World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Henry D. Tazelaar

Henry D. Tazelaar

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 10072 9450 5187 4790 538 33212

Henry D. Tazelaar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Henry D. Tazelaar between 1984 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Henry D. Tazelaar published across 43 years, from 1984 to 2026, averaging 13.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 150 publications in 2005. 12 of the 567 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 150. Peak 150 publications in 2005. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 15 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 21 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 25 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 21 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 150 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 1 publication
1984 2026

567 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Henry D. Tazelaar: publications per year, 1984 to 2026
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 8
1987 9
1988 2
1989 5
1990 5
1991 6
1992 7
1993 15
1994 9
1995 8
1996 12
1997 13
1998 21
1999 14
2000 12
2001 25
2002 13
2003 21
2004 15
2005 150
2006 16
2007 12
2008 7
2009 11
2010 11
2011 17
2012 11
2013 10
2014 7
2015 9
2016 6
2017 5
2018 8
2019 4
2020 21
2021 5
2022 5
2023 12
2024 7
2025 11
2026 1
Total 567
Download as CSV

Henry D. Tazelaar publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry D. Tazelaar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 521–540 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 538 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610 538
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Henry D. Tazelaar D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry D. Tazelaar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Henry D. Tazelaar is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on pulmonary and respiratory medicine. Their work spans across several subfields including physiology, oncology, surgery, and emergency medicine.

The scientist's research primarily addresses interstitial lung diseases and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, occupational and environmental lung diseases, sarcoidosis and beryllium toxicity research, as well as pleural and pulmonary diseases. Other notable topics include restraint-related deaths, medical imaging and pathology studies, and lung cancer treatments and mutations.

Key recent papers authored or co-authored by Henry D. Tazelaar include:

  • Radiologic, Pathologic, Clinical, and Physiologic Findings of Electronic Cigarette or Vaping Product Use-associated Lung Injury (EVALI): Evolving Knowledge and Remaining Questions, 2020, Radiology
  • Comprehensive Molecular and Pathologic Evaluation of Transitional Mesothelioma Assisted by Deep Learning Approach: A Multi-Institutional Study of the International Mesothelioma Panel from the MESOPATH Reference Center, 2020, Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • Radiologic and Pathologic Correlation in EVALI, 2020, American Journal of Roentgenology
  • The concept of mesothelioma in situ, with consideration of its potential impact on cytology diagnosis, 2021, Pathology
  • E-Cigarette or Vaping Product Use-Associated Lung Injury: A Review for Pathologists, 2020, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine

Frequently publishing in leading journals such as Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, Histopathology, CHEST Journal, and Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Henry D. Tazelaar's publication record demonstrates consistency in pathology and thoracic research.

Frequent collaborators include Brandon T. Larsen, Maxwell L. Smith, Yasmeen M. Butt, Andrew Churg, and Anja C. Roden, with collaboration counts ranging from 7 to 17 joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Revision of the 1990 Working Formulation for the Standardization of Nomenclature in the Diagnosis of Heart Rejection

    Susan Stewart;Michael C. Fishbein;Gregory I. Snell;Gerald J. Berry

  • Prognostic Significance of Histopathologic Subsets in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

    Julie A. Bjoraker;Jay H. Ryu;Mark K. Edwin;Jeffrey L. Myers

  • The frequency of familial dilated cardiomyopathy in a series of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

    Virginia V. Michels;Patricia P. Moll;Fletcher A. Miller;A. Jamil Tajik

  • Polymyositis-dermatomyositis-associated interstitial lung disease.

    William W. Douglas;Henry D. Tazelaar;Thomas E. Hartman;Robert P. Hartman

  • Congenitally bicuspid aortic valves: a surgical pathology study of 542 cases (1991 through 1996) and a literature review of 2,715 additional cases.

    Haideh Yazdani Sabet;William D. Edwards;Henry D. Tazelaar;Richard C. Daly

  • Constrictive Pericarditis in 26 Patients With Histologically Normal Pericardial Thickness

    Deepak R. Talreja;William D. Edwards;Gordon K. Danielson;Hartzell V. Schaff

  • Interstitial lung disease in polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Clinical features and prognosis as correlated with histologic findings.

    Henry D. Tazelaar;Robert W. Viggiano;Judith Pickersgill;Thomas V. Colby

  • CT and MR imaging of benign primary cardiac neoplasms with echocardiographic correlation.

    Philip A. Araoz;Sharon L. Mulvagh;Henry D. Tazelaar;Paul R. Julsrud

  • Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (borderline tumors): outcome-based study of 276 patients with long-term (> or =5-year) follow-up.

    Teri A Longacre;Jesse K McKenney;Jesse K McKenney;Henry D Tazelaar;Richard L Kempson

  • Oligodendrogliomas: the Mayo Clinic experience.

    Edward G. Shaw;Bernd W. Scheithauer;Judith R. O'Fallon;Henry D. Tazelaar

  • Five-year lung cancer screening experience: CT appearance, growth rate, location, and histologic features of 61 lung cancers.

    Rebecca M. Lindell;Thomas E. Hartman;Stephen J. Swensen;James R. Jett

  • Usefulness of Immunosuppression for Giant Cell Myocarditis

    Leslie T. Cooper;Joshua M. Hare;Henry D. Tazelaar;William D. Edwards

  • A clinical and histopathologic comparison of cardiac sarcoidosis and idiopathic giant cell myocarditis

    Yuji Okura;G.William Dec;Joshua M Hare;Makoto Kodama

  • Pathology of Vaping-Associated Lung Injury

    Yasmeen M. Butt;Maxwell L. Smith;Henry D. Tazelaar;Laszlo T. Vaszar

  • High short-term mortality following lung biopsy for usual interstitial pneumonia

    J P Utz;J H Ryu;W W Douglas;T E Hartman

  • Cardiac involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus.

    Kevin G. Moder;Todd D. Miller;Henry D. Tazelaar

  • Nitric Oxide Synthase, Cyclooxygenase 2, and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in the Angiogenesis of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

    Aizen J. Marrogi;William D. Travis;Judith A. Welsh;Mohammed A. Khan

  • Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia: Variable Appearance at High-Resolution Chest CT

    Thomas E. Hartman;Stephen J. Swensen;David M. Hansell;Thomas V. Colby

  • Bronchial carcinoid tumors.

    David G. Davila;William F. Dunn;Henry D. Tazelaar;Peter C. Pairolero

  • Ovarian epithelial tumors of borderline malignancy. A clinical and pathologic study of 109 cases.

    David G. Bostwick;Henry D. Tazelaar;Samuel C. Ballon;Michael R. Hendrickson

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas V. Colby
Thomas V. Colby Mayo Clinic
Jay H. Ryu
Jay H. Ryu Mayo Clinic
Andrew Churg
Andrew Churg University of British Columbia
James R. Jett
James R. Jett Mayo Clinic
William D. Travis
William D. Travis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jeffrey L. Myers
Jeffrey L. Myers University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Timothy O'Brien
Timothy O'Brien University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in medicine but looking for alternative or accelerated educational pathways? There are many online degree options in healthcare that offer flexibility, speed, and career growth. For advanced practice nurses, consider the shortest post master's dnp program options which can help you earn your Doctor of Nursing Practice in less time. Some programs also offer streamlined curricula, like online dnp programs without dissertation, removing the traditional dissertation requirement for a more focused clinical experience.

If you’re seeking direct patient care without a lengthy degree, a lpn accelerated program can prepare you for a Licensed Practical Nurse role quickly and efficiently. For those passionate about mental health, the fastest pmhnp program allows you to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner at a rapid pace.

These online pathways offer practical alternatives for building a rewarding career in healthcare, making it easier to advance your skills or enter the field sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Henry D. Tazelaar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles