World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephen T. Warren

Stephen T. Warren

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 101 7827 4078 262 51469
Genetics 101 716 364 252 51432

Stephen T. Warren publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephen T. Warren between 1967 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephen T. Warren published across 59 years, from 1967 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 1992. 1 of the 275 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 1992. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1967 2025

275 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephen T. Warren: publications per year, 1967 to 2025
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 0
1977 1
1978 1
1979 0
1980 3
1981 3
1982 3
1983 0
1984 2
1985 2
1986 0
1987 1
1988 3
1989 1
1990 3
1991 10
1992 13
1993 11
1994 5
1995 8
1996 9
1997 10
1998 7
1999 6
2000 11
2001 7
2002 6
2003 6
2004 7
2005 4
2006 7
2007 12
2008 10
2009 3
2010 13
2011 6
2012 10
2013 7
2014 11
2015 5
2016 5
2017 6
2018 5
2019 8
2020 5
2021 8
2022 6
2023 2
2024 0
2025 1
Total 275
Download as CSV

Stephen T. Warren publications per year - data summary

  • Stephen T. Warren, a Genetics scholar from Emory University, has 275 publications recorded across 59 years, from 1967 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1967 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 1992 and 2010, with 13 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1967, 1975, 1977, 1978 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 12 of the 59 years in the span carry no publications at all (1968, 1969, 1970, 1971 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.9 per year counting only the 47 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 17 publications, 6% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1967-1986: 17 publications (0.8 per year); 1987-2006: 135 publications (6.8 per year); 2007-2025: 123 publications (6.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Stephen T. Warren publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen T. Warren sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 245–254 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 252 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114 252
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephen T. Warren publication distribution in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 67 ranges running from 45–54 to 703+ publications.
  • Stephen T. Warren, a Genetics scholar from Emory University, records 252 publications - the 66th percentile of the discipline.
  • 66% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Stephen T. Warren, and about 34% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 195–204 publications range, and Stephen T. Warren ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 125–134 publications, holding 217 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 56% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 205–214 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 703 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Stephen T. Warren D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen T. Warren sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49 101
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Stephen T. Warren D-index placement in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 40–41 to 160+ D-Index.
  • Stephen T. Warren, a Genetics scholar from Emory University, records 101 D-Index - the 84th percentile of the discipline.
  • 84% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Stephen T. Warren, and about 16% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 70–71 D-Index range, and Stephen T. Warren ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 62–63 D-Index, holding 191 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 51% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 70–71 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2011 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

Stephen T. Warren was affiliated with Emory University in the United States. Their research primarily focused on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a significant emphasis on genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders. They contributed to several subfields including genetics, molecular biology, cognitive neuroscience, plant science, and cell biology.

The scientist's work covered a range of topics such as genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, congenital heart defects research, genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, autism spectrum disorder research, epigenetics and DNA methylation, genetic associations and epidemiology, and chromosomal and genetic variations.

Frequent coauthors included Michael E. Zwick, Jennifer G. Mullé, Gary J. Bassell, David J. Cutler, and Michael P. Epstein.

Stephen T. Warren's publications were often found in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • UNC Libraries
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • Nature Neuroscience

Notable recent papers by Stephen T. Warren included:

  • A human forebrain organoid model of fragile X syndrome exhibits altered neurogenesis and highlights new treatment strategies, 2021, Nature Neuroscience
  • Genetic contributors to risk of schizophrenia in the presence of a 22q11.2 deletion, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Cell-type-specific profiling of human cellular models of fragile X syndrome reveal PI3K-dependent defects in translation and neurogenesis, 2021, Cell Reports
  • Deep phenotyping in 3q29 deletion syndrome: recommendations for clinical care, 2021, Genetics in Medicine
  • A normative chart for cognitive development in a genetically selected population, 2021, Neuropsychopharmacology

Throughout their career, Stephen T. Warren received several honors including:

  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2020
  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2015
  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011

Best Publications

  • Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome

    Annemiske J.M.H. Verkerk;Maura Pieretti;James S. Sutcliffe;Ying-Hui Fu

  • Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox.

    Ying-Hui Fu;Derek P.A. Kuhl;Antonio Pizzuti;Maura Pieretti

  • The mGluR theory of fragile X mental retardation

    Mark F Bear;Kimberly M Huber;Stephen T Warren

  • Absence of expression of the FMR-1 gene in fragile X syndrome.

    Maura Pieretti;Fuping Zhang;Ying-Hui Fu;Stephen T. Warren

  • Altered synaptic plasticity in a mouse model of fragile X mental retardation

    Kimberly M. Huber;Kimberly M. Huber;Sean M. Gallagher;Stephen T. Warren;Mark F. Bear

  • Microarray Identification of FMRP-Associated Brain mRNAs and Altered mRNA Translational Profiles in Fragile X Syndrome

    Victoria Brown;Victoria Brown;Peng Jin;Peng Jin;Stephanie Ceman;Stephanie Ceman;Jennifer C. Darnell

  • Fragile X Syndrome: Loss of Local mRNA Regulation Alters Synaptic Development and Function

    Gary J. Bassell;Stephen T. Warren

  • Mapping of DNA instability at the fragile X to a trinucleotide repeat sequence p(CCG)n.

    EJ Kremer;M Pritchard;M Lynch;S Yu

  • Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein Targets G Quartet mRNAs Important for Neuronal Function

    Jennifer C. Darnell;Kirk B. Jensen;Peng Jin;Victoria Brown

  • Fragile X genotype characterized by an unstable region of DNA

    S. Yu;M. Pritchard;E. Kremer;M. Lynch

  • FMR1 protein: conserved RNP family domains and selective RNA binding

    Claude T. Ashley;Keith D. Wilkinson;Daniel Reines;Stephen T. Warren

  • DNA methylation represses FMR-1 transcription in fragile X syndrome

    Sutcliffe Js;Nelson Dl;Zhang F;Pieretti M

  • Biochemical and genetic interaction between the fragile X mental retardation protein and the microRNA pathway

    Peng Jin;Daniela C Zarnescu;Stephanie Ceman;Stephanie Ceman;Mika Nakamoto

  • A mutation in human CMP-sialic acid hydroxylase occurred after the Homo-Pan divergence

    Hsun Hua Chou;Hiromu Takematsu;Sandra Diaz;Jane Iber

  • Molecular Mechanisms of Fragile X Syndrome: A Twenty-Year Perspective

    Michael R. Santoro;Steven M. Bray;Stephen T. Warren

  • Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein: Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling and Association with Somatodendritic Ribosomes

    Yue Feng;Claire-Anne Gutekunst;Derek E. Eberhart;Hong Yi

  • FMRP Associates with Polyribosomes as an mRNP, and the I304N Mutation of Severe Fragile X Syndrome Abolishes This Association

    Yue Feng;Devin Absher;Derek E Eberhart;Victoria Brown

  • Reduced FMRP and increased FMR1 transcription is proportionally associated with CGG repeat number in intermediate-length and premutation carriers

    Aileen Kenneson;Fuping Zhang;Curt H. Hagedorn;Stephen T. Warren

  • A decade of molecular studies of fragile X syndrome.

    William T. O'Donnell;Stephen T. Warren

  • TRINUCLEOTIDE REPEAT EXPANSION AND HUMAN DISEASE

    Claude T. Ashley;Stephen T. Warren

Frequent Co-Authors

David L. Nelson
David L. Nelson Baylor College of Medicine
Peng Jin
Peng Jin Emory University
Gary J. Bassell
Gary J. Bassell Emory University
Michael P. Epstein
Michael P. Epstein Emory University
James S. Sutcliffe
James S. Sutcliffe Vanderbilt University
Stephanie L. Sherman
Stephanie L. Sherman Emory University
Ben A. Oostra
Ben A. Oostra Erasmus University Rotterdam
Beverly S. Emanuel
Beverly S. Emanuel Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
David J. Cutler
David J. Cutler Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in genetics can open doors to a wide range of careers in healthcare and research. Many students choose to complement their genetics studies with online degrees or certifications in related fields. This approach not only enhances career flexibility but also fits well into busy schedules.

Nurses looking to advance their education may be interested in online rn to bsn programs no clinicals, which provide a flexible, theory-based pathway without the need for on-site clinical rotations. For those aiming for advanced practice roles, exploring the shortest dnp program online can be an efficient way to earn a terminal nursing degree.

Those interested in entering the medical field quickly might consider the fastest medical assistant program. These accelerated options allow for rapid entry into healthcare support roles. For working professionals, the easiest online dnp programs can help balance rigorous study with other commitments.

Each of these pathways can complement genetics qualifications, helping students build a multidisciplinary skill set that is highly valued in the evolving landscape of healthcare and biomedical research.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen T. Warren

Recently Published Articles