World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
5849
World Ranking
13904
National Ranking
5525

Thomas Herault publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Herault sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 140 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Thomas Herault D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Herault sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Herault is affiliated with the University of Tennessee at Knoxville in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science with a focus on subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Hardware and Architecture, Information Systems, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and General Health Professions.

The main topics covered in Thomas Herault's research work include:

  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Interconnection Networks and Systems
  • Age of Information Optimization

Thomas Herault has published extensively in several venues, with frequent publications in:

  • The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications
  • Future Generation Computer Systems
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing
  • Santé Publique

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Thomas Herault are:

  • "PaRSEC: Scalability, flexibility, and hybrid architecture support for task-based applications in ECP" (2024), published in The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications
  • "Overhead of using spare nodes" (2020), published in The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications
  • "Revisiting I/O bandwidth-sharing strategies for HPC applications" (2024), published in Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing
  • "A survey on checkpointing strategies: Should we always checkpoint à la Young/Daly?" (2024), published in Future Generation Computer Systems
  • "Generalized Flow-Graph Programming Using Template Task-Graphs: Initial Implementation and Assessment" (2022), published in the 2022 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Thomas Herault include:

  • George Bosilca
  • Yves Robert
  • Aurélien Bouteiller
  • Anne Benoît
  • Joseph Schuchart

Best Publications

  • DAGuE: A generic distributed DAG engine for High Performance Computing

    George Bosilca;Aurelien Bouteiller;Anthony Danalis;Thomas Herault

  • MPICH-V: Toward a Scalable Fault Tolerant MPI for Volatile Nodes

    George Bosilca;Aurelien Bouteiller;Franck Cappello;Samir Djilali

  • Approximate probabilistic model checking

    Thomas Herault;Richard Lassaigne;Frédéric Magniette;Sylvain Peyronnet

  • PaRSEC: Exploiting Heterogeneity to Enhance Scalability

    George Bosilca;Aurelien Bouteiller;Anthony Danalis;Mathieu Faverge

  • Computing on large-scale distributed systems: Xtrem Web architecture, programming models, security, tests and convergence with grid

    Franck Cappello;Samir Djilali;Gilles Fedak;Thomas Herault

  • MPICH-V2: a Fault Tolerant MPI for Volatile Nodes based on Pessimistic Sender Based Message Logging

    Aurélien Bouteiller;Franck Cappello;Thomas Herault;Géraud Krawezik

  • Post-failure recovery of MPI communication capability: Design and rationale

    Wesley Bland;Aurelien Bouteiller;Thomas Herault;George Bosilca

  • MPICH-V Project: A Multiprotocol Automatic Fault-Tolerant MPI

    A. Bouteiller;T. Herault;G. Krawezik;P. Lemarinier

  • Flexible Development of Dense Linear Algebra Algorithms on Massively Parallel Architectures with DPLASMA

    George Bosilca;Aurelien Bouteiller;Anthony Danalis;Mathieu Faverge

  • Algorithm-based fault tolerance for dense matrix factorizations

    Peng Du;Aurelien Bouteiller;George Bosilca;Thomas Herault

  • Fault-Tolerance Techniques for High-Performance Computing

    Thomas Herault;Yves Robert

  • Argobots: A Lightweight Low-Level Threading and Tasking Framework

    Sangmin Seo;Abdelhalim Amer;Pavan Balaji;Cyril Bordage

  • An evaluation of user-level failure mitigation support in MPI

    Wesley Bland;Aurelien Bouteiller;Thomas Herault;Joshua Hursey

  • Blocking vs. non-blocking coordinated checkpointing for large-scale fault tolerant MPI

    Camille Coti;Thomas Herault;Pierre Lemarinier;Laurence Pilard

  • Improved message logging versus improved coordinated checkpointing for fault tolerant MPI

    P. Lemarinier;A. Bouteiller;T. Herault;G. Krawezik

  • Blocking vs. non-blocking coordinated checkpointing for large-scale fault tolerant MPI Protocols

    Darius Buntinas;Camille Coti;Thomas Herault;Thomas Herault;Pierre Lemarinier;Pierre Lemarinier

  • Unified model for assessing checkpointing protocols at extreme-scale

    George Bosilca;Aurélien Bouteiller;Elisabeth Brunet;Franck Cappello

  • DAGuE: A Generic Distributed DAG Engine for High Performance Computing

    George Bosilca;Aurelien Bouteiller;Anthony Danalis;Thomas Herault

  • Dynamic Task Discovery in PaRSEC- A data-flow task-based Runtime

    Reazul Hoque;Thomas Herault;George Bosilca;Jack Dongarra

  • Probabilistic Model Checking of the CSMA/CD Protocol Using PRISM and APMC

    Marie Duflot;Laurent Fribourg;Thomas Herault;Richard Lassaigne

  • Algorithm-Based Fault Tolerance for Dense Matrix Factorizations, Multiple Failures and Accuracy

    Aurelien Bouteiller;Thomas Herault;George Bosilca;Peng Du

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack Dongarra
Jack Dongarra University of Tennessee at Knoxville
George Bosilca
George Bosilca University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Yves Robert
Yves Robert École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
Franck Cappello
Franck Cappello Argonne National Laboratory
Piotr Luszczek
Piotr Luszczek University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Jakub Kurzak
Jakub Kurzak Advanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Stanimire Tomov
Stanimire Tomov University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Sébastien Tixeuil
Sébastien Tixeuil Sorbonne University
Robert J. Harrison
Robert J. Harrison Murdoch University
Manish Parashar
Manish Parashar University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up new possibilities for students interested in Computer Science and related fields. For those concerned about their academic background, you can find many online schools that accept low gpa, providing opportunities for a fresh start.

If you want to enter the workforce quickly, consider an computer science accelerated program. These programs are designed to help you complete your degree faster without compromising on essential skills.

Computer science intersects with many fields, including environmental science and engineering. Curious about job prospects in related areas? Discover the wide variety of jobs for environmental science majors, which range from research and policy to tech-driven solutions.

If you are interested in sustainability and technology, you may also explore online environmental engineering degree programs. These pathways offer affordable options to combine your technical skills with the growing field of environmental engineering.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Herault

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles