World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter C. Pairolero

Peter C. Pairolero

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
120
Citations
38628
World Ranking
3792
National Ranking
2083

Peter C. Pairolero publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Pairolero sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 309 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter C. Pairolero D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Pairolero sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 120 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter C. Pairolero is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. This institution is known for its contributions to clinical and medical research, suggesting that their professional activities may align with these domains.

No specific recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main and subfields of study, or main topics of work are noted in the available data. Additionally, there are no recorded awards or honors associated with their profile.

The absence of detailed publication and research topic information indicates that publicly accessible bibliometric records or curated research summaries may not be available or comprehensive for this individual at this time.

Despite the limited data, the association with a reputable institution such as the Mayo Clinic suggests involvement in medical or clinical research, potentially contributing to the advancement of healthcare knowledge and practices.

Best Publications

  • Thoracic aortic aneurysms: a population-based study.

    Bickerstaff Lk;Pairolero Pc;Hollier Lh;Melton Lj

  • Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography.

    Stephen J. Swensen;James R. Jett;Jeff A. Sloan;David E. Midthun

  • Modern thirty-day operative mortality for surgical resections in lung cancer.

    R J Ginsberg;L D Hill;R T Eagan;P Thomas

  • Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the thoracic aorta: natural history and clinicopathologic correlations.

    Anthony W. Stanson;Francis J. Kazmier;Larry H. Hollier;William D. Edwards

  • Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the Mayo Lung Project.

    Robert S. Fontana;David R. Sanderson;Lewis B. Woolner;William F. Taylor

  • Splenic Artery Aneurysms: Two Decades Experience at Mayo Clinic

    Maher A. Abbas;William M. Stone;Richard J. Fowl;Peter Gloviczki

  • Graft-related complications after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Reassurance from a 36-year population-based experience

    John W. Hallett;Donna M. Marshall;Tanya M. Petterson;Darryl T. Gray

  • Macroscopic enzyme-mapping verification of large, homogeneous, experimental myocardial infarcts of predictable size and location in dogs

    J.T. Lie;Peter C. Pairolero;Keith E. Holley;Jack L. Titus

  • Chest-wall reconstruction: an account of 500 consecutive patients.

    Phillip G. Arnold;Peter C. Pairolero

  • Splenic artery aneurysms.

    Trastek Vf;Pairolero Pc;Joyce Jw;Hollier Lh

  • Postsurgical Stage I Bronchogenic Carcinoma: Morbid Implications of Recurrent Disease

    Peter C. Pairolero;David E. Williams;Erik J. Bergstralh;Jeffrey M. Piehler

  • Colorectal lung metastases: Results of surgical excision

    Molly K. McAfee;Mark S. Allen;Victor F. Trastek;Duane M. Ilstrup

  • Pulmonary aspergilloma. Results of surgical treatment.

    R C Daly;P C Pairolero;J M Piehler;V F Trastek

  • Survival of patients surgically treated for Stage I lung cancer

    Williams De;Pairolero Pc;Davis Cs;Bernatz Pe

  • Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms: A thirty-year review

    Richard C. Pennell;Larry H. Hollier;J.T. Lie;Philip E. Bernatz

  • Esophageal Resection for Cancer of the Esophagus: Long-Term Function and Quality of Life

    Allison J McLarty;Claude Deschamps;Victor F Trastek;Mark S Allen

  • Inflammatory pseudotumors of the lung

    Robert J Cerfolio;Mark S Allen;Antonio G Nascimento;Claude Deschamps

  • Early and long-term results of prosthetic chest wall reconstruction.

    Claude Deschamps;Bulent Mehmit Tirnaksiz;Ramin Darbandi;Victor F. Trastek

  • Abdominal aortic aneurysms: the changing natural history.

    Linda K. Bickerstaff;Linda K. Bickerstaff;Larry H. Hollier;Larry H. Hollier;Hubert J. Van Peenen;Hubert J. Van Peenen;L.Joseph Melton;L.Joseph Melton

  • Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the thoracic aorta: natural history and clinicopathologic correlations@@@Ulceras arteriosclerosas aorticas perforantes: historia natural y correlacion clinico-patologica

    Anthony W. Stanson;Francis J. Kazmier;Larry H. Hollier;William D. Edwards

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark S. Allen
Mark S. Allen Mayo Clinic
Claude Deschamps
Claude Deschamps Mayo Clinic
Peter Gloviczki
Peter Gloviczki Mayo Clinic
Thomas C. Bower
Thomas C. Bower Mayo Clinic
James R. Jett
James R. Jett Mayo Clinic
Cathy D. Schleck
Cathy D. Schleck Mayo Clinic
Richard C. Daly
Richard C. Daly Mayo Clinic
Lance A. Liotta
Lance A. Liotta George Mason University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine offers a variety of career paths beyond the traditional role of physician. The rise of distance learning has made many healthcare careers more accessible, especially through online accredited programs. For example, students interested in pharmacy can explore an online pharmacy degree, which combines coursework in pharmacology, therapeutics, and patient care to prepare graduates for licensure exams and pharmacy careers.

Health information management is another growing field, offering options to study at online schools for health information management. These programs teach students how to manage patient data, healthcare systems, and electronic health records, fueling opportunities in both hospital and administrative settings. For those seeking quicker entry into the healthcare workforce, the average cost of medical billing and coding program is quite affordable, providing focused training for careers in medical records and billing departments.

Aspiring advanced practice nurses can pursue flexible online nurse practitioner programs, which prepare students for high-demand roles in family practice, pediatrics, and more. Exploring these related online healthcare degrees can open doors to vital, rewarding careers alongside or instead of traditional medical pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Peter C. Pairolero

Trending Scientists