World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
13587
World Ranking
4657
National Ranking
2097

Benjamin D. Philpot publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin D. Philpot sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 127 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Benjamin D. Philpot D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin D. Philpot sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Benjamin D. Philpot is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and neuroscience, covering a wide range of topics related to genetic syndromes, neurodevelopmental disorders, and neural dynamics.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Neuroscience

Within these areas, specific subfields have been explored extensively, such as:

  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

The principal topics of their work include:

  • Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Congenital heart defects research

Benjamin D. Philpot has collaborated frequently with colleagues such as A Burette, Mark J. Zylka, Matthew C. Judson, Jeremy M. Simon, and Hyojin Kim, with these coauthors contributing to numerous publications.

Notable recent papers include:

  • A myelin-related transcriptomic profile is shared by Pitt-Hopkins syndrome models and human autism spectrum disorder, 2020, Nature Neuroscience
  • Content and Performance of the MiniMUGA Genotyping Array: A New Tool To Improve Rigor and Reproducibility in Mouse Research, 2020, Genetics
  • Region and Cell Type Distribution of TCF4 in the Postnatal Mouse Brain, 2020, Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
  • Dual-isoform hUBE3A gene transfer improves behavioral and seizure outcomes in Angelman syndrome model mice, 2021, JCI Insight
  • Regulation of NMDA receptor subunit expression and its implications for LTD, LTP, and metaplasticity, 2020, UNC Libraries

Their work has been published extensively in venues such as UNC Libraries, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, JCI Insight, and the Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Best Publications

  • Regulation of NMDA receptor subunit expression and its implications for LTD, LTP, and metaplasticity.

    Koji Yashiro;Benjamin D. Philpot

  • Conditional Knock-Out of Kir4.1 Leads to Glial Membrane Depolarization, Inhibition of Potassium and Glutamate Uptake, and Enhanced Short-Term Synaptic Potentiation

    Biljana Djukic;Kristen B. Casper;Benjamin D. Philpot;Lih Shen Chin

  • Rapid, experience-dependent expression of synaptic NMDA receptors in visual cortex in vivo

    Elizabeth M. Quinlan;Benjamin D. Philpot;Richard L. Huganir;Mark F. Bear

  • Internalization of ionotropic glutamate receptors in response to mGluR activation.

    Eric M. Snyder;Benjamin D. Philpot;Kimberly M. Huber;Xin Dong

  • Synaptic dysfunction and abnormal behaviors in mice lacking major isoforms of Shank3

    Xiaoming Wang;Portia A. McCoy;Ramona M. Rodriguiz;Yanzhen Pan

  • Forebrain-specific calcineurin knockout selectively impairs bidirectional synaptic plasticity and working/episodic-like memory.

    Hongkui Zeng;Sumantra Chattarji;Sumantra Chattarji;Michaela Barbarosie;Laure Rondi-Reig

  • NMDA receptor-dependent ocular dominance plasticity in adult visual cortex.

    Nathaniel B Sawtell;Mikhail Y Frenkel;Benjamin D Philpot;Kazu Nakazawa

  • Visual Experience and Deprivation Bidirectionally Modify the Composition and Function of NMDA Receptors in Visual Cortex

    Benjamin D. Philpot;Aarti K. Sekhar;Harel Z. Shouval;Mark F. Bear

  • Topoisomerases facilitate transcription of long genes linked to autism

    Ian F. King;Chandri N. Yandava;Angela M. Mabb;Jack S. Hsiao

  • Topoisomerase inhibitors unsilence the dormant allele of Ube3a in neurons.

    Hsien Sung Huang;John A. Allen;Angela M. Mabb;Ian F. King

  • Ube3a is required for experience-dependent maturation of the neocortex

    Koji Yashiro;Koji Yashiro;Thorfinn T Riday;Kathryn H Condon;Adam C Roberts

  • Angelman syndrome: insights into genomic imprinting and neurodevelopmental phenotypes.

    Angela M. Mabb;Matthew C. Judson;Mark J. Zylka;Benjamin D. Philpot

  • Transsynaptic Signaling by Activity-Dependent Cleavage of Neuroligin-1

    Rui T. Peixoto;Portia A. Kunz;Hyungbae Kwon;Angela M. Mabb

  • Obligatory Role of NR2A for Metaplasticity in Visual Cortex

    Benjamin D. Philpot;Kathleen K.A. Cho;Mark F. Bear

  • Evidence for Altered NMDA Receptor Function as a Basis for Metaplasticity in Visual Cortex

    Benjamin D. Philpot;Juan S. Espinosa;Mark F. Bear

  • Influence of the NR3A subunit on NMDA receptor functions

    Maile A. Henson;Adam C. Roberts;Isabel Pérez-Otaño;Benjamin D. Philpot

  • Maternal Loss of Ube3a Produces an Excitatory/Inhibitory Imbalance through Neuron Type-Specific Synaptic Defects

    Michael L. Wallace;Alain C. Burette;Richard J. Weinberg;Benjamin D. Philpot

  • Presynaptic NMDA Receptors: Newly Appreciated Roles in Cortical Synaptic Function and Plasticity

    Rebekah Corlew;Daniel J. Brasier;Daniel E. Feldman;Benjamin D. Philpot

  • Developmental Switch in the Contribution of Presynaptic and Postsynaptic NMDA Receptors to Long-Term Depression

    Rebekah Corlew;Yun Wang;Haben Ghermazien;Alev Erisir

  • Downregulation of NR3A-Containing NMDARs Is Required for Synapse Maturation and Memory Consolidation

    Adam C. Roberts;Javier Díez-García;Ramona M. Rodriguiz;Iciar Paula López

  • Conditional knock-out of K(ir)4.1 leads to glial membrane depolarization, inhibition of potassium and glutamate uptake, and enhanced short-term synaptic Potentiation

    Biljana Djukic;Kristen B. Casper;Benjamin D. Philpot;Lih-Shen Chin

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard J. Weinberg
Richard J. Weinberg University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Michael D. Ehlers
Michael D. Ehlers MPM BioImpact
Ype Elgersma
Ype Elgersma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Sheryl S. Moy
Sheryl S. Moy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
J. David Sweatt
J. David Sweatt University of Alabama at Birmingham
Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena
Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
David W. Threadgill
David W. Threadgill Texas A&M University
Terry Magnuson
Terry Magnuson University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads students toward varied career pathways in mental health, research, and therapy. Many related disciplines offer flexible online degree options, allowing learners to balance education with personal commitments.

If you are interested in counseling and therapy, consider reviewing online mft programs to gain specialized skills in family and couples therapy. A broader look at the mind and behavior can be achieved by pursuing a masters of psychology online, which deepens your understanding of psychological principles and opens doors to non-clinical and research roles.

For those seeking a foundational degree, a psychology degree online provides an excellent starting point. Individuals passionate about social work and advocacy can explore the easiest msw online program options, making it possible to join the field of social work while studying remotely.

Each pathway complements neuroscience by strengthening your interdisciplinary knowledge and expanding your career opportunities in research, therapy, or social services.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin D. Philpot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles