World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
57
Citations
16583
World Ranking
3772
National Ranking
1801

Ahmed H. Tewfik publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ahmed H. Tewfik sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 577 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ahmed H. Tewfik D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ahmed H. Tewfik sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1996 - IEEE Fellow For contributions wavelet theory and fractal signal processing and their applications.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Statistics
  • Algorithm

Ahmed H. Tewfik spends much of his time researching Artificial intelligence, Digital watermarking, Computer vision, Watermark and Algorithm. Ahmed H. Tewfik has researched Artificial intelligence in several fields, including Speech recognition, Distortion, Frequency domain and Pattern recognition. His Digital watermarking study combines topics in areas such as Digital audio, Audio signal, Multimedia, Sequence and Robustness.

Many of his studies on Computer vision involve topics that are commonly interrelated, such as Perceptual Masking. The concepts of his Watermark study are interwoven with issues in Image processing, Image segmentation, Filter and Host. His Algorithm research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Mathematical optimization, Wavelet, Wavelet transform and Signal processing.

His most cited work include:

  • Multimedia data-embedding and watermarking technologies (859 citations)
  • Digital watermarks for audio signals (571 citations)
  • Robust audio watermarking using perceptual masking (449 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Ahmed H. Tewfik mainly investigates Artificial intelligence, Algorithm, Computer vision, Pattern recognition and Speech recognition. Artificial intelligence and Machine learning are frequently intertwined in his study. His Algorithm research includes themes of Mathematical optimization, Theoretical computer science, Wavelet and Radar.

His study in Iterative reconstruction, Data compression, Image resolution, Image processing and Frequency domain is carried out as part of his studies in Computer vision. Ahmed H. Tewfik interconnects Brain–computer interface and Cluster analysis in the investigation of issues within Pattern recognition. His Watermark research extends to Digital watermarking, which is thematically connected.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Artificial intelligence (38.65%)
  • Algorithm (21.91%)
  • Computer vision (17.93%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?

  • Artificial intelligence (38.65%)
  • Speech recognition (12.35%)
  • Electroencephalography (6.18%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Artificial intelligence, Speech recognition, Electroencephalography, Deep learning and Pattern recognition. His Artificial intelligence study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Algorithm, Machine learning and Computer vision. His Algorithm research integrates issues from State and Lattice reduction.

His work on Object detection as part of general Computer vision study is frequently connected to Data acquisition, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them. He usually deals with Speech recognition and limits it to topics linked to Decoding methods and Local field potential. His work deals with themes such as Image and Generative grammar, which intersect with Pattern recognition.

Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Speech Recognition with No Speech or with Noisy Speech (35 citations)
  • Advancing Speech Recognition With No Speech Or With Noisy Speech (25 citations)
  • State-of-the-art Speech Recognition using EEG and Towards Decoding of Speech Spectrum From EEG (23 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Statistics
  • Algorithm

His primary scientific interests are in Artificial intelligence, Speech recognition, Electroencephalography, Electronic engineering and Deep learning. His study in Artificial intelligence is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Brain–computer interface, Computer vision, Algorithm, Machine learning and Pattern recognition. In the subject of general Computer vision, his work in Filter, Template matching and Artifact is often linked to ECG Measurement, thereby combining diverse domains of study.

His research integrates issues of Speech spectrum, Noise, Connectionism, Decoding methods and Speech synthesis in his study of Electroencephalography. His work on Bandwidth as part of general Electronic engineering research is often related to Successive approximation ADC, thus linking different fields of science. His work carried out in the field of Deep learning brings together such families of science as Signal and Channel use.

Best Publications

  • Multimedia data-embedding and watermarking technologies

    M.D. Swanson;M. Kobayashi;A.H. Tewfik

  • Digital watermarks for audio signals

    Laurence Boney;Ahmed H. Tewfik;Khaled N. Hamdy

  • Robust audio watermarking using perceptual masking

    Mitchell D. Swanson;Bin Zhu;Ahmed H. Tewfik;Laurence Boney

  • Transparent robust image watermarking

    M.D. Swanson;Bin Zhu;A.H. Tewfik

  • Multiresolution scene-based video watermarking using perceptual models

    M.D. Swanson;Bin Zhu;A.H. Tewfik

  • Method and apparatus for embedding data, including watermarks, in human perceptible sounds

    Ahmed H. Tewfik;Mitchell D. Swanson;Bin Zhu;Laurence Boney

  • Correlation structure of the discrete wavelet coefficients of fractional Brownian motion

    A.H. Tewfik;M. Kim

  • Low bit rate transparent audio compression using adapted wavelets

    D. Sinha;A.H. Tewfik

  • A construction of a space-time code based on number theory

    M.O. Damen;A. Tewfik;J.C. Belflore

  • On the optimal choice of a wavelet for signal representation

    A.H. Tewfik;D. Sinha;P. Jorgensen

  • Geometric Invariance in image watermarking

    M. Alghoniemy;A.H. Tewfik

  • Robust data hiding for images

    M.D. Swanson;B. Zhu;A.H. Tewfik

  • Multimedia Data Embedding and Decoding

    Ahmed Tewfik;Mitchell D. Swanson;Bin Zhu

  • When seeing isn't believing [multimedia authentication technologies]

    B.B. Zhu;M.D. Swanson;A.H. Tewfik

  • Digital watermarking to resolve multiple claims of ownership

    Ahmed H. Tewfik;Mitchell D. Swanson;Bin Zhu

  • Audio-visual content-based violent scene characterization

    J. Nam;M. Alghoniemy;A.H. Tewfik

  • Method and apparatus for scene-based video watermarking

    Ahmed H. Tewfik;Mitchell D. Swanson;Bin Zhu

  • Data hiding for video-in-video

    M.D. Swanson;Bin Zhu;A.H. Tewfik

  • Geometric distortion correction through image normalization

    M. Alghoniemy;A.H. Tewfik

  • Distributed sensor network localization using SOCP relaxation

    S. Srirangarajan;A. Tewfik;Zhi-Quan Luo

Frequent Co-Authors

Bin Zhu
Bin Zhu Southeast University
Mostafa Kaveh
Mostafa Kaveh University of Minnesota
Arthur G. Erdman
Arthur G. Erdman University of Minnesota
Sriram Vishwanath
Sriram Vishwanath The University of Texas at Austin
Ahmet Enis Cetin
Ahmet Enis Cetin University of Illinois at Chicago
Mohamed-Slim Alouini
Mohamed-Slim Alouini King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Amy P.N. Skubitz
Amy P.N. Skubitz University of Minnesota
James Ashe
James Ashe University of Minnesota
Keshab K. Parhi
Keshab K. Parhi University of Minnesota
Michael A. Kuskowski
Michael A. Kuskowski University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related degree programs and career paths. Whether you want to specialize or diversify, online study offers affordable, flexible options to boost your skills in high-demand fields.

For those interested in protecting digital infrastructures, consider a cheapest cybersecurity degree. This path prepares you to combat the rising threat of cybercrime, often at a fraction of the cost found elsewhere.

If you prefer a blend of technology and project management, a masters in construction management could be valuable—teaching skills that bridge engineering, IT, and business.

Some students may want to serve their communities with knowledge gained from a criminal justice degree online, a versatile qualification leading to roles in law enforcement, forensics, or cybersecurity.

For those with an analytical mindset, examining the cost of accounting degree online is worthwhile. Accountancy, paired with tech skills, creates opportunities in finance, auditing, and data analysis.

No matter your goal, these pathways offer affordable online degrees designed to advance your career quickly and efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Ahmed H. Tewfik

Trending Scientists