World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tarani Chandola

Tarani Chandola

Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
China
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 69 806 702 11 10 225 20811

Tarani Chandola publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tarani Chandola between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tarani Chandola published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2010. 17 of the 248 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2010. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 13 publications
1998 2025

248 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tarani Chandola: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 2
2000 7
2001 5
2002 5
2003 5
2004 6
2005 6
2006 10
2007 15
2008 4
2009 13
2010 19
2011 10
2012 10
2013 8
2014 6
2015 15
2016 12
2017 14
2018 11
2019 7
2020 6
2021 16
2022 8
2023 10
2024 4
2025 13
Total 248
Download as CSV

Tarani Chandola publications per year - data summary

  • Tarani Chandola, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Hong Kong, has 248 publications recorded across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1998 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2010, with 19 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1998, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 8.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.9 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 51 publications, 21% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1998-2007: 62 publications (6.2 per year); 2008-2017: 111 publications (11.1 per year); 2018-2025: 75 publications (9.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Tarani Chandola publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tarani Chandola sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 224–233 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 225 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213 225
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Tarani Chandola publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Tarani Chandola, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Hong Kong, records 225 publications - the 73rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 73% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Tarani Chandola, and about 27% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Tarani Chandola ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Tarani Chandola D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tarani Chandola sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40 69
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Tarani Chandola D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Tarani Chandola, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Hong Kong, records 69 D-Index - the 90th percentile of the discipline.
  • 90% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Tarani Chandola, and about 10% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Tarani Chandola ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in China Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in China Leader Award
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Tarani Chandola is affiliated with the University of Hong Kong in China. Their research interests span multiple fields within social sciences, health professions, and psychology. They have contributed extensively to areas such as general health professions, demography, clinical psychology, and sociology and political science.

The scientist's work covers a variety of main topics, including:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Employment and welfare studies
  • Workplace health and well-being
  • COVID-19 and mental health
  • Migration, aging, and tourism studies
  • Retirement, disability, and employment
  • Psychological well-being and life satisfaction

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Tarani Chandola are:

  • The mental health impact of COVID-19 and lockdown-related stressors among adults in the UK, 2020, Psychological Medicine
  • The longitudinal relationship between loneliness, social isolation, and frailty in older adults in England: a prospective analysis, 2021, The Lancet Healthy Longevity
  • Frailty among Older Adults and Its Distribution in England, 2021, The Journal of Frailty & Aging
  • The validity of the residuals approach to measuring resilience to adverse childhood experiences, 2022, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Genetic Variants Associated With Resilience in Human and Animal Studies, 2022, Frontiers in Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Chandola include:

  • Neil Pendleton
  • Peter Bower
  • Patrick Rouxel
  • Meena Kumari
  • Asri Maharani

Publication venues where Chandola has appeared multiple times include:

  • Age and Ageing
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
  • Social Science & Medicine

Chandola has also contributed to book publications with Springer International Publishing, including the 2023 title "Handbook of Life Course Occupational Health."

Recognition for Chandola's work includes being named a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons.

    Johannes Siegrist;Dagmar Starke;Tarani Chandola;Isabelle Godin

  • Chronic stress at work and the metabolic syndrome: prospective study

    Tarani Chandola;Eric Brunner;Michael Marmot

  • Patients’ experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care

    Crispin Jenkinson;A. Coulter;S. Bruster;N. Richards

  • Work stress and coronary heart disease: what are the mechanisms?

    Tarani Chandola;Annie Britton;Eric Brunner;Harry Hemingway

  • Association between fear of crime and mental health and physical functioning.

    Mai Stafford;Tarani Chandola;Michael Marmot

  • Prospective Effect of Job Strain on General and Central Obesity in the Whitehall II Study

    Eric J. Brunner;Tarani Chandola;Michael G. Marmot

  • Validating self-rated health in different ethnic groups.

    Tarani Chandola;Crispin Jenkinson

  • Psychophysiological biomarkers of workplace stressors

    Tarani Chandola;Alexandros Heraclides;Meena Kumari

  • Social Gradients in Oral and General Health

    Wael Sabbah;G Tsakos;T Chandola;A Sheiham

  • Psychosocial Stress at Work Doubles the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Middle-Aged Women: Evidence from the Whitehall II Study

    Alexandros Heraclides;Tarani Chandola;Daniel R. Witte;Eric J. Brunner

  • The Effect of Short Sleep Duration on Coronary Heart Disease Risk is Greatest Among Those with Sleep Disturbance: A Prospective Study from the Whitehall II Cohort

    Tarani Chandola;Jane E. Ferrie;Aleksander Perski;Tasnime Akbaraly;Tasnime Akbaraly

  • Social inequalities in self reported health in early old age: follow-up of prospective cohort study

    Tarani Chandola;Jane Ferrie;Amanda Sacker;Michael Marmot

  • Socioeconomic trajectories across the life course and health outcomes in midlife: evidence for the accumulation hypothesis?

    Archana Singh-Manoux;Jane E Ferrie;Tarani Chandola;Michael Marmot

  • Does conflict between home and work explain the effect of multiple roles on mental health? A comparative study of Finland, Japan, and the UK

    Tarani Chandola;Pekka Martikainen;Mel Bartley;Eero Lahelma

  • Socio-demographic predictors of quitting smoking: How important are household factors?

    Tarani Chandola;Jenny Head;Mel Bartley

  • Unfairness and health: evidence from the Whitehall II Study

    Roberto De Vogli;Jane E Ferrie;Tarani Chandola;Mika Kivimäki

  • Self-Reported Sleep Duration and Sleep Disturbance Are Independently Associated with Cortisol Secretion in the Whitehall II Study

    Meena Kumari;Ellena Badrick;Jane Ferrie;Aleksander Perski

  • The fear of crime and area differences in health.

    Tarani Chandola

  • Childhood IQ in relation to obesity and weight gain in adult life: the National Child Development (1958) Study.

    T Chandola;I J Deary;D Blane;G D Batty;G D Batty

  • Negative aspects of close relationships and heart disease.

    Roberto De Vogli;Tarani Chandola;Michael Gideon Marmot

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Marmot
Michael Marmot University College London
Mika Kivimäki
Mika Kivimäki University College London
Pekka Martikainen
Pekka Martikainen University of Helsinki
Meena Kumari
Meena Kumari University of Essex
Eero Lahelma
Eero Lahelma University of Helsinki
Eric J. Brunner
Eric J. Brunner University College London
Jane E. Ferrie
Jane E. Ferrie University College London
Laia Bécares
Laia Bécares King's College London
Stephen Stansfeld
Stephen Stansfeld Queen Mary University of London
James Nazroo
James Nazroo University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancements in online education have created a range of flexible pathways for those interested in Social Sciences and Humanities. Students can now begin or advance their careers through fully online, accredited programs designed to fit busy lifestyles and diverse learning goals.

Those interested in mental health and human behavior may explore psychology masters programs, which can open doors to counseling, therapy, and research roles. For educators seeking leadership positions, enrolling in easiest edd programs offers a streamlined path to earning a high-level degree without unnecessary delays.

Students wanting to fast-track their education might consider 1 year master's programs or even choose an accelerated online degree to enter the workforce more quickly. These options are particularly valuable for career-changers, working professionals, or anyone balancing multiple commitments.

With a wide variety of online degrees now available, students can find programs that are both affordable and efficient, making it easier to pursue meaningful roles in education, social work, psychology, and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Tarani Chandola

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles