World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephen T. Warren

Stephen T. Warren

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
101
Citations
51432
World Ranking
716
National Ranking
364

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
51469
World Ranking
7828
National Ranking
4079

Stephen T. Warren publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen T. Warren sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 252 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Stephen T. Warren D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen T. Warren sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2011 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

Stephen T. Warren was affiliated with Emory University in the United States. Their research primarily focused on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a significant emphasis on genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders. They contributed to several subfields including genetics, molecular biology, cognitive neuroscience, plant science, and cell biology.

The scientist's work covered a range of topics such as genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, congenital heart defects research, genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, autism spectrum disorder research, epigenetics and DNA methylation, genetic associations and epidemiology, and chromosomal and genetic variations.

Frequent coauthors included Michael E. Zwick, Jennifer G. Mullé, Gary J. Bassell, David J. Cutler, and Michael P. Epstein.

Stephen T. Warren's publications were often found in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • UNC Libraries
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • Nature Neuroscience

Notable recent papers by Stephen T. Warren included:

  • A human forebrain organoid model of fragile X syndrome exhibits altered neurogenesis and highlights new treatment strategies, 2021, Nature Neuroscience
  • Genetic contributors to risk of schizophrenia in the presence of a 22q11.2 deletion, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Cell-type-specific profiling of human cellular models of fragile X syndrome reveal PI3K-dependent defects in translation and neurogenesis, 2021, Cell Reports
  • Deep phenotyping in 3q29 deletion syndrome: recommendations for clinical care, 2021, Genetics in Medicine
  • A normative chart for cognitive development in a genetically selected population, 2021, Neuropsychopharmacology

Throughout their career, Stephen T. Warren received several honors including:

  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2020
  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2015
  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011

Best Publications

  • Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome

    Annemiske J.M.H. Verkerk;Maura Pieretti;James S. Sutcliffe;Ying-Hui Fu

  • Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox.

    Ying-Hui Fu;Derek P.A. Kuhl;Antonio Pizzuti;Maura Pieretti

  • The mGluR theory of fragile X mental retardation

    Mark F Bear;Kimberly M Huber;Stephen T Warren

  • Absence of expression of the FMR-1 gene in fragile X syndrome.

    Maura Pieretti;Fuping Zhang;Ying-Hui Fu;Stephen T. Warren

  • Altered synaptic plasticity in a mouse model of fragile X mental retardation

    Kimberly M. Huber;Kimberly M. Huber;Sean M. Gallagher;Stephen T. Warren;Mark F. Bear

  • Microarray Identification of FMRP-Associated Brain mRNAs and Altered mRNA Translational Profiles in Fragile X Syndrome

    Victoria Brown;Victoria Brown;Peng Jin;Peng Jin;Stephanie Ceman;Stephanie Ceman;Jennifer C. Darnell

  • Fragile X Syndrome: Loss of Local mRNA Regulation Alters Synaptic Development and Function

    Gary J. Bassell;Stephen T. Warren

  • Mapping of DNA instability at the fragile X to a trinucleotide repeat sequence p(CCG)n.

    EJ Kremer;M Pritchard;M Lynch;S Yu

  • Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein Targets G Quartet mRNAs Important for Neuronal Function

    Jennifer C. Darnell;Kirk B. Jensen;Peng Jin;Victoria Brown

  • Fragile X genotype characterized by an unstable region of DNA

    S. Yu;M. Pritchard;E. Kremer;M. Lynch

  • FMR1 protein: conserved RNP family domains and selective RNA binding

    Claude T. Ashley;Keith D. Wilkinson;Daniel Reines;Stephen T. Warren

  • DNA methylation represses FMR-1 transcription in fragile X syndrome

    Sutcliffe Js;Nelson Dl;Zhang F;Pieretti M

  • Biochemical and genetic interaction between the fragile X mental retardation protein and the microRNA pathway

    Peng Jin;Daniela C Zarnescu;Stephanie Ceman;Stephanie Ceman;Mika Nakamoto

  • A mutation in human CMP-sialic acid hydroxylase occurred after the Homo-Pan divergence

    Hsun Hua Chou;Hiromu Takematsu;Sandra Diaz;Jane Iber

  • Molecular Mechanisms of Fragile X Syndrome: A Twenty-Year Perspective

    Michael R. Santoro;Steven M. Bray;Stephen T. Warren

  • Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein: Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling and Association with Somatodendritic Ribosomes

    Yue Feng;Claire-Anne Gutekunst;Derek E. Eberhart;Hong Yi

  • FMRP Associates with Polyribosomes as an mRNP, and the I304N Mutation of Severe Fragile X Syndrome Abolishes This Association

    Yue Feng;Devin Absher;Derek E Eberhart;Victoria Brown

  • Reduced FMRP and increased FMR1 transcription is proportionally associated with CGG repeat number in intermediate-length and premutation carriers

    Aileen Kenneson;Fuping Zhang;Curt H. Hagedorn;Stephen T. Warren

  • A decade of molecular studies of fragile X syndrome.

    William T. O'Donnell;Stephen T. Warren

  • TRINUCLEOTIDE REPEAT EXPANSION AND HUMAN DISEASE

    Claude T. Ashley;Stephen T. Warren

Frequent Co-Authors

David L. Nelson
David L. Nelson Baylor College of Medicine
Peng Jin
Peng Jin Emory University
Gary J. Bassell
Gary J. Bassell Emory University
Michael P. Epstein
Michael P. Epstein Emory University
James S. Sutcliffe
James S. Sutcliffe Vanderbilt University
Stephanie L. Sherman
Stephanie L. Sherman Emory University
Ben A. Oostra
Ben A. Oostra Erasmus University Rotterdam
Beverly S. Emanuel
Beverly S. Emanuel Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
David J. Cutler
David J. Cutler Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in genetics can open doors to a wide range of careers in healthcare and research. Many students choose to complement their genetics studies with online degrees or certifications in related fields. This approach not only enhances career flexibility but also fits well into busy schedules.

Nurses looking to advance their education may be interested in online rn to bsn programs no clinicals, which provide a flexible, theory-based pathway without the need for on-site clinical rotations. For those aiming for advanced practice roles, exploring the shortest dnp program online can be an efficient way to earn a terminal nursing degree.

Those interested in entering the medical field quickly might consider the fastest medical assistant program. These accelerated options allow for rapid entry into healthcare support roles. For working professionals, the easiest online dnp programs can help balance rigorous study with other commitments.

Each of these pathways can complement genetics qualifications, helping students build a multidisciplinary skill set that is highly valued in the evolving landscape of healthcare and biomedical research.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen T. Warren

Recently Published Articles