World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Laurence Calzone

Laurence Calzone

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
33
Citations
6003
World Ranking
9349
National Ranking
225

Laurence Calzone publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurence Calzone sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 97 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Laurence Calzone D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurence Calzone sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laurence Calzone is affiliated with PSL University in France and has contributed extensively to the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans significant subfields such as Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Modeling and Simulation, Oncology, and Immunology.

The scientist's research topics include Gene Regulatory Network Analysis, Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks, Computational Drug Discovery Methods, Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction, Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth, Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, and Cell Image Analysis Techniques.

Calzone has published multiple papers, with notable recent contributions including:

  • Patient-specific Boolean models of signalling networks guide personalised treatments (2022, eLife)
  • Personalized logical models to investigate cancer response to BRAF treatments in melanomas and colorectal cancers (2021, PLoS Computational Biology)
  • PhysiBoSS 2.0: a sustainable integration of stochastic Boolean and agent-based modelling frameworks (2023, npj Systems Biology and Applications)
  • Setting the basis of best practices and standards for curation and annotation of logical models in biology-highlights of the [BC]2 2019 CoLoMoTo/SysMod Workshop (2020, Briefings in Bioinformatics)
  • BioSimulators: a central registry of simulation engines and services for recommending specific tools (2022, CU Scholar [University of Colorado Boulder])

Frequent coauthors in Calzone's scientific collaborations include Vincent Noël, Emmanuel Barillot, Andreï Zinovyev, Loïc Paulevé, and Aurélien Naldi.

Publication venues where Laurence Calzone regularly publishes comprise bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), PLoS Computational Biology, npj Systems Biology and Applications, Briefings in Bioinformatics, and Bioinformatics.

Best Publications

  • The Systems Biology Graphical Notation

    Nicolas Le Novere;Michael Hucka;Huaiyu Mi;Stuart Moodie

  • Integrative Analysis of Cell Cycle Control in Budding Yeast

    Katherine C. Chen;Laurence Calzone;Attila Csikasz-Nagy;Frederick R. Cross

  • BIOCHAM: an environment for modeling biological systems and formalizing experimental knowledge

    Laurence Calzone;François Fages;Sylvain Soliman

  • Mathematical Modelling of Cell-Fate Decision in Response to Death Receptor Engagement

    Laurence Calzone;Laurence Calzone;Laurence Calzone;Laurent Tournier;Laurent Tournier;Laurent Tournier;Simon Fourquet;Simon Fourquet;Simon Fourquet;Denis Thieffry;Denis Thieffry

  • Integrative modelling of the influence of MAPK network on cancer cell fate decision.

    Luca Grieco;Laurence Calzone;Isabelle Bernard-Pierrot;François Radvanyi

  • Computational Systems Biology of Cancer

    Emmanuel Barillot;Laurence Calzone;Philippe Hupe;Jean-Philippe Vert

  • A comprehensive modular map of molecular interactions in RB/E2F pathway

    Laurence Calzone;Laurence Calzone;Laurence Calzone;Amélie Gelay;Andrei Zinovyev;Andrei Zinovyev;Andrei Zinovyev;François Radvanyi

  • Atlas of Cancer Signalling Network: a systems biology resource for integrative analysis of cancer data with Google Maps

    Kuperstein I;Bonnet E;Bonnet E;Bonnet E;Nguyen Ha;Nguyen Ha;Nguyen Ha;Cohen D;Cohen D;Cohen D

  • Mathematical Modelling of Molecular Pathways Enabling Tumour Cell Invasion and Migration.

    David P. A. Cohen;Loredana Martignetti;Sylvie Robine;Emmanuel Barillot

  • Continuous time boolean modeling for biological signaling: application of Gillespie algorithm

    Gautier Stoll;Gautier Stoll;Gautier Stoll;Eric Viara;Emmanuel Barillot;Emmanuel Barillot;Emmanuel Barillot;Laurence Calzone;Laurence Calzone;Laurence Calzone

  • MaBoSS 2.0: an environment for stochastic Boolean modeling.

    Gautier Stoll;Barthélémy Caron;Eric Viara;Aurélien Dugourd

  • Machine learning biochemical networks from temporal logic properties

    Laurence Calzone;Nathalie Chabrier-Rivier;François Fages;Sylvain Soliman

  • Aberrant ERBB4-SRC Signaling as a Hallmark of Group 4 Medulloblastoma Revealed by Integrative Phosphoproteomic Profiling.

    Antoine Forget;Antoine Forget;Loredana Martignetti;Stéphanie Puget;Laurence Calzone

  • PhysiBoSS: a multi-scale agent-based modelling framework integrating physical dimension and cell signalling.

    Gaëlle Letort;Arnau Montagud;Arnau Montagud;Gautier Stoll;Randy W. Heiland

  • Patient-specific Boolean models of signalling networks guide personalised treatments

    Unknown

  • BiNoM: a Cytoscape plugin for manipulating and analyzing biological networks

    Andrei Yu. Zinovyev;Eric Viara;Laurence Calzone;Emmanuel Barillot

  • The CoLoMoTo Interactive Notebook: Accessible and Reproducible Computational Analyses for Qualitative Biological Networks

    Aurélien Naldi;Céline Hernandez;Nicolas Levy;Gautier Stoll

  • Integrative multi-omics module network inference with Lemon-Tree.

    Eric Bonnet;Laurence Calzone;Tom Michoel

  • COVID19 Disease Map, a computational knowledge repository of virus-host interaction mechanisms.

    Marek Ostaszewski;Anna Niarakis;Anna Niarakis;Alexander Mazein;Inna Kuperstein;Inna Kuperstein

  • Personalization of Logical Models With Multi-Omics Data Allows Clinical Stratification of Patients.

    Jonas Béal;Arnau Montagud;Pauline Traynard;Emmanuel Barillot

  • BiNoM 2.0, a Cytoscape plugin for accessing and analyzing pathways using standard systems biology formats.

    Eric Bonnet;Eric Bonnet;Eric Bonnet;Laurence Calzone;Laurence Calzone;Laurence Calzone;Daniel Rovera;Daniel Rovera;Daniel Rovera;Gautier Stoll;Gautier Stoll;Gautier Stoll

  • Classification of gene signatures for their information value and functional redundancy.

    Laura Cantini;Laurence Calzone;Loredana Martignetti;Mattias Rydenfelt

  • Correction: Integrative Modelling of the Influence of MAPK Network on Cancer Cell Fate Decision

    Luca Grieco;Laurence Calzone;Isabelle Bernard-Pierrot;François Radvanyi

Frequent Co-Authors

Emmanuel Barillot
Emmanuel Barillot Institute Curie
Andrei Zinovyev
Andrei Zinovyev Institute Curie
Denis Thieffry
Denis Thieffry École Normale Supérieure
Peter J. Wild
Peter J. Wild Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies
Claudine Chaouiya
Claudine Chaouiya Aix-Marseille University
Julio Saez-Rodriguez
Julio Saez-Rodriguez Heidelberg University
Guido Kroemer
Guido Kroemer Université Paris Cité
Chris Sander
Chris Sander Harvard University
Tom C. Freeman
Tom C. Freeman University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology transforms industries, related online degrees can open new doors for students interested in engineering and technology in the USA. Pursuing an online MBA is a popular pathway for those seeking leadership roles or advanced business skills. You can explore options such as an mba under 35k, helping you earn a valuable credential without a heavy financial burden.

There’s also a growing demand for professionals skilled in digital marketing and emerging technologies. A social media degree can complement your technical expertise, providing insights into online platforms and audience engagement—a vital skill in today's connected world.

For those interested in the booming service industry, an online hospitality management program offers a fast track to management roles. These programs combine technology, innovation, and business principles.

If affordability is a key consideration, seek out the cheapest online aacsb mba programs accredited for their quality and reputation. Each of these online degrees can serve as a strong foundation for in-demand career pathways in tech-driven industries.

Best Scientists Citing Laurence Calzone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles