World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
70
Citations
30262
World Ranking
1643
National Ranking
132

Mark Reed publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Reed sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 168 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mark Reed D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Reed sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Reed is affiliated with Scotland's Rural College in the United Kingdom and primarily works within the field of Environmental Science. Their research covers a range of subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Management Science and Operations Research, Ecology, General Health Professions, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their main topics of study involve Evaluation and Performance Assessment, Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Economic and Environmental Valuation, Community Development and Social Impact, Sustainability and Climate Change Governance, and Health Policy Implementation Science.

Mark Reed has contributed to a variety of research publications. Among the notable papers are:

  • Evaluating impact from research: A methodological framework (2021, Research Policy)
  • Have farmers had enough of experts? (2021, Environmental Management)
  • Food System Resilience: Concepts, Issues, and Challenges (2022, Annual Review of Environment and Resources)
  • Is this what success looks like? Mismatches between the aims, claims, and evidence used to demonstrate impact from knowledge exchange processes at the interface of environmental science and policy (2021, Environmental Science & Policy)
  • The tree of participation: a new model for inclusive decision-making (2021, Community Development Journal)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mark Reed include:

  • Eric Jensen
  • Helen Kendall
  • Niki Rust
  • Pippa J. Chapman
  • Julie Ingram

The scientist frequently publishes in several venues, with recurring contributions to:

  • Emerald Open Research
  • Environmental Science & Policy
  • Sustainability Science
  • Mires and Peat
  • Open Research Europe

Best Publications

  • Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review

    Mark S. Reed

  • Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management.

    Mark S. Reed;Anil Graves;Norman Dandy;Helena Posthumus

  • What is social learning

    Mark Reed;Mark Reed;Anna Clair Evely;Georgina Cundill;Ioan Fazey

  • Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management

    Christopher M. Raymond;Ioan Fazey;Mark S. Reed;Lindsay C. Stringer

  • Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management

    Christina Prell;Klaus Hubacek;Mark Reed

  • An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities

    Mark S. Reed;Evan D.G. Fraser;Andrew J. Dougill

  • Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management.

    Evan D.G. Fraser;Andrew J. Dougill;Warren E. Mabee;Mark Reed

  • Unpacking “Participation” in the Adaptive Management of Social–ecological Systems: a Critical Review

    Lindsay C. Stringer;Andrew J. Dougill;Evan Fraser;Klaus Hubacek

  • A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?

    Mark S. Reed;Steven Vella;Edward Challies;Joris de Vente

  • What are shared and social values of ecosystems

    Jasper O. Kenter;Jasper O. Kenter;Liz O'Brien;Neal Hockley;Neil Ravenscroft

  • Adaptations to climate change, drought and desertification: local insights to enhance policy in southern Africa

    Lindsay C. Stringer;Jen C. Dyer;Mark S. Reed;Andrew J. Dougill

  • Ten essentials for action-oriented and second order energy transitions, transformations and climate change research

    Ioan Fazey;Niko Schäpke;Guido Caniglia;James Patterson

  • Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management.

    M. S. Reed;L. C. Stringer;I. Fazey;A. C. Evely

  • Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management

    Ioan Fazey;Anna C. Evely;Mark S. Reed;Lindsay C. Stringer

  • How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands

    Joris de Vente;Mark S. Reed;Lindsay C. Stringer;Sandra Valente

  • PARTICIPATORY INDICATOR DEVELOPMENT: WHAT CAN ECOLOGISTS AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES LEARN FROM EACH OTHER

    Mark S. Reed;Andrew J. Dougill;Timothy R. Baker

  • Environmental change in moorland landscapes.

    J. Holden;L. Shotbolt;A. Bonn;T. P. Burt

  • Combining analytical frameworks to assess livelihood vulnerability to climate change and analyse adaptation options

    M S Reed;G Podesta;I Fazey;N Geeson

  • Participatory scenario development for environmental management: a methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands

    M.S. Reed;J. Kenter;A. Bonn;A. Bonn;K. Broad

  • Learning from Doing Participatory Rural Research: Lessons from the Peak District National Park

    A J Dougill;E.D.G. Fraser;J. Holden;K Hubacek

Frequent Co-Authors

Lindsay C. Stringer
Lindsay C. Stringer University of York
Klaus Hubacek
Klaus Hubacek University of Groningen
Ioan Fazey
Ioan Fazey University of York
Aletta Bonn
Aletta Bonn Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Andrew J. Dougill
Andrew J. Dougill University of York
Evan D. G. Fraser
Evan D. G. Fraser University of Guelph
Joseph Holden
Joseph Holden University of Leeds
Fred Worrall
Fred Worrall Durham University
Mette Termansen
Mette Termansen University of Copenhagen
Tim Burt
Tim Burt Durham University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths. Many students complement their knowledge with degrees in related social sciences, such as pursuing an online sociology degree bachelors, which helps develop a deeper understanding of human-environment interactions.

For those interested in advancing their education without a heavy research focus, online edd programs no dissertation provide an excellent option, especially for environmental educators aiming to enhance their leadership skills without the demands of a traditional dissertation.

Educators seeking a smooth transition to a doctoral level may explore online eds to edd bridge program options, which allow for streamlined progression and specialization in environmental education and policy.

Additionally, environmental professionals focusing on social welfare aspects often benefit from advanced practice degrees. Programs like fully funded dsw programs online can be especially appealing for those looking to minimize financial burdens while expanding their expertise in environmental social work.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Reed

Trending Scientists