approaches

    Xiaobo Xue;Mary E Schoen;Xin Cissy Ma;Troy R Hawkins

  • Sustainable Water Systems for the City of Tomorrow—A Conceptual Framework

    Xin Ma;Xiaobo Xue;Alejandra González-Mejía;Jay Garland

Frequent Co-Authors

Aaron L. Mills
Aaron L. Mills University of Virginia
Cheryl L. Mackowiak
Cheryl L. Mackowiak University of Florida
Nicholas J. Ashbolt
Nicholas J. Ashbolt Queensland University of Technology
Gary S. Sayler
Gary S. Sayler University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Serita D. Frey
Serita D. Frey University of New Hampshire
George A. Sorial
George A. Sorial University of Cincinnati
Barth F. Smets
Barth F. Smets Technical University of Denmark
Nancy G. Love
Nancy G. Love University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Raymond M. Wheeler
Raymond M. Wheeler Kennedy Space Center
Michael L. Simpson
Michael L. Simpson University of Tennessee at Knoxville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths that blend science, policy, and social understanding. For students interested in exploring the societal impacts of environmental issues, pursuing one of the best online bachelors in sociology programs can provide valuable insights into human behavior and community dynamics.

Educators aiming to specialize in environmental education may benefit from advanced degrees. Programs like the edd no dissertation and best online eds to edd programs offer flexible, research-focused training without the demanding dissertation process, helping teachers and administrators make a greater impact in sustainability education.

For those seeking leadership roles in social work related to environmental justice and community health, the cheapest online dsw programs can provide an affordable pathway to doctoral-level credentials. These programs blend social work with environmental advocacy to address complex societal and ecological challenges.

Overall, online degrees in sociology, education, and social work complement environmental sciences by offering diverse approaches to tackling environmental problems from multiple perspectives.

Best Scientists Citing Jay L. Garland

Trending Scientists