World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 70 778 680 147 131 286 16178

Amanda Sacker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amanda Sacker between 1990 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amanda Sacker published across 35 years, from 1990 to 2024, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2013. 11 of the 296 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2013. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications
1990 2024

296 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amanda Sacker: publications per year, 1990 to 2024
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 3
1994 1
1995 6
1996 3
1997 0
1998 1
1999 2
2000 3
2001 3
2002 4
2003 6
2004 3
2005 5
2006 9
2007 14
2008 8
2009 12
2010 20
2011 20
2012 14
2013 26
2014 7
2015 11
2016 25
2017 26
2018 11
2019 8
2020 10
2021 16
2022 6
2023 5
2024 6
Total 296
Download as CSV

Amanda Sacker publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Sacker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 284–293 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 286 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113 286
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Amanda Sacker D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Sacker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43 70
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Amanda Sacker is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of social sciences, with particular focus on sociology, clinical psychology, demography, and health-related disciplines. Their scholarly work spans across topics such as health disparities and outcomes, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, employment and welfare studies, retirement and disability employment issues, child welfare and adoption, autism spectrum disorder research, and family and disability support research.

Their recent notable papers include:

  • Association of childhood out-of-home care status with all-cause mortality up to 42-years later: Office of National Statistics Longitudinal Study, 2020, BMC Public Health
  • Timing of diagnosis, depression and self-harm in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder, 2020, Autism
  • Mental health and social difficulties of late-diagnosed autistic children, across childhood and adolescence, 2022, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Determinants of an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis in childhood and adolescence: Evidence from the UK Millennium Cohort Study, 2020, Autism
  • Mental distress among young adults in Great Britain: long-term trends and early changes during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2021, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Amanda Sacker collaborates frequently with a core group of co-authors, including:

  • Anne McMunn
  • Rebecca Lacey
  • Emily Murray
  • Aswathikutty Gireesh
  • Dorina Cadar

Their publications have appeared most often in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Autism
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Advances in Life Course Research

Amanda Sacker's research covers several subfields of study, prominently sociology and political science, clinical psychology, demography, general health professions, and health. Their investigations frequently address social and health outcomes connected to vulnerable populations, including those on the autism spectrum and children in care systems.

Best Publications

  • Social Media Use and Adolescent Mental Health: Findings From the UK Millennium Cohort Study

    Yvonne Kelly;Afshin Zilanawala;Cara Booker;Amanda Sacker

  • Childhood antecedents of schizophrenia and affective illness: social adjustment at ages 7 and 11.

    D J Done;T J Crow;E C Johnstone;A Sacker

  • Breastfeeding and Hospitalization for Diarrheal and Respiratory Infection in the United Kingdom Millennium Cohort Study

    Maria A Quigley;Yvonne J Kelly;Amanda Sacker

  • Lifetime Antecedents of Cognitive Reserve

    Marcus Richards;Amanda Sacker

  • The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A meta confirmatory factor analysis

    Sam Norton;Theodore Cosco;Frank Doyle;John Done

  • Early Maternal Time Investment and Early Child Outcomes

    Emilia Del Bono;Marco Francesconi;Yvonne Kelly;Amanda Sacker

  • Social inequalities in self reported health in early old age: follow-up of prospective cohort study

    Tarani Chandola;Jane Ferrie;Amanda Sacker;Michael Marmot

  • Breastfeeding is associated with improved child cognitive development: a population-based cohort study.

    Maria A. Quigley;Christine Hockley;Claire Carson;Yvonne Kelly

  • Employment status, employment conditions, and limiting illness: prospective evidence from the British household panel survey 1991–2001

    M Bartley;A Sacker;P Clarke

  • Social inequality in educational achievement and psychosocial adjustment throughout childhood: magnitude and mechanisms.

    Amanda Sacker;Ingrid Schoon;Mel Bartley

  • Gender differences in the associations between age trends of social media interaction and well-being among 10-15 year olds in the UK

    Cara L. Booker;Yvonne J. Kelly;Amanda Sacker

  • Childhood precursors of psychosis as clues to its evolutionary origins.

    T J Crow;D J Done;A Sacker

  • The Influence of Context, Timing, and Duration of Risk Experiences for the Passage from Childhood to Midadulthood

    Ingrid Schoon;John Bynner;Heather Joshi;Samantha Parsons

  • Age trajectories of quality of life among older adults: results from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

    Paola Zaninotto;Emanuela Falaschetti;Amanda Sacker;Amanda Sacker

  • Pathways to obesity: identifying local, modifiable determinants of physical activity and diet.

    Mai Stafford;Steven Cummins;Anne Ellaway;Amanda Sacker

  • Light drinking in pregnancy, a risk for behavioural problems and cognitive deficits at 3 years of age?

    Yvonne Kelly;Amanda Sacker;Ron Gray;John Kelly

  • Health selection in the Whitehall II study, UK.

    Tarani Chandola;Mel Bartley;Amanda Sacker;Crispin Jenkinson

  • Associations between active commuting, body fat, and body mass index: population based, cross sectional study in the United Kingdom

    Ellen Flint;Steven Cummins;Amanda Sacker

  • Socioeconomic adversity, educational resilience and subsequent levels of adult adaptation

    Ingrid Schoon;Samantha Parsons;Amanda Sacker

  • Comparing health inequality in men and women: prospective study of mortality 1986-96

    Amanda Sacker;David Firth;Ray Fitzpatrick;Kevin Lynch

  • Lifetime antecedents of cognitive reserve

    M Richards;A Sacker;IJ Deary

Frequent Co-Authors

Yvonne Kelly
Yvonne Kelly University College London
Mel Bartley
Mel Bartley University College London
Anne McMunn
Anne McMunn University College London
Ingrid Schoon
Ingrid Schoon University College London
Meena Kumari
Meena Kumari University of Essex
Sam Norton
Sam Norton King's College London
Michael Marmot
Michael Marmot University College London
James Nazroo
James Nazroo University of Manchester
Karen Glaser
Karen Glaser King's College London
Tarani Chandola
Tarani Chandola University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities. Many students choose to study online, taking advantage of flexible and affordable programs to start or advance careers in counseling, psychology, and social work.

Those interested in counseling should consider cacrep-accredited programs, which ensure your degree meets key industry standards—a major advantage for career readiness and licensure. For those drawn to supporting families, pursuing marriage and family therapy online programs accredited is an excellent pathway. These specialized degrees train graduates to address family dynamics and mental health in a professional context.

If you are passionate about understanding cognition and behavior, a psychology degree online offers broad foundations for roles in human resources, counseling, or even research. For aspiring social workers seeking a streamlined application process, the easiest msw program routes can make entry into this vital field more accessible.

Each online degree opens doors to meaningful, people-centered careers—empowering you to make a difference in society while enjoying the flexibility of remote study.

Best Scientists Citing Amanda Sacker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles