D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Ecology and Evolution D-index 32 Citations 3,246 63 World Ranking 4591 National Ranking 76

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Habitat
  • Predation

Jukka T. Forsman spends much of his time researching Ecology, Habitat, Interspecific competition, Attraction and Nest. The various areas that Jukka T. Forsman examines in his Ecology study include Population density and Reproductive success. His study in Reproductive success is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Nest box, Foraging, Competition and Predation.

In his study, Ficedula is strongly linked to Parus, which falls under the umbrella field of Interspecific competition. His Nest research incorporates themes from Intraspecific competition and Ecological niche. Jukka T. Forsman combines subjects such as Accipiter and Sparrowhawk with his study of Avian clutch size.

His most cited work include:

  • Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics. (323 citations)
  • Positive fitness consequences of interspecific interaction with a potential competitor (117 citations)
  • Evolution of heterospecific attraction: using other species as cues in habitat selection (109 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Ecology, Parus, Ficedula, Interspecific competition and Habitat are his primary areas of study. His research investigates the connection with Ecology and areas like Reproductive success which intersect with concerns in Competition. The concepts of his Parus study are interwoven with issues in Arboreal locomotion and Ficedula albicollis.

As part of the same scientific family, he usually focuses on Ficedula, concentrating on Plumage and intersecting with Sympatry and Fecundity selection. His Interspecific competition study incorporates themes from Population density, Niche, Intraspecific competition, Generalist and specialist species and Guild. His studies deal with areas such as Abundance, Natural selection and Community structure as well as Habitat.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Ecology (89.19%)
  • Parus (36.49%)
  • Ficedula (32.43%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Zoology (20.27%)
  • Ecology (89.19%)
  • Social information (14.86%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Zoology, Ecology, Social information, Nest site and Interspecific competition. His Zoology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Predation, Agonistic behaviour and Habitat. His Ecology research includes a combination of various areas of study, such as Global change and Scale.

His studies in Interspecific competition integrate themes in fields like Intraspecific competition, Cyanistes, Niche segregation, Ficedula and Spatial heterogeneity. In his research, Seasonal breeder, Abundance and Passerine is intimately related to Nest, which falls under the overarching field of Ficedula. His Spatial heterogeneity study which covers Parus that intersects with Avian clutch size.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Is it interspecific information use or aggression between putative competitors that steers the selection of nest-site characteristics? A reply to Slagsvold and Wiebe (9 citations)
  • Heterospecific Nest Site Copying Behavior in a Wild Bird: Assessing the Influence of Genetics and Past Experience on a Joint Breeding Phenotype (8 citations)
  • Interspecific information on predation risk affects nest site choice in a passerine bird. (6 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Habitat
  • Predation

His primary areas of investigation include Nest site, Interspecific competition, Zoology, Ficedula albicollis and Competitor analysis. Jukka T. Forsman interconnects Quantitative genetics and Heritability, Copying, Genetics in the investigation of issues within Nest site. His Interspecific competition research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Predation, Niche segregation, Passerine, Nest and Ficedula.

His Zoology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Agonistic behaviour and Habitat. In his research, Jukka T. Forsman undertakes multidisciplinary study on Ficedula albicollis and Geography. He merges Competitor analysis with Aggression in his research.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics.

Janne-Tuomas Seppänen;Jukka T. Forsman;Mikko Mönkkönen;Robert L. Thomson.
Ecology (2007)

389 Citations

Positive fitness consequences of interspecific interaction with a potential competitor

J. T. Forsman;J.-T. Seppänen;M. Mönkkönen.
Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2002)

144 Citations

Evolution of heterospecific attraction: using other species as cues in habitat selection

Mikko Mönkkönen;Roger Härdling;Jukka T. Forsman;Juha Tuomi.
Evolutionary Ecology (1999)

137 Citations

Positive interactions between migrant and resident birds: testing the heterospecific attraction hypothesis

Robert L. Thomson;Jukka T. Forsman;Mikko Mönkkönen.
Oecologia (2003)

128 Citations

Fear factor: prey habitat selection and its consequences in a predation risk landscape

Robert L. Thomson;Jukka T. Forsman;Francesc Sardà‐Palomera;Mikko Mönkkönen.
Ecography (2006)

122 Citations

Competitor density cues for habitat quality facilitating habitat selection and investment decisions

Jukka T. Forsman;Mårten B. Hjernquist;Jenni Taipale;Lars Gustafsson.
Behavioral Ecology (2008)

119 Citations

Interspecific Social Learning: Novel Preference Can Be Acquired from a Competing Species

Janne-Tuomas Seppänen;Jukka T. Forsman.
Current Biology (2007)

119 Citations

Heterospecific attraction among forest birds: a review

Mikko Mönkkönen;Jukka T. Forsman.
Ornithological Science (2002)

111 Citations

The role of climate in limiting European resident bird populations

Jukka T. Forsman;Mikko Mönkkönen.
Journal of Biogeography (2003)

109 Citations

Heterospecific attraction and food resources in migrants' breeding patch selection in northern boreal forest.

Jukka T Forsman;Mikko Mönkkönen;Pekka Helle;Jouko Inkeröinen.
Oecologia (1998)

100 Citations

Best Scientists Citing Jukka T. Forsman

Indrikis Krams

Indrikis Krams

University of Latvia

Publications: 34

Otso Ovaskainen

Otso Ovaskainen

University of Helsinki

Publications: 21

Toni Laaksonen

Toni Laaksonen

University of Turku

Publications: 20

Mikko Mönkkönen

Mikko Mönkkönen

University of Jyväskylä

Publications: 17

Robert D. Magrath

Robert D. Magrath

Australian National University

Publications: 14

Ben C. Sheldon

Ben C. Sheldon

University of Oxford

Publications: 13

Kenneth A. Schmidt

Kenneth A. Schmidt

Texas Tech University

Publications: 13

Etienne G. J. Danchin

Etienne G. J. Danchin

Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

Publications: 12

Robert J. Fletcher

Robert J. Fletcher

University of Florida

Publications: 12

Damien R. Farine

Damien R. Farine

University of Zurich

Publications: 12

Jesús M. Avilés

Jesús M. Avilés

Spanish National Research Council

Publications: 12

Anna Qvarnström

Anna Qvarnström

Uppsala University

Publications: 11

Anders Pape Møller

Anders Pape Møller

University of Paris-Saclay

Publications: 11

Christiaan Both

Christiaan Both

University of Groningen

Publications: 11

Tore Slagsvold

Tore Slagsvold

University of Oslo

Publications: 11

Blandine Doligez

Blandine Doligez

University of Lyon System

Publications: 10

Profile was last updated on December 6th, 2021.
Research.com Ranking is based on data retrieved from the Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG).
The ranking d-index is inferred from publications deemed to belong to the considered discipline.

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us
Something went wrong. Please try again later.