World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
36
Citations
6451
World Ranking
8620
National Ranking
2392

Andrew G. Salinger publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew G. Salinger sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 173 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Andrew G. Salinger D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew G. Salinger sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew G. Salinger is affiliated with Sandia National Laboratories in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with active contributions to subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, Computational Mechanics, and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics.

The scientist's main research topics encompass Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Climate Variability and Models, Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research, and Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, including Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing.

Salinger has co-authored multiple papers with frequent collaborators such as Jean-Christophe Golaz, Robert Jacob, Peter Caldwell, Mark A. Taylor, and Hyun-Gyu Kang.

Representative recent papers authored or co-authored by Andrew G. Salinger include:

  • The DOE E3SM Model Version 2: Overview of the Physical Model and Initial Model Evaluation, 2022, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Convection-Permitting Simulations With the E3SM Global Atmosphere Model, 2021, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • An implicit barotropic mode solver for MPAS-ocean using a modern Fortran solver interface, 2023, The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications
  • DOE ESMD-E3SM 2020 Principal Investigator Meeting Report, 2021, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Semi-implicit barotropic mode solver using ForTrilinos in MPAS-O and its test data, 2023, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, and The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications.

Best Publications

  • An overview of the Trilinos project

    Michael A. Heroux;Roscoe A. Bartlett;Vicki E. Howle;Robert J. Hoekstra

  • The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Overview and Evaluation at Standard Resolution

    Jean Christophe Golaz;Peter M. Caldwell;Luke P. Van Roekel;Mark R. Petersen

  • An overview of Trilinos.

    Kevin R. Long;Raymond Stephen Tuminaro;Roscoe Ainsworth Bartlett;Robert John Hoekstra

  • An Overview of the Atmospheric Component of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model

    P. J. Rasch;S. Xie;P.-L. Ma;W. Lin

  • Numerical Bifurcation Methods and their Application to Fluid Dynamics: Analysis beyond Simulation

    Henk A. Dijkstra;Fred W. Wubs;Andrew K. Cliffe;Eusebius Doedel

  • A stabilized assumed deformation gradient finite element formulation for strongly coupled poromechanical simulations at finite strain

    WaiChing Sun;Jakob T. Ostien;Andrew G. Salinger

  • Convection-Permitting Simulations with the E3SM Global Atmosphere Model

    Peter Martin Caldwell;Christopher Ryutaro Terai;Benjamin R Hillman;Noel D. Keen

  • A Comparison of Mesh Morphing Methods for 3D Shape Optimization

    Matthew L. Staten;Steven J. Owen;Suzanne M. Shontz;Andrew G. Salinger

  • Description and evaluation of the Community Ice Sheet Model (CISM) v2.1

    William H. Lipscomb;William H. Lipscomb;Stephen F. Price;Matthew J. Hoffman;Gunter R. Leguy

  • FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATIONS FOR LARGE-SCALE, COUPLED FLOWS IN ADJACENT POROUS AND OPEN FLUID DOMAINS

    A. G. Salinger;R. Aris;Jeffrey J Derby

  • Large‐scale eigenvalue calculations for stability analysis of steady flows on massively parallel computers

    Richard B. Lehoucq;Andrew G. Salinger

  • MPAS-Albany Land Ice (MALI): a variable-resolution ice sheet model for Earth system modeling using Voronoi grids

    Matthew J. Hoffman;Mauro Perego;Stephen F. Price;William H. Lipscomb;William H. Lipscomb

  • Bifurcation and stability analysis of laminar isothermal counterflowing jets

    R. P. Pawlowski;A. G. Salinger;J. N. Shadid;T. J. Mountziaris

  • Numerical challenges in the application of density functional theory to biology and nanotechnology

    L J D Frink;A G Salinger;M P Sears;J D Weinhold

  • LOCA 1.0 Library of Continuation Algorithms: Theory and Implementation Manual

    Andrew G. Salinger;Nawaf M. Bou-Rabee;Elizabeth A. Burroughs;Roger P. Pawlowski

  • Albany/FELIX : a parallel, scalable and robust, finite element, first-order Stokes approximation ice sheet solver built for advanced analysis

    I. K. Tezaur;M. Perego;A. G. Salinger;R. S. Tuminaro

  • Fundamental models of the metalorganic vapor-phase epitaxy of gallium nitride and their use in reactor design

    R.P Pawlowski;R.P Pawlowski;C Theodoropoulos;A.G Salinger;T.J Mountziaris

  • The direct calculation of periodic states of the reverse flow reactior—I. Methodology and propane combustion results

    Andrew G. Salinger;Gerhart Eigenberger

  • ALBANY: USING COMPONENT-BASED DESIGN TO DEVELOP A FLEXIBLE, GENERIC MULTIPHYSICS ANALYSIS CODE

    Andrew G. Salinger;Roscoe A. Bartlett;Andrew M. Bradley;Qiushi Chen

  • Two- and three-dimensional nonlocal density functional theory for inhomogeneous fluids: I. Algorithms and parallelization

    Laura J. Douglas Frink;Andrew G. Salinger

  • Modeling the spontaneous ignition of coal stockpiles

    Andrew G. Salinger;Rutherford Aris;Jeffrey J. Derby

Frequent Co-Authors

Raymond S. Tuminaro
Raymond S. Tuminaro Sandia National Laboratories
Stephen F. Price
Stephen F. Price Los Alamos National Laboratory
John N. Shadid
John N. Shadid Sandia National Laboratories
Richard B. Lehoucq
Richard B. Lehoucq Sandia National Laboratories
Matthew J. Hoffman
Matthew J. Hoffman Los Alamos National Laboratory
Michael A. Heroux
Michael A. Heroux Sandia National Laboratories
Jeffrey J. Derby
Jeffrey J. Derby University of Minnesota
William H. Lipscomb
William H. Lipscomb National Center for Atmospheric Research
Jean-Christophe Golaz
Jean-Christophe Golaz Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Carl Tim Kelley
Carl Tim Kelley North Carolina State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to numerous interdisciplinary opportunities. Students and professionals often expand their skill sets by pursuing degrees that complement technical expertise with business and leadership insights.

For those interested in the business side of technology, earning a bachelor of business administration online is a flexible way to build key management skills. Many engineering graduates advance into leadership roles with a masters in organizational leadership, which focuses on effective team management and organizational strategy.

An mba in operations management online is ideal for engineers looking to master project management and operational efficiency. For those seeking a quicker path with fewer admissions barriers, one year online mba programs no gmat requirements offer accelerated options to gain essential business acumen.

These pathways can enhance both career flexibility and earning potential, making them attractive choices for those pursuing technological careers with a business or leadership focus.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew G. Salinger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles