World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
92
Citations
32612
World Ranking
418
National Ranking
155

Thomas E. Martin publications per year

1980: 1 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 1 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 3 publications
1980 2025

263 publications in total across all disciplines

Thomas E. Martin publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas E. Martin sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 239 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Thomas E. Martin D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas E. Martin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Thomas E. Martin is affiliated with the University of Montana in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their work spans several interconnected subfields including Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist's research focuses extensively on avian ecology and behavior, animal behavior and reproduction, and wildlife ecology and conservation. Other areas of study include species distribution in relation to climate change, ecological and vegetation dynamics, plant and animal studies, and rangeland and wildlife management.

Thomas E. Martin has published frequently in selected scientific venues, with notable repeated contributions to:

  • Functional Ecology
  • Birds of the World
  • The Wilson Journal of Ornithology
  • The American Naturalist
  • Barbastella

Recent papers include:

  • "Neuron numbers link innovativeness with both absolute and relative brain size in birds", 2022, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • "Metamorphosis in an Era of Increasing Climate Variability", 2021, Trends in Ecology & Evolution
  • "Longer-lived tropical songbirds reduce breeding activity as they buffer impacts of drought", 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • "Contrasting seasonal effects of climate change influence density in a cold-adapted species", 2022, Global Change Biology
  • "Daily Nest Predation Rates Decrease with Body Size in Passerine Birds", 2020, The American Naturalist

Frequent collaborators with whom Thomas E. Martin has co-authored multiple publications include James C. Mouton, Necmiye Şahin Arslan, Riccardo Ton, Penn Lloyd, and Timothy R. Forrester.

In recognition of their scientific contributions, Thomas E. Martin was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2009.

Best Publications

  • Food as a limit on breeding birds: a life-history perspective

    Thomas E. Martin

  • Avian Life History Evolution in Relation to Nest Sites, Nest Predation, and Food

    Thomas E. Martin

  • Handbook of Field Methods for Monitoring Landbirds

    C. John Ralph;Geoffrey R Geupel;Peter Pyle;Thomas E Martin

  • Nest Predation and Nest SitesNew perspectives on old patterns

    Unknown

  • Manual de métodos de campo para el monitoreo de aves terrestres

    C. John Ralph;Geoffrey R. Geupel;Peter Pyle;Thomas E. Martin

  • Nest Predation and Nest-Site Selection of a Western Population of the Hermit Thrush

    Thomas E. Martin;James J. Roper

  • Nest predation among vegetation layers and habitat types: revising the dogmas.

    Thomas E. Martin

  • Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects.

    Thomas E. Martin;Jason Scott;Jason Scott;Chris Menge

  • ARE MICROHABITAT PREFERENCES OF COEXISTING SPECIES UNDER SELECTION AND ADAPTIVE

    Thomas E. Martin

  • Fecundity-Survival Trade-Offs and Parental Risk-Taking in Birds

    Cameron K. Ghalambor;Thomas E. Martin

  • Life History Traits of Open- vs. Cavity-Nesting Birds

    Thomas E. Martin;Pingjun Li

  • Parent birds assess nest predation risk and adjust their reproductive strategies

    J. J. Fontaine;T. E. Martin;T. E. Martin

  • Life history evolution in tropical and south temperate birds : What do we really know ?

    Thomas E. Martin

  • Bird communities and habitat as ecological indicators of forest condition in regional monitoring.

    Grant E. Canterbury;Thomas E. Martin;Daniel R. Petit;Lisa J. Petit

  • Parental care and clutch sizes in North and South American birds.

    Thomas E. Martin;Thomas E. Martin;P. R. Martin;C. R. Olson;B. J. Heidinger

  • Nest-Site Selection and Nesting Success of Cavity-Nesting Birds in High Elevation Forest Drainages

    Pingjun Li;Thomas E. Martin

  • Evolution of passerine incubation behavior: influence of food, temperature, and nest predation.

    Courtney J. Conway;Thomas E. Martin

  • Interaction of Nest Predation and Food Limitation in Reproductive Strategies

    Thomas E. Martin;Thomas E. Martin

  • A new view of avian life-history evolution tested on an incubation paradox

    Thomas E. Martin

  • On the advantage of being different: Nest predation and the coexistence of bird species

    Thomas E. Martin

  • Ecology and Management of Neotropical Migratory Birds: A Synthesis and Review of Critical Issues

    Thomas E. Martin;Deborah M. Finch

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander V. Badyaev
Alexander V. Badyaev University of Arizona
Cameron K. Ghalambor
Cameron K. Ghalambor Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Courtney J. Conway
Courtney J. Conway University of Idaho
Joshua J. Tewksbury
Joshua J. Tewksbury University of Colorado Boulder
Jean Clobert
Jean Clobert Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
James V. Briskie
James V. Briskie University of Canterbury
Frank Gill
Frank Gill Drexel University
Hubert Schwabl
Hubert Schwabl Washington State University
Frederick H. Sheldon
Frederick H. Sheldon Louisiana State University
Santiago Merino
Santiago Merino Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a wide range of interdisciplinary career paths. Many students choose to expand their expertise through advanced study, either in directly related fields or in complementary disciplines. For example, pursuing an online history master's degree can help develop skills in research and analysis, which are valuable for environmental policy work or science communication.

Others find that knowledge of data management is crucial for ecological research, making an affordable library science degree online a strategic choice. Meanwhile, those interested in wildlife rehabilitation and education may benefit from exploring accredited speech pathology programs, especially those with an interest in animal communication or environmental health.

For career changers or non-traditional students, online bridge programs non-SLP majors offer flexible pathways to new professional roles. Online education makes it easier than ever to tailor your qualifications, supporting a dynamic career in ecology, evolution, or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas E. Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles