World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
8676
World Ranking
8297
National Ranking
3558

Piotr Luszczek publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piotr Luszczek sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 260 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Piotr Luszczek D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piotr Luszczek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Piotr Luszczek is affiliated with the University of Tennessee at Knoxville in the United States. Their research contributions primarily focus on areas within computer science, particularly in computational theory, mathematics, and the broader fields of high-performance and parallel computing.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science

Subfields of study cover a range of topics including:

  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems and Management

The main topics addressed in their work involve:

  • Matrix Theory and Algorithms
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Numerical Methods and Algorithms
  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Polynomial and algebraic computation

Piotr Luszczek has been actively involved in multiple publication venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications
  • ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software
  • Parallel Computing
  • IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems

Their recent papers include:

  • "A survey of numerical linear algebra methods utilizing mixed-precision arithmetic," 2021, The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications
  • "OpenMP application experiences: Porting to accelerated nodes," 2021, Parallel Computing
  • "A Set of Batched Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms and LAPACK Routines," 2021, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software
  • "A Survey of Numerical Methods Utilizing Mixed Precision Arithmetic," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Accelerating Restarted GMRES With Mixed Precision Arithmetic," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems

Piotr Luszczek has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Jack Dongarra
  • Mark Gates
  • Jeremy Kepner
  • Hayden Jananthan
  • William Arcand

The scientist has also contributed to multiple book publications with Springer Science+Business Media, including:

  • High Performance Computing, 2021
  • High Performance Computing, 2021
  • High Performance Computing. ISC High Performance 2022 International Workshops, 2022
  • Supercomputing Frontiers, 2022

Best Publications

  • The LINPACK Benchmark: past, present and future

    Jack J. Dongarra;Piotr Luszczek;Antoine Petitet

  • Numerical linear algebra on emerging architectures: The PLASMA and MAGMA projects

    Emmanuel Agullo;Jim Demmel;Jack Dongarra;Bilel Hadri

  • From CUDA to OpenCL: Towards a performance-portable solution for multi-platform GPU programming

    Peng Du;Rick Weber;Piotr Luszczek;Stanimire Tomov

  • The HPC Challenge (HPCC) benchmark suite

    Piotr R Luszczek;David H Bailey;Jack J Dongarra;Jeremy Kepner

  • Accelerating Scientific Computations with Mixed Precision Algorithms

    Marc Baboulin;Alfredo Buttari;Jack J. Dongarra;Jack J. Dongarra;Jack J. Dongarra;Jakub Kurzak

  • Measuring Energy and Power with PAPI

    Vincent M. Weaver;Matt Johnson;Kiran Kasichayanula;James Ralph

  • Introduction to the HPC Challenge Benchmark Suite

    Piotr Luszczek;Jack J. Dongarra;David Koester;Rolf Rabenseifner

  • High-performance conjugate-gradient benchmark

    Jack Dongarra;Michael A Heroux;Piotr Luszczek

  • Flexible Development of Dense Linear Algebra Algorithms on Massively Parallel Architectures with DPLASMA

    George Bosilca;Aurelien Bouteiller;Anthony Danalis;Mathieu Faverge

  • Exploiting the performance of 32 bit floating point arithmetic in obtaining 64 bit accuracy (revisiting iterative refinement for linear systems)

    Julie Langou;Julien Langou;Piotr Luszczek;Jakub Kurzak

  • Mixed Precision Iterative Refinement Techniques for the Solution of Dense Linear Systems

    Alfredo Buttari;Jack Dongarra;Julie Langou;Julien Langou

  • The impact of multicore on math software

    Alfredo Buttari;Jack Dongarra;Jakub Kurzak;Julien Langou

  • Introduction to the HPCChallenge Benchmark Suite

    Jack J. Dongarra;Piotr Luszczek

  • HPCG Benchmark: a New Metric for Ranking High Performance Computing Systems

    Jack Dongarra;Michael A. Heroux;Piotr Luszczek

  • Accelerating Numerical Dense Linear Algebra Calculations with GPUs

    Jack J. Dongarra;Jack J. Dongarra;Jack J. Dongarra;Mark Gates;Azzam Haidar;Jakub Kurzak

  • Using Mixed Precision for Sparse Matrix Computations to Enhance the Performance while Achieving 64-bit Accuracy

    Alfredo Buttari;Jack Dongarra;Jakub Kurzak;Piotr Luszczek

  • A survey of numerical linear algebra methods utilizing mixed-precision arithmetic:

    Ahmad Abdelfattah;Hartwig Anzt;Hartwig Anzt;Erik G. Boman;Erin C. Carson

  • Power Aware Computing on GPUs

    Kiran Kasichayanula;Dan Terpstra;Piotr Luszczek;Stan Tomov

  • The Singular Value Decomposition: Anatomy of Optimizing an Algorithm for Extreme Scale

    Jack J. Dongarra;Mark Gates;Azzam Haidar;Jakub Kurzak

  • Self-adapting software for numerical linear algebra and LAPACK for clusters

    Zizhong Chen;Jack Dongarra;Piotr Luszczek;Kenneth Roche

  • Exploiting the Performance of 32 bit Floating Point Arithmetic in Obtaining 64 bit Accuracy

    Julie Langou;Julien Langou;Piotr Luszczek;Jakub Kurzak

  • PLASMA: Parallel Linear Algebra Software for Multicore Using OpenMP

    Jack Dongarra;Mark Gates;Azzam Haidar;Jakub Kurzak

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack Dongarra
Jack Dongarra University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Jakub Kurzak
Jakub Kurzak Advanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Stanimire Tomov
Stanimire Tomov University of Tennessee at Knoxville
George Bosilca
George Bosilca University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Thomas Herault
Thomas Herault University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Michael A. Heroux
Michael A. Heroux Sandia National Laboratories
Jeffrey S. Vetter
Jeffrey S. Vetter Oak Ridge National Laboratory
James Demmel
James Demmel University of California, Berkeley
Barry Smith
Barry Smith Argonne National Laboratory
Nicholas J. Higham
Nicholas J. Higham University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degree options that can provide additional skills or lead to alternative career paths. Beyond traditional computer science courses, students often consider programs that build business or organizational expertise.

For those aspiring to leadership roles, pursuing one of the best online executive MBA programs can provide essential management and decision-making skills. If your interests align with information management rather than strictly coding, you might explore a library science degree, which covers digital archiving and information systems.

Cost is a major factor for many students. Researching affordable graduate school options helps ensure you get quality education without excessive debt. For those aiming toward top-tier administrative positions or academic careers, the best online doctorate in organizational leadership program can lead to executive and educational leadership opportunities.

These degrees, when combined with computer science skills, can greatly enhance your professional versatility in the tech industry and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Piotr Luszczek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles