World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
8993
World Ranking
10510
National Ranking
4401

Michael A. Heroux publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Heroux sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 212 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael A. Heroux D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Heroux sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael A. Heroux is affiliated with Sandia National Laboratories in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on computer science and decision sciences, with particular emphasis on scientific computing and data management. Their work explores distributed and parallel computing systems, research data management practices, cloud computing and resource management, parallel computing and optimization techniques, data quality and management, and advanced data storage technologies.

The researcher has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • Preparing sparse solvers for exascale computing, 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • How community software ecosystems can unlock the potential of exascale computing, 2021, Nature Computational Science
  • Research Software Science: Expanding the Impact of Research Software Engineering, 2022, Computing in Science & Engineering
  • Research Reproducibility, 2022, Computer
  • A Cast of Thousands: How the IDEAS Productivity Project Has Advanced Software Productivity and Sustainability, 2024, Computing in Science & Engineering

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Lois Curfman McInnes
  • James Willenbring
  • Rinku Gupta
  • Gregory R. Watson
  • Elsa Gonsiorowski

Michael A. Heroux has published extensively in several venues with multiple publications in Computing in Science & Engineering and arXiv (Cornell University). Other publication venues include Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, Nature Computational Science, and Computer.

Their work spans subfields such as information systems and management, information systems, computer networks and communications, hardware and architecture, and management science and operations research.

Best Publications

  • An overview of the Trilinos project

    Michael A. Heroux;Roscoe A. Bartlett;Vicki E. Howle;Robert J. Hoekstra

  • An Updated Set of Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms (BLAS)

    Susan Blackford;James Demmel;Jack Dongarra;Iain Duff

  • The International Exascale Software Project roadmap

    Jack Dongarra;Pete Beckman;Terry Moore;Patrick Aerts

  • Improving Performance via Mini-applications

    Paul Stewart Crozier;Heidi K. Thornquist;Robert W. Numrich;Alan B. Williams

  • An overview of Trilinos.

    Kevin R. Long;Raymond Stephen Tuminaro;Roscoe Ainsworth Bartlett;Robert John Hoekstra

  • Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods.

    Victoria Stodden;Marcia McNutt;David H. Bailey;Ewa Deelman

  • Toward a New Metric for Ranking High Performance Computing Systems

    Sandia Report;Jack Dongarra;Michael A. Heroux

  • An overview of the sparse basic linear algebra subprograms: The new standard from the BLAS technical forum

    Iain S. Duff;Michael A. Heroux;Roldan Pozo

  • High-performance conjugate-gradient benchmark

    Jack Dongarra;Michael A Heroux;Piotr Luszczek

  • Big data and extreme-scale computing: Pathways to Convergence-Toward a shaping strategy for a future software and data ecosystem for scientific inquiry

    M. Asch;T. Moore;R. Badia;M. Beck

  • Solving Complex-Valued Linear Systems via Equivalent Real Formulations

    David Day;Michael A. Heroux

  • HPCG Benchmark: a New Metric for Ranking High Performance Computing Systems

    Jack Dongarra;Michael A. Heroux;Piotr Luszczek

  • GEMMW: a portable level 3 BLAS Winograd variant of Strassen's matrix-matrix multiply algorithm

    Craig C. Douglas;Michael Heroux;Gordon Slishman;Roger M. Smith

  • Trilinos users guide.

    James M. Willenbring;Michael Allen Heroux

  • Segmented Operations for Sparse Matrix Computation on Vector Multiprocessors

    Guy E. Blelloch;Michael A. Heroux;Marco Zagha

  • Applied Mathematics Research for Exascale Computing

    J Dongarra;J Hittinger;J Bell;L Chacon

  • Toward Local Failure Local Recovery Resilience Model using MPI-ULFM

    Keita Teranishi;Michael A. Heroux

  • ROBUST ALGEBRAIC PRECONDITIONERS USING IFPACK 3.0.

    Marzio Sala;Michael A. Heroux

  • Fault-tolerant iterative methods via selective reliability.

    Kurt Brian Ferreira;Patrick G. Bridges;Michael Allen Heroux;Mark Frederick Hoemmen

  • A new overview of the Trilinos project

    Michael A. Heroux;James M. Willenbring

  • Parallel processing for scientific computing

    Michael A. Heroux;Padma Raghavan;Horst D. Simon

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack Dongarra
Jack Dongarra University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Andrew G. Salinger
Andrew G. Salinger Sandia National Laboratories
Manish Parashar
Manish Parashar University of Utah
Piotr Luszczek
Piotr Luszczek University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Andrew A. Chien
Andrew A. Chien University of Chicago
Horst D. Simon
Horst D. Simon Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Jacqueline H. Chen
Jacqueline H. Chen Sandia National Laboratories
Barry Smith
Barry Smith Argonne National Laboratory
John Shalf
John Shalf Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Iain S. Duff
Iain S. Duff Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Computer Science? There are several flexible options available for students seeking alternative pathways. For those just starting out, online associates degrees can be a cost-effective way to gain foundational knowledge and skills, while also offering the flexibility to study at your own pace.

If affordability is a priority, explore institutions offering affordable online courses for a wide range of programs, including Computer Science and related technology fields. These courses help minimize student debt while maximizing academic potential.

Not every student’s GPA reflects their true potential. Fortunately, there are online graduate schools with low gpa requirements. These schools offer opportunities for career advancement and specialized study even if your undergraduate grades were not perfect.

Finally, Computer Science offers diverse career options, much like what you’ll find exploring what can you do with an environmental science major. From software engineering to IT management, the skills gained through online degrees can open doors to roles across industries.

Best Scientists Citing Michael A. Heroux

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles