World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
54
Citations
16001
World Ranking
4845
National Ranking
2179

Kimberly M. Huber publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly M. Huber sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 99 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kimberly M. Huber D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly M. Huber sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kimberly M. Huber is affiliated with The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with notable contributions to Neuroscience. The subfields of study include Genetics, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Cell Biology.

The central themes of Huber's work focus on Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Autism Spectrum Disorder Research, Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, Pancreatic function and diabetes, RNA modifications and cancer, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, and Congenital heart defects research.

Huber has published extensively in several scientific venues. Frequent publication locations include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Cell Reports
  • Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
  • Science Translational Medicine

Notable recent papers by Huber encompass the following:

  • "FMRP Control of Ribosome Translocation Promotes Chromatin Modifications and Alternative Splicing of Neuronal Genes Linked to Autism" (2020, Cell Reports)
  • "Selective inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase 3α corrects pathophysiology in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome" (2020, Science Translational Medicine)
  • "Excitatory neuron-specific suppression of the integrated stress response contributes to autism-related phenotypes in fragile X syndrome" (2023, Neuron)
  • "Ribosome profiling in mouse hippocampus: plasticity-induced regulation and bidirectional control by TSC2 and FMRP" (2020, Molecular Autism)
  • "Experience-dependent weakening of callosal synaptic connections in the absence of postsynaptic FMRP" (2021, eLife)

Collaborative efforts characterize a significant portion of Huber's research activity. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Jay R. Gibson
  • Gemma Molinaro
  • Khaleel A. Razak
  • Shari G. Birnbaum
  • Zhe Zhang

Best Publications

  • The mGluR theory of fragile X mental retardation

    Mark F Bear;Kimberly M Huber;Stephen T Warren

  • Altered synaptic plasticity in a mouse model of fragile X mental retardation

    Kimberly M. Huber;Kimberly M. Huber;Sean M. Gallagher;Stephen T. Warren;Mark F. Bear

  • Role for rapid dendritic protein synthesis in hippocampal mGluR-dependent long-term depression.

    Kimberly M. Huber;Matthew S. Kayser;Mark F. Bear

  • Group 1 mGluR-Dependent Synaptic Long-Term Depression: Mechanisms and Implications for Circuitry and Disease

    Christian Lüscher;Kimberly M. Huber

  • Internalization of ionotropic glutamate receptors in response to mGluR activation.

    Eric M. Snyder;Benjamin D. Philpot;Kimberly M. Huber;Xin Dong

  • Imbalance of Neocortical Excitation and Inhibition and Altered UP States Reflect Network Hyperexcitability in the Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome

    Jay R. Gibson;Aundrea F. Bartley;Seth A. Hays;Kimberly M. Huber

  • Rapid Translation of Arc/Arg3.1 Selectively Mediates mGluR-Dependent LTD through Persistent Increases in AMPAR Endocytosis Rate

    Maggie W. Waung;Brad E. Pfeiffer;Elena D. Nosyreva;Jennifer A. Ronesi

  • Chemical Induction of mGluR5- and Protein Synthesis–Dependent Long-Term Depression in Hippocampal Area CA1

    Kimberly M. Huber;John C. Roder;Mark F. Bear

  • Metabotropic Receptor-Dependent Long-Term Depression Persists in the Absence of Protein Synthesis in the Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome

    Elena D. Nosyreva;Kimberly M. Huber

  • Small molecules enable neurogenin 2 to efficiently convert human fibroblasts into cholinergic neurons

    Meng Lu Liu;Tong Zang;Yuhua Zou;Joshua C. Chang

  • Multiple Autism-Linked Genes Mediate Synapse Elimination via Proteasomal Degradation of a Synaptic Scaffold PSD-95

    Nien Pei Tsai;Julia R. Wilkerson;Weirui Guo;Marina A. Maksimova

  • Homer interactions are necessary for metabotropic glutamate receptor-induced long-term depression and translational activation.

    Jennifer A. Ronesi;Kimberly M. Huber

  • Extracellular Signal-Regulated Protein Kinase Activation Is Required for Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor-Dependent Long-Term Depression in Hippocampal Area CA1

    Sean M. Gallagher;Christine A. Daly;Mark F. Bear;Kimberly M. Huber

  • Brain cholesterol turnover required for geranylgeraniol production and learning in mice

    Tiina J. Kotti;Denise M. O. Ramirez;Brad E. Pfeiffer;Kimberly M. Huber

  • Disrupted Homer scaffolds mediate abnormal mGluR5 function in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome

    Jennifer A. Ronesi;Katie A. Collins;Seth A. Hays;Nien Pei Tsai

  • PLC-β1, activated via mGluRs, mediates activity-dependent differentiation in cerebral cortex

    Anthony J. Hannan;Colin Blakemore;Alla Katsnelson;Tania Vitalis

  • Developmental Switch in Synaptic Mechanisms of Hippocampal Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor-Dependent Long-Term Depression

    Elena D. Nosyreva;Kimberly M. Huber

  • The State of Synapses in Fragile X Syndrome

    Brad E. Pfeiffer;Kimberly M. Huber

  • Neuroligin-2 Deletion Selectively Decreases Inhibitory Synaptic Transmission Originating from Fast-Spiking but Not from Somatostatin-Positive Interneurons

    Jay R. Gibson;Kimberly M. Huber;Thomas C. Südhof;Thomas C. Südhof

  • MEF2C regulates cortical inhibitory and excitatory synapses and behaviors relevant to neurodevelopmental disorders.

    Adam J Harrington;Adam J Harrington;Aram Raissi;Kacey Rajkovich;Stefano Berto

  • Differential roles for group 1 mGluR subtypes in induction and expression of chemically induced hippocampal long-term depression

    Lenora J. Volk;Christine A. Daly;Kimberly M. Huber

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen T. Warren
Stephen T. Warren Emory University
Seth A. Hays
Seth A. Hays The University of Texas at Dallas
Joel D. Richter
Joel D. Richter University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Joseph P. Albanesi
Joseph P. Albanesi The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Gary J. Bassell
Gary J. Bassell Emory University
John C. Roder
John C. Roder University of Toronto
Shari G. Birnbaum
Shari G. Birnbaum The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Peter C. Kind
Peter C. Kind University of Edinburgh
Michael Q. Zhang
Michael Q. Zhang The University of Texas at Dallas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kimberly M. Huber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles