World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
80
Citations
21824
World Ranking
1624
National Ranking
796

Richard J. Weinberg publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Weinberg sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 160 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Richard J. Weinberg D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Weinberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard J. Weinberg is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily covers Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology as well as Neuroscience. Within these broader fields, their work frequently addresses Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Neurology.

Their research spans multiple main topics, including:

  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Cellular transport and secretion

They have published extensively in venues such as UNC Libraries, with 64 publications, as well as contributions to bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), eNeuro, Science, and Molecular Psychiatry.

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Contacts between the endoplasmic reticulum and other membranes in neurons, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Synaptic dysfunction and abnormal behaviors in mice lacking major isoforms of Shank3, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Postsynaptic Positioning of Endocytic Zones and AMPA Receptor Cycling by Physical Coupling of Dynamin-3 to Homer, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Ube3a is required for experience-dependent maturation of the neocortex, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Altered mGluR5-Homer scaffolds and corticostriatal connectivity in a Shank3 complete knockout model of autism, 2020, UNC Libraries

The scientist collaborates frequently with several researchers, notably A Burette, Morgan Sheng, Juli G. Valtschanoff, Eunjoon Kim, and Kristina D. Micheva.

Best Publications

  • Shank, a Novel Family of Postsynaptic Density Proteins that Binds to the NMDA Receptor/PSD-95/GKAP Complex and Cortactin

    Scott Naisbitt;Eunjoon Kim;Jian Cheng Tu;Bo Xiao

  • Cortico-striatal synaptic defects and OCD-like behaviours in Sapap3 -mutant mice

    Jeffrey M. Welch;Jing Lu;Ramona M. Rodriguiz;Nicholas C. Trotta

  • A β2 Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Complex Assembled with the Ca2+ Channel Cav1.2

    Monika A. Davare;Vladimir Avdonin;Duane D. Hall;Erik M. Peden

  • Synaptic dysfunction and abnormal behaviors in mice lacking major isoforms of Shank3

    Xiaoming Wang;Portia A. McCoy;Ramona M. Rodriguiz;Yanzhen Pan

  • Polarized Secretory Trafficking Directs Cargo for Asymmetric Dendrite Growth and Morphogenesis

    April C. Horton;Bence Rácz;Eric E. Monson;Anna L. Lin

  • Contacts between the endoplasmic reticulum and other membranes in neurons

    Yumei Wu;Christina Whiteus;C. Shan Xu;Kenneth J. Hayworth

  • Ultrastructure of Synapses in the Mammalian Brain

    Kristen M. Harris;Richard J. Weinberg

  • The Rac1-GEF Tiam1 Couples the NMDA Receptor to the Activity-Dependent Development of Dendritic Arbors and Spines

    Kimberley F. Tolias;Kimberley F. Tolias;Jay B. Bikoff;Jay B. Bikoff;Alain Burette;Suzanne Paradis;Suzanne Paradis

  • Direct Interaction of CASK/LIN-2 and Syndecan Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan and Their Overlapping Distribution in Neuronal Synapses

    Yi Ping Hsueh;Fu Chia Yang;Viktor Kharazia;Scott Naisbitt

  • CRIPT, a novel postsynaptic protein that binds to the third PDZ domain of PSD-95/SAP90.

    Martin Niethammer;Juli G Valtschanoff;Tarun M Kapoor;Daniel W Allison

  • A Unique Population of Ventral Tegmental Area Neurons Inhibits the Lateral Habenula to Promote Reward

    Alice M. Stamatakis;Joshua H. Jennings;Randall L. Ung;Grace A. Blair

  • Smaller Dendritic Spines, Weaker Synaptic Transmission, but Enhanced Spatial Learning in Mice Lacking Shank1

    Albert Y. Hung;Kensuke Futai;Carlo Sala;Juli G. Valtschanoff

  • Identification of an elaborate complex mediating postsynaptic inhibition.

    Akiyoshi Uezu;Daniel J. Kanak;Tyler W. A. Bradshaw;Erik J. Soderblom

  • Novel Anchorage of GluR2/3 to the Postsynaptic Density by the AMPA Receptor–Binding Protein ABP

    S Srivastava;P Osten;F.S Vilim;L Khatri

  • NADPH diaphorase in the spinal cord of rats.

    Juli G. Valtschanoff;Richard J. Weinberg;Aldo Rustioni

  • Laminar organization of the NMDA receptor complex within the postsynaptic density.

    Juli G. Valtschanoff;Richard J. Weinberg

  • Ube3a is required for experience-dependent maturation of the neocortex

    Koji Yashiro;Koji Yashiro;Thorfinn T Riday;Kathryn H Condon;Adam C Roberts

  • Altered mGluR5-Homer scaffolds and corticostriatal connectivity in a Shank3 complete knockout model of autism

    Xiaoming Wang;Alexandra L. Bey;Brittany M. Katz;Alexandra Badea

  • Interaction between GRIP and Liprin-α/SYD2 Is Required for AMPA Receptor Targeting

    Michael Wyszynski;Eunjoon Kim;Eunjoon Kim;Anthone W. Dunah;Maria Passafaro

  • Postsynaptic positioning of endocytic zones and AMPA receptor cycling by physical coupling of dynamin-3 to Homer.

    Jiuyi Lu;Thomas D. Helton;Thomas A. Blanpied;Bence Rácz

Frequent Co-Authors

Juli G. Valtschanoff
Juli G. Valtschanoff University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Aldo Rustioni
Aldo Rustioni University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Viktor Kharazia
Viktor Kharazia University of California, San Francisco
Morgan Sheng
Morgan Sheng Broad Institute
Harald H.H.W. Schmidt
Harald H.H.W. Schmidt Maastricht University
Eunjoon Kim
Eunjoon Kim Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Benjamin D. Philpot
Benjamin D. Philpot University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Michael D. Ehlers
Michael D. Ehlers MPM BioImpact
Stephen J. Smith
Stephen J. Smith Allen Institute for Brain Science
William C. Wetsel
William C. Wetsel Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Richard J. Weinberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles