World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Pierre-François Coheur

Pierre-François Coheur

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
83
Citations
22110
World Ranking
844
National Ranking
15

Pierre-François Coheur publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre-François Coheur sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 641 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Pierre-François Coheur D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre-François Coheur sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pierre-François Coheur is affiliated with the Université Libre de Bruxelles in Belgium and has contributed extensively to the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their research primarily focuses on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Spectroscopy.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics related to atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric ozone and climate, air quality monitoring and forecasting, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, air quality and health impacts, as well as spectroscopy and laser applications.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Coheur include Lieven Clarisse, Martin Van Damme, Cathy Clerbaux, Bruno Franco, and Juliette Hadji-Lazaro. These partnerships have resulted in numerous publications in well-known scientific venues.

Coheur has published extensively in leading journals, with significant contributions in:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics (17 publications)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (9 publications)
  • Geophysical Research Letters (6 publications)
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques (5 publications)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (4 publications)

Recent notable papers by Coheur include:

  • Global, regional and national trends of atmospheric ammonia derived from a decadal (2008-2018) satellite record, 2020, Environmental Research Letters
  • Air pollution trends measured from Terra: CO and AOD over industrial, fire-prone, and background regions, 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Antarctic Ozone Enhancement During the 2019 Sudden Stratospheric Warming Event, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Estimating global ammonia (NH 3) emissions based on IASI observations from 2008 to 2018, 2022, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Insights into the spatial distribution of global, national, and subnational greenhouse gas emissions in the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR v8.0), 2024, Earth system science data

Best Publications

  • Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE): Mission overview.

    P. F. Bernath;C.T. Mcelroy;M. C. Abrams;C.D. Boone

  • Monitoring of atmospheric composition using the thermal infrared IASI/METOP sounder

    Cathy Clerbaux;Cathy Clerbaux;Anne Boynard;Anne Boynard;Lieven Clarisse;Michael George

  • Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Present-day distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone relevant to climate and global atmospheric chemistry model evaluation

    A. Gaudel;O. R. Cooper;G. Ancellet;B. Barret

  • Industrial and agricultural ammonia point sources exposed.

    Martin Van Damme;Lieven Clarisse;Simon Whitburn;Juliette Hadji-Lazaro

  • The MACC reanalysis: an 8 yr data set of atmospheric composition

    A. Inness;F. Baier;A. Benedetti;I. Bouarar

  • Global ammonia distribution derived from infrared satellite observations

    Lieven Clarisse;Cathy Clerbaux;Franciscus Johannes Dentener;Daniel Hurtmans

  • Towards a climate-dependent paradigm of ammonia emission and deposition

    Mark A. Sutton;Stefan Reis;Stuart N. Riddick;Ulrike Dragosits

  • Hyperspectral Earth Observation from IASI: Five Years of Accomplishments

    Fiona Hilton;Raymond Armante;Thomas August;Chris Barnet

  • Atmospheric ammonia and particulate inorganic nitrogen over the United States

    C. L. Heald;J. L. Collett;T. Lee;K. B. Benedict

  • Decadal record of satellite carbon monoxide observations

    H. M. Worden;M. N. Deeter;C. Frankenberg;Maya George

  • Ammonia Emissions May Be Substantially Underestimated in China

    Xiuming Zhang;Yiyun Wu;Xuejun Liu;Stefan Reis

  • FORLI radiative transfer and retrieval code for IASI

    Daniel Hurtmans;Pierre-François Coheur;Catherine Wespes;Lieven Clarisse

  • Carbon monoxide distributions from the IASI/METOP mission: evaluation with other space-borne remote sensors

    Maya George;Cathy Clerbaux;Daniel Hurtmans;Solène Turquety;Solène Turquety

  • Global distributions, time series and error characterization of atmospheric ammonia (NH 3 ) from IASI satellite observations

    M. Van Damme;M. Van Damme;L. Clarisse;C. L. Heald;D. Hurtmans

  • Satellite evidence for a large source of formic acid from boreal and tropical forests

    T. Stavrakou;J.-F. Müller;J. Peeters;A. Razavi

  • The GEISA spectroscopic database: Current and future archive for Earth and planetary atmosphere studies

    N. Jacquinet-Husson;N.A. Scott;A. Chédin;L. Crépeau

  • Global, regional and national trends of atmospheric ammonia derived from a decadal (2008–2018) satellite record

    Martin Van Damme;Lieven Clarisse;Bruno Franco;Mark A Sutton

  • IASI measurements of reactive trace species in biomass burning plumes

    Pierre-François Coheur;Lieven Clarisse;Solène Turquety;Solène Turquety;Daniel Hurtmans

  • Volcanic SO 2 fluxes derived from satellite data: a survey using OMI, GOME-2, IASI and MODIS

    N. Theys;R. Campion;R. Campion;L. Clarisse;H. Brenot

  • A 3000 K laboratory emission spectrum of water

    Pierre-François Coheur;Peter F. Bernath;Michel Carleer;Reginald Colin

  • The 2003 edition of the GEISA/IASI spectroscopic database

    N. Jacquinet-Husson;N.A. Scott;A. Chédin;K. Garceran

  • Retrieval of sulphur dioxide from the infrared atmospheric sounding interferometer (IASI)

    Lieven Clarisse;Daniel Hurtmans;Cathy Clerbaux;Cathy Clerbaux;Juliette Hadji-Lazaro

  • Observations of the eruption of the Sarychev volcano and simulations using the HadGEM2 climate model.

    James M. Haywood;James M. Haywood;Andy Jones;Lieven Clarisse;Adam Bourassa

Frequent Co-Authors

Cathy Clerbaux
Cathy Clerbaux Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Daniel Hurtmans
Daniel Hurtmans Université Libre de Bruxelles
Lieven Clarisse
Lieven Clarisse Université Libre de Bruxelles
Juliette Hadji-Lazaro
Juliette Hadji-Lazaro Sorbonne University
Solène Turquety
Solène Turquety École Polytechnique
Peter F. Bernath
Peter F. Bernath Old Dominion University
Jean-François Müller
Jean-François Müller Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
Trissevgeni Stavrakou
Trissevgeni Stavrakou Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
Helen M. Worden
Helen M. Worden National Center for Atmospheric Research
Kevin W. Bowman
Kevin W. Bowman California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in environmental sciences, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career opportunities. An online geoscience degree is ideal for students who want to understand Earth's physical processes and pursue roles in natural resource management, environmental consulting, or hazard mitigation.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology is integral to many environmental science careers. Enrolling in one of the best GIS graduate programs equips students with skills to analyze spatial data, which is crucial for urban planning, conservation efforts, and disaster response.

For those aiming to influence environmental policy and public administration, completing a 1 year MPA online program provides focused leadership training and organizational expertise within government and nonprofit sectors.

Understanding human behavior and societal impacts is essential in environmental work. Pursuing the best online sociology bachelor degree can deepen insight into community challenges, helping environmental professionals design inclusive, effective solutions.

Best Scientists Citing Pierre-François Coheur

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles