World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Laurence A. Harker

Laurence A. Harker

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
38615
World Ranking
9202
National Ranking
4745

Laurence A. Harker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurence A. Harker sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 318 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Laurence A. Harker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurence A. Harker sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laurence A. Harker was affiliated with Emory University in the United States throughout their academic career. Their research contributions were connected to this institution, which provided the context for their professional activities in the field of academic study.

Although detailed information about their publications, including recent papers, frequent co-authors, and publication venues, is not available, it is clear that Laurence A. Harker engaged in scholarly work during their career. The absence of listed papers or documented topics suggests limited accessible data on the specifics of their research outputs.

No information is provided regarding the main fields or subfields of study, which leaves the precise nature of their academic focus undefined in public records. Similarly, there are no records of book contributions that would clarify areas of expertise or extended academic involvement in publishing.

There are no listed awards or honors associated with Laurence A. Harker, and their year of passing is unspecified beyond the indication that they are deceased. This limits the available data on external recognition or milestones achieved during their professional life.

Due to the lack of details on co-authors or collaborative networks, it is not possible to specify their academic relationships or influences based on the current data.

Best Publications

  • A Platelet-Dependent Serum Factor That Stimulates the Proliferation of Arterial Smooth Muscle Cells In Vitro

    Russell Ross;John Glomset;Beverly Kariya;Laurence Harker

  • Studies of hypercholesterolemia in the nonhuman primate. I. Changes that lead to fatty streak formation.

    A Faggiotto;R Ross;L Harker

  • Homocystine-induced arteriosclerosis. The role of endothelial cell injury and platelet response in its genesis.

    L A Harker;R Ross;S J Slichter;C R Scott

  • Hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis

    Russell Ross;Laurence Harker

  • Mechanism of abnormal bleeding in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: acquired transient platelet dysfunction associated with selective alpha-granule release.

    Laurence A. Harker;Thomas W. Malpass;Herman E. Branson;Eugene A. Hessel

  • Platelet-Active Drugs: The Relationships Among Dose, Effectiveness, and Side Effects

    Carlo Patrono;Barry Coller;James E. Dalen;Valentin Fuster

  • Homocystinemia. Vascular injury and arterial thrombosis.

    L A Harker;S J Slichter;C R Scott;R Ross

  • Thrombokinetics in man

    Laurence A. Harker;Clement A. Finch

  • Bleeding Complications Associated With Cardiopulmonary Bypass

    Richard C. Woodman;Laurence A. Harker

  • A device for local drug delivery and methods for using the same

    Stephen R. Hanson;Neal A. Scott;Spencer B. King;Laurence A. Harker

  • Exaggerated platelet reactivity in major depression.

    Dominique L. Musselman;Aaron Tomer;Amita K. Manatunga;Bettina T. Knight

  • The bleeding time as a screening test for evaluation of platelet function.

    Laurence A. Harker;Sherrill J. Slichter

  • Neutrophil kinetics in man.

    J T Dancey;K A Deubelbeiss;L A Harker;C A Finch

  • Homocysteine-induced endothelial cell injury in vitro: A model for the study of vascular injury

    Robert T. Wall;John M. Harlan;Laurence A. Harker;Gary E. Striker

  • Platelet and fibrinogen consumption in man

    Laurence A. Harker;Sherill J. Slichter

  • Neutrophil-mediated endothelial injury in vitro mechanisms of cell detachment.

    J M Harlan;P D Killen;L A Harker;G E Striker

  • Ferrokinetics in man.

    C A Finch;K Deubelbeiss;J D Cook;J W Eschbach

  • Stent sheath for local drug delivery

    Neal A. Scott;Stephen R. Hanson;Spencer B. King;Laurence A. Harker

  • Thrombin stimulates tissue plasminogen activator release from cultured human endothelial cells.

    E G Levin;U Marzec;J Anderson;L A Harker

  • Studies of platelet and fibrinogen kinetics in patients with prosthetic heart valves.

    Laurence A. Harker;Sherrill J. Slichter

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell Ross
Russell Ross University of Washington
Alan B. Lumsden
Alan B. Lumsden Houston Methodist
John W. Adamson
John W. Adamson University of California, San Diego
John M. Harlan
John M. Harlan University of Washington
Buddy D. Ratner
Buddy D. Ratner University of Washington
Clement A. Finch
Clement A. Finch University of Washington
Allan S. Hoffman
Allan S. Hoffman University of Washington
Michael Gent
Michael Gent McMaster University
John H. Griffin
John H. Griffin Scripps Research Institute
Zaverio M. Ruggeri
Zaverio M. Ruggeri Scripps Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your career in medicine often means pursuing advanced or specialized degrees. Many students consider affordable paths like the cheapest dnp programs to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice and boost their leadership opportunities. For registered nurses looking to advance their education without breaking the bank, exploring cheapest rn to bsn options can be a smart move, offering flexibility and cost savings.

Not everyone takes a traditional route. Those with a non-nursing background can start a nursing career through direct entry msn programs online, which accelerate the transition into advanced practice specialties. Meanwhile, students seeking quicker entry into healthcare may find adn nursing programs more accessible, providing a fast track to becoming a registered nurse.

Whether your passion is clinical practice, leadership, or a rapid career shift, these online options make medical education more flexible and achievable, aligning with both your budget and timeline.

Best Scientists Citing Laurence A. Harker

Recently Published Articles