World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
119
Citations
47231
World Ranking
3918
National Ranking
2143

William J. Feuer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Feuer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 713 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William J. Feuer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Feuer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

William J. Feuer is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States. Their published work primarily falls within the field of medicine, with a focus on ophthalmology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, public health, molecular biology, and pathology and forensic medicine. Ophthalmology constitutes the largest portion of their research contributions.

The scientist's research topics emphasize various aspects of retinal and ocular health. These topics include:

  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions
  • Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • Retinal Development and Disorders

William J. Feuer has published extensively in several journals, with frequent publications in:

  • American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Ophthalmology
  • Ophthalmology Retina
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
  • UNC Libraries

The scientist has coauthored multiple papers with several frequent collaborators including:

  • Philip J. Rosenfeld
  • Giovanni Gregori
  • Yingying Shi
  • Steven J. Gedde
  • Mengxi Shen

Some of their recent published papers include:

  • Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 5 Years of Follow-up, 2022, Ophthalmology
  • Correlations Between Choriocapillaris and Choroidal Measurements and the Growth of Geographic Atrophy Using Swept Source OCT Imaging, 2020, American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Persistent Hypertransmission Defects Detected on En Face Swept Source Optical Computed Tomography Images Predict the Formation of Geographic Atrophy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration, 2021, American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Multidisease Deep Learning Neural Network for the Diagnosis of Corneal Diseases, 2021, American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Persistent Hypertransmission Defects on En Face OCT Imaging as a Stand-Alone Precursor for the Future Formation of Geographic Atrophy, 2021, Ophthalmology Retina

Best Publications

  • An optical coherence tomography-guided, variable dosing regimen with intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

    Anne E. Fung;Geeta A. Lalwani;Philip J. Rosenfeld;Sander R. Dubovy

  • Treatment outcomes in the tube versus trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up

    Steven J. Gedde;Joyce C. Schiffman;William J. Feuer;Leon W. Herndon

  • A variable-dosing regimen with intravitreal ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: year 2 of the PrONTO Study.

    Geeta A. Lalwani;Philip J. Rosenfeld;Anne E. Fung;Sander R. Dubovy

  • Postoperative complications in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study during five years of follow-up.

    Steven J. Gedde;Leon W. Herndon;James D. Brandt;Donald L. Budenz

  • Evaluation of Subjective Assessments and Objective Diagnostic Tests for Diagnosing Tear-Film Disorders Known to Cause Ocular Irritation

    Stephen C. Pflugfelder;Scheffer C.G. Tseng;Olga Sanabria;Hans Kell

  • Gene therapy for leber congenital amaurosis caused by RPE65 mutations: safety and efficacy in 15 children and adults followed up to 3 years

    Samuel G. Jacobson;Artur V. Cideciyan;Ramakrishna Ratnakaram;Elise Heon

  • Short-term safety and efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

    Ryan M. Rich;Philip J. Rosenfeld;Carmen A. Puliafito;Sander R. Dubovy

  • Visual Function and Quality of Life Among Patients With Glaucoma

    Richard K. Parrish;Steven J. Gedde;Ingrid U. Scott;William J. Feuer

  • Novel method for analyzing snellen visual acuity measurements.

    Ninel Z Gregori;William Feuer;Philip J Rosenfeld

  • Macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer: automated detection and thickness reproducibility with spectral domain-optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.

    Jean Claude Mwanza;Jonathan D. Oakley;Donald L. Budenz;Robert T. Chang;Robert T. Chang

  • Three-Year Follow-up of the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study

    Steven J. Gedde;Joyce C. Schiffman;William J. Feuer;Leon W. Herndon

  • Long-term outcome of keratolimbal allograft with or without penetrating keratoplasty for total limbal stem cell deficiency

    Abraham Solomon;Pierre Ellies;David F. Anderson;Amel Touhami

  • A Cohort Study of Transcutaneous Oxygen Tension and the Incidence and Severity of Retinopathy of Prematurity

    John T. Flynn;Eduardo Bancalari;Ellen Sim Snyder;Ronald N. Goldberg

  • Treatment outcomes in the tube versus trabeculectomy study after one year of follow-up.

    Steven J. Gedde;Joyce C. Schiffman;William J. Feuer;Leon W. Herndon

  • Quality of life of low-vision patients and the impact of low-vision services

    Ingrid U Scott;William E Smiddy;Joyce Schiffman;William J Feuer

  • Surgical complications in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study during the first year of follow-up.

    Steven J. Gedde;Leon W. Herndon;James D. Brandt;Donald L. Budenz

  • Internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery.

    William E Smiddy;William Feuer;Ghassan Cordahi

  • Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy, Ab Interno Trabeculotomy: Technique Report and Preliminary Results

    Davinder S. Grover;David G. Godfrey;Oluwatosin Smith;William J. Feuer

  • Reproducibility of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Thickness Measurements with Stratus OCT in Glaucomatous Eyes

    Donald L. Budenz;Marie Josée Fredette;Marie Josée Fredette;William J. Feuer;Douglas R. Anderson

  • Reproducibility of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Optic Nerve Head Parameters Measured with Cirrus HD-OCT in Glaucomatous Eyes

    Jean Claude Mwanza;Robert T. Chang;Donald L. Budenz;Mary K. Durbin

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip J. Rosenfeld
Philip J. Rosenfeld University of Miami
William E. Smiddy
William E. Smiddy University of Miami
Harry W. Flynn
Harry W. Flynn University of Miami
Ingrid U. Scott
Ingrid U. Scott Pennsylvania State University
Wei Shi
Wei Shi University of Miami
Janet L. Davis
Janet L. Davis University of Miami
Ruikang K. Wang
Ruikang K. Wang University of Washington
Carmen A. Puliafito
Carmen A. Puliafito University of Southern California
Stephen C. Pflugfelder
Stephen C. Pflugfelder Baylor College of Medicine
Srinivas R. Sadda
Srinivas R. Sadda University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens the door to a variety of related degrees and healthcare careers—many now available through flexible online study. For those seeking healthcare leadership roles, a mha degree cost is a key concern when comparing master’s in healthcare administration programs. Fortunately, several universities offer quality options at lower prices, empowering more future administrators to join the field.

Advanced practice is also growing fast. Nurses seeking to elevate their profession may look for the cheapest dnp programs online, making the ultimate nursing credential more accessible. Pharmacists can now accelerate their studies with a 3 year online pharmd—ideal for career advancement without a lengthy time commitment.

Lastly, with healthcare technology booming, many consider healthcare informatics degree programs for roles in data, technology, and administration. These programs provide a modern skillset in a cost-effective online format, preparing graduates for the evolving medical landscape.

Best Scientists Citing William J. Feuer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles