World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
5432
World Ranking
13932
National Ranking
888

Stephen A. Jarvis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen A. Jarvis sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 283 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Stephen A. Jarvis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen A. Jarvis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen A. Jarvis is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research predominantly falls within the field of Engineering, with a particular focus on Global and Planetary Change, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, and Signal Processing.

The scientist's work covers several main research topics including Climate Change Policy and Economics, Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and Climate Change Governance, Plasma Diagnostics and Applications, Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics, Complex Network Analysis Techniques, and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks.

Notable recent publications include:

  • "Developing an Unsupervised Real-Time Anomaly Detection Scheme for Time Series With Multi-Seasonality," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
  • "Should I Stay Or Should I Go? The importance of electricity rate design for household defection from the power grid," 2020, Applied Energy
  • "The Economic Costs of NIMBYism: Evidence from Renewable Energy Projects," 2024, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
  • "EMPIRE-PIC: A Performance Portable Unstructured Particle-in-Cell Code," 2021, Communications in Computational Physics
  • "Elementary effects analysis of factors controlling COVID-19 infections in computational simulation reveals the importance of social distancing and mask usage," 2021, Computers in Biology and Medicine

Stephen A. Jarvis frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Matthew Tyler Bettencourt, Dominic Brown, Steven A. Wright, John P. Jones, and Giannis Moutsinas, with each coauthor appearing in multiple joint publications.

They have published research in a variety of venues, with multiple articles in:

  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
  • Applied Energy
  • Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
  • Communications in Computational Physics

Best Publications

  • GridFlow: workflow management for grid computing

    Junwei Cao;S.A. Jarvis;S. Saini;G.R. Nudd

  • Grid load balancing using intelligent agents

    Junwei Cao;Daniel P. Spooner;Stephen A. Jarvis;Graham R. Nudd

  • Connectivity-Guaranteed and Obstacle-Adaptive Deployment Schemes for Mobile Sensor Networks

    Guang Tan;S.A. Jarvis;A.-M. Kermarrec

  • ARMS: An agent-based resource management system for grid computing

    Junwei Cao;Stephen A. Jarvis;Subhash Saini;Darren J. Kerbyson

  • SAFA: A Semi-Asynchronous Protocol for Fast Federated Learning With Low Overhead

    Wentai Wu;Ligang He;Weiwei Lin;Rui Mao

  • Exploring SIMD for Molecular Dynamics, Using Intel® Xeon® Processors and Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessors

    S. J. Pennycook;C. J. Hughes;M. Smelyanskiy;S. A. Jarvis

  • Local grid scheduling techniques using performance prediction

    Daniel P. Spooner;Stephen A. Jarvis;J. Cao;S. Saini

  • Agent-based grid load balancing using performance-driven task scheduling

    Junwei Cao;D.P. Spooner;S.A. Jarvis;S. Saini

  • Performance prediction and its use in parallel and distributed computing systems

    S.A. Jarvis;D.P. Spooner;H.N.L.C. Keung;G.R. Nudd

  • Concurrent Systems: Formal Development in CSP

    Michael G. Hinchey;Stephen A. Jarvis

  • Accelerating Hydrocodes with OpenACC, OpeCL and CUDA

    J. A. Herdman;W. P. Gaudin;S. McIntosh-Smith;M. Boulton

  • Agent-based Resource Management for Grid Computing

    Junwei Cao;D. Spooner;J.D. Turner;S. Jarvis

  • A spatial analysis of proximate greenspace and mental wellbeing in London

    Victoria Houlden;João Porto de Albuquerque;Scott Weich;Stephen A. Jarvis

  • Improving the Fault Resilience of Overlay Multicast for Media Streaming

    G. Tan;S.A. Jarvis

  • Performance analysis of a hybrid MPI/CUDA implementation of the NASLU benchmark

    S. J. Pennycook;S. D. Hammond;S. A. Jarvis;G. R. Mudalige

  • Performance-Aware Workflow Management for Grid Computing

    D. P. Spooner;J. Cao;S. A. Jarvis;L. He

  • Dynamic Scheduling of Parallel Jobs with QoS Demands in Multiclusters and Grids

    Ligang He;Stephen A. Jarvis;Daniel P. Spooner;Xinuo Chen

  • A Payment-based Incentive and Service Differentiation Mechanism for Peer-to-Peer Streaming Broadcast

    Guang Tan;Stephen Jarvis

  • Allocating non-real-time and soft real-time jobs in multiclusters

    L. He;S.A. Jarvis;D.P. Spooner;H. Jiang

  • An investigation of the performance portability of OpenCL

    S. J. Pennycook;S. D. Hammond;S. A. Wright;J. A. Herdman

  • A Payment-Based Incentive and Service Differentiation Scheme for Peer-to-Peer Streaming Broadcast

    Guang Tan;S.A. Jarvis

  • WARPP: a toolkit for simulating high-performance parallel scientific codes

    S. D. Hammond;G. R. Mudalige;J. A. Smith;S. A. Jarvis

Frequent Co-Authors

Weisi Guo
Weisi Guo Cranfield University
Michael Luck
Michael Luck University of Sussex
Rob Procter
Rob Procter University of Warwick
Ahmed Al-Dubai
Ahmed Al-Dubai Edinburgh Napier University
Azzedine Boukerche
Azzedine Boukerche University of Ottawa
John F. Peden
John F. Peden GenPAx AG
Kenli Li
Kenli Li Hunan University
Geyong Min
Geyong Min University of Exeter
Suhaib A. Fahmy
Suhaib A. Fahmy King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many related fields that offer flexible online learning opportunities. Students interested in leveraging their analytical skills might consider data science programs. These programs provide practical training in handling big data and analytics—skills highly valued in today’s job market.

For those drawn to the hardware side of technology, pursuing online electrical engineering courses USA can be a smart move. These courses are accessible remotely, allowing students to balance studies with other commitments while gaining expertise in a high-demand field.

If you’re looking to quickly boost your qualifications, there are several certificate programs that pay well. These certifications typically require less time than a traditional degree and can help you enter lucrative technical roles sooner.

Additionally, those eager to accelerate their career advancement may consider the fastest online master's degree options. These programs allow you to earn an advanced credential efficiently, making it easier to stay competitive in a rapidly evolving technology landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen A. Jarvis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles