World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
72
Citations
21751
World Ranking
1481
National Ranking
22

Jean-François Müller publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-François Müller sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 270 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Jean-François Müller D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-François Müller sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jean-François Müller is affiliated with the Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy in Belgium. Their research contributions focus extensively on atmospheric sciences and environmental studies, with a significant emphasis on air quality, atmospheric chemistry, and climate dynamics.

The main fields of study for Müller include Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their work spans several subfields such as Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Engineering, and Plant Science.

The topics addressed in their publications cover a range of areas, notably:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • COVID-19 impact on air quality
  • Plant responses to elevated CO2

Müller's publications have appeared frequently in several leading scientific journals, including:

  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Earth's Future
  • Nature Geoscience

The scientist has authored and coauthored numerous papers, with some notable recent works being:

  • "Impact of Coronavirus Outbreak on NO2 Pollution Assessed Using TROPOMI and OMI Observations" (2020), published in Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Intercomparison of Magnitudes and Trends in Anthropogenic Surface Emissions From Bottom-Up Inventories, Top-Down Estimates, and Emission Scenarios" (2020), published in Earth's Future
  • "Global nitrous acid emissions and levels of regional oxidants enhanced by wildfires" (2020), published in Nature Geoscience
  • "Global Changes in Secondary Atmospheric Pollutants During the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic" (2021), published in Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "Satellite evidence for changes in the NO2 weekly cycle over large cities" (2020), published in Scientific Reports

Frequent collaborators in Müller's research include Trissevgeni Stavrakou, Isabelle De Smedt, Maïté Bauwens, T. Stavrakou, and Michel Van Roozendaël, reflecting ongoing partnerships within atmospheric chemistry and air quality monitoring communities.

Best Publications

  • Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales:a multimodel evaluation

    F. Dentener;J. Drevet;Jean-François Lamarque;Isabelle Bey

  • Multimodel ensemble simulations of present-day and near-future tropospheric ozone

    D. S. Stevenson;F. J. Dentener;M. G. Schultz;K. Ellingsen

  • Global data set of biogenic VOC emissions calculated by the MEGAN model over the last 30 years

    Katerina Sindelarova;Katerina Sindelarova;Claire Granier;Idir Bouarar;Alex Guenther

  • Atmospheric Sulfur Cycle Simulated in the Global Model Gocart: Model Description and Global Properties

    Mian Chin;Mian Chin;Richard B. Rood;Shian Jiann Lin;Jean Francois Müller

  • Impact of coronavirus outbreak on NO 2 pollution assessed using TROPOMI and OMI observations.

    M Bauwens;S Compernolle;T Stavrakou;J-F Müller

  • MOZART, a global chemical transport model for ozone and related chemical tracers: 1. Model description

    G. P. Brasseur;D. A. Hauglustaine;S. Walters;P. J. Rasch

  • Geographical distribution and seasonal variation of surface emissions and deposition velocities of atmospheric trace gases

    Jean-François Müller

  • Radiative forcing in the 21st century due to ozone changes in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere

    M. Gauss;G. Myhre;G. Pitari;M. J. Prather

  • Vertical distributions of lightning NOx for use in regional and global chemical transport models

    Kenneth E. Pickering;Yansen Wang;Wei-Kuo Tao;Colin Price

  • The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models

    K. Tsigaridis;K. Tsigaridis;N. Daskalakis;N. Daskalakis;M. Kanakidou;P. J. Adams

  • IMAGES: A three‐dimensional chemical transport model of the global troposphere

    Jean-François Müller;Guy Brasseur

  • MOZART, a global chemical transport model for ozone and related chemical tracers: 2. Model results and evaluation

    D. A. Hauglustaine;G. P. Brasseur;S. Walters;P. J. Rasch

  • Variations in the predicted spatial distribution of atmospheric nitrogen deposition and their impact on carbon uptake by terrestrial ecosystems

    Elisabeth A. Holland;B. H. Braswell;Jean François Lamarque;Alan Townsend;Alan Townsend

  • A three-dimensional study of the tropospheric sulfur cycle

    M. Pham;J.-F. Müller;G. P. Brasseur;C. Granier

  • Atmospheric methane and carbon dioxide from SCIAMACHY satellite data: initial comparison with chemistry and transport models

    M. Buchwitz;R. de Beek;J. Burrows;H. Bovensmann

  • Fresh Air in the 21st Century

    Michael Prather;Michael Gauss;Terje Berntsen;Ivar Isaksen

  • Global isoprene emissions estimated using MEGAN, ECMWF analyses and a detailed canopy environment model

    J.-F. Müller;T. Stavrakou;S. Wallens;I. De Smedt

  • Four years of ground-based MAX-DOAS observations of HONO and NO 2 in the Beijing area

    F. Hendrick;J.-F. Müller;K. Clémer;K. Clémer;P. Wang

  • Twelve years of global observations of formaldehyde in the troposphere using GOME and SCIAMACHY sensors

    I. De Smedt;J.-F. Müller;T. Stavrakou

  • Multimodel simulations of carbon monoxide: Comparison with observations and projected near‐future changes

    D. T. Shindell;Gregory S. Faluvegi;D. S. Stevenson;M. C. Krol

Frequent Co-Authors

Trissevgeni Stavrakou
Trissevgeni Stavrakou Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
Cathy Clerbaux
Cathy Clerbaux Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Pierre-François Coheur
Pierre-François Coheur Université Libre de Bruxelles
Lieven Clarisse
Lieven Clarisse Université Libre de Bruxelles
Claire Granier
Claire Granier National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Isabelle De Smedt
Isabelle De Smedt Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
Daniel Hurtmans
Daniel Hurtmans Université Libre de Bruxelles
Guy Brasseur
Guy Brasseur Max Planck Society
Jozef Peeters
Jozef Peeters KU Leuven
Alex Guenther
Alex Guenther University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to various career paths, often complemented by related fields. For those interested in flexible and affordable options, exploring an fully funded dsw programs online can provide opportunities to merge social work with environmental advocacy.

If you're seeking a versatile foundation with cost-efficiency, an online general studies bachelor degree cheap may be appealing. This pathway allows students to tailor coursework, incorporating environmental topics alongside other disciplines.

For students aiming to balance study commitments, selecting one of the easiest bachelor degree to get can help maintain academic progress without overwhelming difficulty, potentially including related environmental or scientific studies.

Specifically focused on Earth sciences, the best online geology degree programs provide specialized training in understanding natural systems, which is critical in environmental research and management roles.

Best Scientists Citing Jean-François Müller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles