World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
72
Citations
25200
World Ranking
6163
National Ranking
2899

Chemistry

D-Index
73
Citations
25154
World Ranking
4871
National Ranking
1526

Rowena G. Matthews publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rowena G. Matthews sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 216 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Rowena G. Matthews D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rowena G. Matthews sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2002 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Rowena G. Matthews is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a career that intersects various domains within science, although specifics regarding research papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, and book publications are not available.

The scientist has been recognized by several prestigious organizations over the years. In 1998, they were named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Subsequently, in 2002, they became a Member of the National Academy of Sciences. Further acknowledgment came in 2005 with the distinction of Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Their affiliations with these bodies suggest a standing in scientific communities that emphasize rigorous scholarship and contributions across disciplines. While there is no detailed data on specific fields and topics, these honors typically acknowledge a sustained impact in scientific research.

The absence of detailed data on research outputs, including specific papers or research topics, limits the ability to provide a granular overview of their scientific focus areas. Similarly, no information on frequent collaborators or dissemination patterns through journals or books is available.

Nonetheless, these recognitions indicate involvement with substantial scientific endeavors at an institutional level. The University of Michigan-Ann Arbor affiliation places them within a significant academic environment that has historically supported diverse scientific inquiry.

Best Publications

  • A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase

    P. Frosst;H. J. Blom;R. Milos;P. Goyette

  • Human methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase: isolation of cDNA, mapping and mutation identification

    Philippe Goyette;James S. Sumner;Renate Milos;Alessandra M.V. Duncan

  • Tautomeric Forms of Metarhodopsin

    Rowena G. Matthews;Ruth Hubbard;Paul K. Brown;George Wald

  • How a protein binds B12: A 3.0 A X-ray structure of B12-binding domains of methionine synthase

    Catherine Luschinsky Drennan;Sha Huang;James T. Drummond;Rowena G. Matthews

  • Cobalamin-dependent methionine synthase.

    Ruma V. Banerjee;Rowena G. Matthews

  • The structure and properties of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase from Escherichia coli suggest how folate ameliorates human hyperhomocysteinemia.

    Brian D. Guenther;Christal A. Sheppard;Pamela Tran;Rima Rozen

  • Effects of common polymorphisms on the properties of recombinant human methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase

    Kazuhiro Yamada;Zhoutao Chen;Rima Rozen;Rowena G. Matthews

  • The production of superoxide anion radicals in the reaction of reduced flavins and flavoproteins with molecular oxygen

    Vincent Massey;S. Strickland;Stephen G. Mayhew;Larry G. Howell

  • The reactivity of flavoproteins with sulfite. Possible relevance to the problem of oxygen reactivity.

    Vincent Massey;Franz Müller;Ross Feldberg;Marilyn Schuman

  • Structure-Based Perspectives on B12-Dependent Enzymes

    Martha L. Ludwig;Rowena G. Matthews

  • Cobalamin-dependent methyltransferases

    Rowena G. Matthews

  • Adaptation to famine: a family of stationary-phase genes revealed by microarray analysis.

    Travis H. Tani;Arkady Khodursky;Robert M. Blumenthal;Patrick O. Brown

  • The leucine-responsive regulatory protein, a global regulator of metabolism in Escherichia coli

    Unknown

  • Oxidative Stress Inactivates Cobalamin-Independent Methionine Synthase (MetE) in Escherichia coli

    Elise R Hondorp;Rowena G Matthews

  • Cobalamin-Dependent Methionine Synthase Is a Modular Protein with Distinct Regions for Binding Homocysteine, Methyltetrahydrofolate, Cobalamin, and Adenosylmethionine †

    Celia W. Goulding;Dellma Postigo;Rowena G. Matthews

  • Comparison of cobalamin-independent and cobalamin-dependent methionine synthases from Escherichia coli: two solutions to the same chemical problem.

    Julio C. Gonzalez;Ruma V. Banerjee;Sha Huang;James S. Sumner

  • Cobalamin-dependent and cobamide-dependent methyltransferases.

    Rowena G Matthews;Markos Koutmos;Supratim Datta

  • Mechanism of reductive activation of cobalamin-dependent methionine synthase: an electron paramagnetic resonance spectroelectrochemical study

    Ruma V. Banerjee;Scott R. Harder;Stephen W. Ragsdale;Rowena G. Matthews

  • Acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase from pig kidney. Purification and properties.

    Colin Thorpe;Rowena G. Matthews;Charles H. Williams

  • Structures of the N-terminal modules imply large domain motions during catalysis by methionine synthase.

    John C. Evans;Donald P. Huddler;Mark T. Hilgers;Gail Romanchuk

  • Enzyme-catalyzed methyl transfers to thiols: the role of zinc.

    Rowena G Matthews;Celia W Goulding

Frequent Co-Authors

Martha L. Ludwig
Martha L. Ludwig University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert Blumenthal
Robert Blumenthal University of Toledo
David P. Ballou
David P. Ballou University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James E. Penner-Hahn
James E. Penner-Hahn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ruma Banerjee
Ruma Banerjee University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Vincent Massey
Vincent Massey University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Charles H. Williams
Charles H. Williams University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rima Rozen
Rima Rozen McGill University
Arthur L. Horwich
Arthur L. Horwich Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Chemistry degree in the USA opens doors to diverse career options across science and healthcare. Many students consider related fields to enhance their employability and expertise. For those interested in healthcare sales, understanding how much do pharmaceutical sales reps make can help gauge the financial benefits of this dynamic career.

If you are passionate about patient care and medication management, exploring how do you become a pharmacist offers a clear pathway into this respected profession. Pharmacists require specialized education and licensure but enjoy strong job security and rewarding responsibilities.

Forensic science is another exciting avenue, particularly with the growth of legal and investigative roles. Online options make it easier to pursue online forensic science courses that prepare students for careers in crime labs and forensic analysis.

Additionally, careers such as autopsy technicians combine chemistry knowledge with medical investigations. Understanding the job market and educational requirements for autopsy technician jobs can help students align their studies with practical career outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing Rowena G. Matthews

Trending Scientists